• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

does universial morality exist?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

8. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does this mean that it is impossible to have objective knowledge? For instance one could ask the question: Is there such a thing as universal morality? Universal morality. Is that equivalent to the concept of rules and regulations? Our morality seems to very often stem from the regulations set by the leaders of a state or country. This is how we come upon our own justifications. However these rules must have derived from something else. What was the original stimulus of morality, and is this knowledge humans have of morality objective? This is going to be the main question of my discussion. This essay will then touch upon the possibilities of an objective morality through reasoning with Absolutism and Immanuel Kant's Ethics. It will then move on to the counter argument, the possibilities of an objective morality not existing by reasoning with Moral Relativism and Albert Camus' works on existentialism. ...read more.

Middle

We then do not steal because it would make us feel guilty for doing something bad. This same statement applies to lying. Kant therefore insists that humans are striving for the highest good in life and in that case must carry our duty as humans by avoiding going against objective moral laws, like lying. I think that universal morality could be true because there does seem to be a correlation between the laws and morals of different cultures around the world. However this theory can be seen as weak, because there is no way of completely proving objective moral laws. Many people disagree with it because it proposes that humans do not have the freedom to make their own decisions defeating the possibility of objective knowledge. On the other hand, possibilities of universal morality existing is just as great. Moral relativism suggests that moral values are applicable only within certain cultural boundaries or within an individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand I do believe that we have the opportunity to have objective knowledge, although our experience may not be original our decisions are still personal, therefore objective knowledge does exist. Objective knowledge involves having your own suggestions and opinions. Existentialism is a fine example of permitting the existence of objective knowledge however I think it may be taking it a step too far, it seems impossible for a society to survive if people only followed what they believed to be right and disagreed on everything else. In my opinion objective knowledge is as much of a commoditiy as any of our daily essencials that define what us humans are. With out a desire to have a choice or personal opinion on what you know (objective knowledge) our spieces would be dull and boring, we also would not be the advanced thinkers we are today. Alex Liu Philosophy HL ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. 'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

    on the sick, the elderly and the disabled. However, Glover (1977) says that this argument is unconvincing and thus rejects it, whilst Helga Kuhse (1991) has observed that this has not happened in the Netherlands, where voluntary euthanasia is legal. It is further argued that its' negative effects on the community might include the damage of the care of patients who are dying.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    that of Kosovo, it is not necessarily simply because of one culture imposing its views on another culture. It is very difficult to prove what is part of one culture and not of another, or indeed part of any culture at all.

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    identity and extending such obligation to other living things is a good insight that pushes and calls for special discussions of normativity. How does social or practical identity differ from moral identity? Do you think that moral identity is tenable?

  2. Moral absolutism. Moralism seems to be an essential component of American conservatism, whose adherents ...

    mountain, these are absolute rules and if we take a look at some of them you see why such rules are not always such a bad influence on the people they involve. For example, all commandments are not only text written by god but Law's and morals that a person

  1. Religion and Morality

    According to Emil Brunner (1947), 'The Good consists in always doing what God wills at any particular moment', as it essentially impossible for God to command an evil act. If nothing was commanded or forbidden by God then there would be no wrong or right and arguably, there would be chaos.

  2. Business environment

    Yet, the control is not effective unless it limits the decision discretion of the managers. In practice, the board has limited power and control [see The American Law Institute, (1982) for a delineation of the powers and functions of the Board of Directors].

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    Absolute refers to the fact that the moral laws will not and cannot change, and are the same for everyone everywhere through all periods of time, such as Kant's deontological theory. Relative means the rules may change depending on the circumstances, the individual, the society or the time period.

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    are, what if God orders someone to do something that is wrong, for example, God says murder is wrong, and then commands Abraham to kill his son. This is the problem of Abhorrent Commands. As well as this, if anything that God says is right, then as the philosopher Leibniz

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work