• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

does universial morality exist?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

8. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does this mean that it is impossible to have objective knowledge? For instance one could ask the question: Is there such a thing as universal morality? Universal morality. Is that equivalent to the concept of rules and regulations? Our morality seems to very often stem from the regulations set by the leaders of a state or country. This is how we come upon our own justifications. However these rules must have derived from something else. What was the original stimulus of morality, and is this knowledge humans have of morality objective? This is going to be the main question of my discussion. This essay will then touch upon the possibilities of an objective morality through reasoning with Absolutism and Immanuel Kant's Ethics. It will then move on to the counter argument, the possibilities of an objective morality not existing by reasoning with Moral Relativism and Albert Camus' works on existentialism. ...read more.

Middle

We then do not steal because it would make us feel guilty for doing something bad. This same statement applies to lying. Kant therefore insists that humans are striving for the highest good in life and in that case must carry our duty as humans by avoiding going against objective moral laws, like lying. I think that universal morality could be true because there does seem to be a correlation between the laws and morals of different cultures around the world. However this theory can be seen as weak, because there is no way of completely proving objective moral laws. Many people disagree with it because it proposes that humans do not have the freedom to make their own decisions defeating the possibility of objective knowledge. On the other hand, possibilities of universal morality existing is just as great. Moral relativism suggests that moral values are applicable only within certain cultural boundaries or within an individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand I do believe that we have the opportunity to have objective knowledge, although our experience may not be original our decisions are still personal, therefore objective knowledge does exist. Objective knowledge involves having your own suggestions and opinions. Existentialism is a fine example of permitting the existence of objective knowledge however I think it may be taking it a step too far, it seems impossible for a society to survive if people only followed what they believed to be right and disagreed on everything else. In my opinion objective knowledge is as much of a commoditiy as any of our daily essencials that define what us humans are. With out a desire to have a choice or personal opinion on what you know (objective knowledge) our spieces would be dull and boring, we also would not be the advanced thinkers we are today. Alex Liu Philosophy HL ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. 'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

    Thus, due to possible abuse of the system, euthanasia should not be legalised as the existence of such a system could allow such people even more capacity for murder by manipulating patients and documentation. There are also arguments against the legalisation of euthanasia due to its' possible negative impact on the community.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    If there are no universally acceptable moral standards, no moral standards can be applied across the globe. It is very difficult to decipher whether or not humanitarian intervention is in conflict with the doctrine of cultural relativism. If one supposes that humanitarian intervention is justified in one instance, for example

  1. Business environment

    The article fails to specify how the ethicist performs the control function. Fama and Jensen's (1983) argument supporting the arbitrator position of outside board members to solve agency problems between internal forces of management and shareholdcrs is not directly applicable.

  2. Religion and Morality

    The DCT can be seen to provide a strong foundation for a stable necessary morality to be built upon as well as personal reasons to abide by it. For example, taken from the views of Kant (although not directly aimed at the DCT)

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    and rationality, while the negative approach requires that a life simply lack certain negative features to be worth living, such as extreme pain, hopeless deterioration, and irreversible incapacity to give or withhold consent. The positions can be combined to hold that a life is worth living only if certain positive features are present and certain negative features absent.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of Duty as the basis of morality (33 marks).

    besides doing it because we know it is our duty to do so. The fact that we happen to be doing what duty prescribes is just luck. It is wrong because the moment anything that duty says we should do becomes something we no longer enjoy, we won't do it.

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    These people may believe relativism gives them a convincing reason to be good: they are good because they do what they believe to be the right thing, and this means that they never do the wrong thing. Another reason why relativism provides us with a reason to be good is

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    As Randall Terry said ?You have relativism...you have anything. How long before child pornography is mainstream?? Cultural absolutism aims to solve this problem, it is the idea that although there are differences in culture, and we should accept those,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work