• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Aristotle regard the description of an ideal state and the analysis of actual states as distinct or as related subjects of political enquiry?

Extracts from this document...


Ian Bishop Does Aristotle regard the description of an ideal state and the analysis of actual states as distinct or as related subjects of political enquiry? Aristotle regards the state as a natural entity, which is possessing of a telos, that is, an end. This end is assumed to also be the best condition that a state can reach; that being the provision of the capacity to live the good life for the citizens of the state. The ostensible purpose of The Politics is to determine whether this goal is being achieved by current states, and how it might best achieved in the future. The failure of current states to provide these circumstances motivates Aristotle to inquire into the properties of a hypothetical 'ideal state', and relate his findings to existing states. Clearly then, there is at least and academic relationship between the study of existing states and the ideal state to which they are compared. However, for Aristotle I believe that the relationship is far deeper than this, for the telos of providing the good life is the same for both ideal and actual states in Aristotle's view. Thus, it seems to me that not only are the studies of ideal and actual states related, they are ultimately identical for Aristotle. ...read more.


Aristotle presents his explanation of the existence of the state in terms of what we might call ideals. That is, the state is the culmination of man's natural political instinct to seek a self-sufficient life that will permit the achievement of eudaimonia. It is in these terms that Aristotle understands the state, for the achievement of the good life is the telos of the state, and to understand a thing Aristotle require that you know the end of that thing. Since the end of the state is the achievement of the good life for its citizens, an understanding of this goal is an understanding of the state. Thus, it is not possible for Aristotle to regard an ideal state (that is, one that has reached its telos) separately from an existing state, since they share the same basic definition. Admittedly there is some difficulty in using the order of The Politics to confirm that Aristotle intended to consider ideal and actual states in succession, as the original order of the books (or of the source material that we have labelled as books) is unknown. However, the similarity in argumentative style cannot be dismissed so easily. Even when speaking about ideals, Aristotle never allows himself to be blinded to practical considerations. Indeed, as we have seen with the matter of common ownership, Aristotle dismisses a principle, however desirable in theory, if it will not be practicable. ...read more.


Such divisions are merely for the purposes of clear argument, and Aristotle does not intend to divide the two into separate academic spheres. Rather, both are intrinsically related as topics of political enquiry for Aristotle seeks to understand what constitutes an ideal state and how it might be brought about based upon knowledge of existing states. Thus, it is not only difficult separate Aristotle's views on ideal and actual states, but also fruitless and meaningless. Aristotle intends his writings on both to be considered in the light of the other. He grounds his study of the ideal state in practical considerations derived from knowledge of actual states, and he examines existing states with a view to the creation of an ideal state. In conclusion, Aristotle's political enquiry is by its very nature a study of the relationship between actual states and the concept of an ideal state. He separates them only in the manner of point and counter-point. Aristotle does not seek to place a clear divide between what constitutes an ideal state and what forms an actual state. Since he views the state as a natural body, he believes that it shall achieve an ideal form in actuality at some point. Thus, for Aristotle, it is anathema to separate the study of the ideal state from the consideration of actual states. 1750 1 Book ii 1 l.35 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    - We have a right to avoid it, and a right to caution others against the individual. "If he displeases us, we my express our distaste: but we shall not feel called upon to make his life uncomfortable" - So if an individual has made a bad choice, we shouldn't condemn them further.

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    One striking difference between the Chinese and Western thinking relates to the sense of order. The Western sense of order could be regarded as "scientific" in contrast to the Chinese "aesthetic" sense of order. Western philosophers try to build rationally defendable systems, with an assumption that there is something permanent,

  1. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    Informally, it is often known as a "bottom-up" approach. In inductive reasoning, the process begins with specific observations and measures, then patterns and regularities are detected, formulating some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.

  2. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    ill use Sartre's analogy of the painting to illustrate facticity. We are absolutely free to paint what ever we like but the colures, paper fact we can only paint flat are outside our control. We must use these as a frame work in which to paint the picture of our choice.

  1. Is active citizenship necessary to the achievement of eudaimonia?

    This autarkeia is the natural telos of the state, Aristotle argues, and it permits the citizens of a state to have leisure. It is important to note that self-sufficiency extends beyond an economic idea for Aristotle, and full self sufficiency will consist in a state enabling its citizens to achieve the range of goods necessary for eudaimonia.

  2. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    In order to achieve well being one must attempt to find the golden mean of all the virtues in the 36 name table, however Aristotle does clearly remind us that there are no exact laws in political sciences rather we need to approach each case individually informed by calculated virtues and some practical wisdom.

  1. Free essay

    Explaining Aristotle

    It causes motion, rather than being the origin of reality, however can be thought to be so. However he is not the creator of the universe. In Aristotle's view the prime mover is a metaphysical necessity because his system requires an unmoved mover, an actual and fully realised form.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    Had everything in life yet found no meaning in his life 4. Felt his work was pointless because he did not believe people would remember his work 5. Believed peasants had a better life than him because of their faith 6.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work