• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

does universial morality exist?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

8. To understand something you need to rely on your own experience and culture. Does this mean that it is impossible to have objective knowledge? For instance one could ask the question: Is there such a thing as universal morality? Universal morality. Is that equivalent to the concept of rules and regulations? Our morality seems to very often stem from the regulations set by the leaders of a state or country. This is how we come upon our own justifications. However these rules must have derived from something else. What was the original stimulus of morality, and is this knowledge humans have of morality objective? This is going to be the main question of my discussion. This essay will then touch upon the possibilities of an objective morality through reasoning with Absolutism and Immanuel Kant's Ethics. It will then move on to the counter argument, the possibilities of an objective morality not existing by reasoning with Moral Relativism and Albert Camus' works on existentialism. ...read more.

Middle

We then do not steal because it would make us feel guilty for doing something bad. This same statement applies to lying. Kant therefore insists that humans are striving for the highest good in life and in that case must carry our duty as humans by avoiding going against objective moral laws, like lying. I think that universal morality could be true because there does seem to be a correlation between the laws and morals of different cultures around the world. However this theory can be seen as weak, because there is no way of completely proving objective moral laws. Many people disagree with it because it proposes that humans do not have the freedom to make their own decisions defeating the possibility of objective knowledge. On the other hand, possibilities of universal morality existing is just as great. Moral relativism suggests that moral values are applicable only within certain cultural boundaries or within an individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand I do believe that we have the opportunity to have objective knowledge, although our experience may not be original our decisions are still personal, therefore objective knowledge does exist. Objective knowledge involves having your own suggestions and opinions. Existentialism is a fine example of permitting the existence of objective knowledge however I think it may be taking it a step too far, it seems impossible for a society to survive if people only followed what they believed to be right and disagreed on everything else. In my opinion objective knowledge is as much of a commoditiy as any of our daily essencials that define what us humans are. With out a desire to have a choice or personal opinion on what you know (objective knowledge) our spieces would be dull and boring, we also would not be the advanced thinkers we are today. Alex Liu Philosophy HL ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. 'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

    on the sick, the elderly and the disabled. However, Glover (1977) says that this argument is unconvincing and thus rejects it, whilst Helga Kuhse (1991) has observed that this has not happened in the Netherlands, where voluntary euthanasia is legal. It is further argued that its' negative effects on the community might include the damage of the care of patients who are dying.

  2. Religion and Morality

    to go against your own self-interest for the benefit of others, as self-sacrificial acts are looked upon well by God. This provides more answers to the question 'Why be Moral?' The DCT can be accessed through the Decalogue in the Bible (Exodus 20, old Testament), which provides a set of ten absolute, deontological commands by God.

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    The varying stances of realism have differing views on the topic of humanitarian intervention. Interpretive realism argues that states always pursue only their own national interest, national interest being the interest of the citizens of that state. Hence humanitarian intervention should never occur, as it needs a humanitarian motive.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of Duty as the basis of morality (33 marks).

    We can be sure however that because it is a deontological argument, that we have an absolute principle to follow that does not look at consequences of particular actions or changes in certain situations. It is absolute and definite and we can be sure that there are no exceptions to the rule.

  1. Business environment

    He further states "Because a corporation acts only through those who act for it, it is the latter who must assume moral responsibility for the corporation." (Dobson 1990) The article "Ethics of Shareholder Referendums; Corporate Democracy or Hypocrisy?" discusses changes in business conditions that have led to the increased use of the referendum process for approaching controversial decision making.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    The problem of moral law is resolved by the idea of moral identity and obligation. The reflective structure of human identity presupposes that a person identifies himself with some law or principle which will govern his choices and reasons. It requires him to be a law to himself.

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    How can we define 'good' and 'right' if these terms are flexible? We can't, and so surely this means that these theories do not provide humans with a convincing reason to be good? Maybe people who follow relativist theories of morality do so simply because of this flexibility, and so they see this as a strength of the theory.

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    Tribe in Uganda, were studied in a report by Turnbull and he was ?shocked? by the way they have had to adapt for survival, he says they have little empathy for each other and will not share food with the weak or elderly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work