• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty.' Explain how Kant analysed this concept.

Extracts from this document...


Charlotte Martin a) 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty.' Explain how Kant analysed this concept. 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty' implies, to quote F.H. Bradley, that duty should be done for 'duty's sake', and not for any consequential events. This approach to action is deontological, and concentrates solely on the process of an action (its means), not its possible outcome (its end). Immanuel Kant's philosophy was based on deontological ethics- the idea that an action's claim to being right or wrong is independent of the consequences of that action. He believed that the consequences of an action offered no guide as to whether or not that action was moral, and was totally opposed to taking the consequences of an action into account. He wanted to develop a theory of ethics that relied on reason, as opposed to emotion- a theory that was universal, and could not be obscured by religion or personal interpretation. Kant took both rationalism and empiricism, and examined the good points of each. He thought that rationalists claimed too much for reason, and the empiricists emphasised sense experience too much. He thought that all our knowledge of the world comes from sensation, but our reason determines how we perceive the world around us. ...read more.


He believed this reward does not appear in this world, yet it must exist, otherwise we would not have a sense of duty. Kant concluded that we must look beyond this life. He believed the experience of a sense of moral law leads to our awareness of freedom, which becomes apparent when we make moral choices. These moral choices are independent of any thought of consequence, and Kant believed acting morally to be an end in itself. As Kant believed our duty was to make moral decisions and abide by moral law, he therefore believed duty not to be a means to an end, but an end in itself. Duty is an end that is known innately and instinctively. Kant therefore, came to the conclusion that 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty', as duty is not a means to an end, but an end in itself. b) 'Categorical Imperatives allow no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions'. Discuss The categorical imperative is the idea that one should 'Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law'- Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason. It is a command without conditions, and enforces that, for an action to be good it must stand up to the universal maxim test (above), and be suitably universalisable. ...read more.


This is using one human as a means to a desired end, and is strictly counter to the rules of the categorical imperative. Kant believed that the value of a human comes from their rational, reasonable being. The suffering, or in this case the end of the life of an individual, could never be justified by the fact that a greater number of people benefit. The implications of this principle are that any activity that denies the individual dignity of a human being in order to achieve its end is undeniably wrong. The idea of abortion and the termination of human life are contradictory to the absolute fundamental points of the categorical imperative- that human life is priceless, and that humans should never be treated as a means to an end, as they are an end in themselves. The action of an abortion is denying a human life of all dignity, value, and is certainly treating humanity as a means to the end of a childless life. Kant, and the categorical imperative therefore show absolutely no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions, as, even though, for example, the mother may not be a suitable parent, or the child's quality of life may be poor, under no circumstances, according to the principles of the categorical imperative, compassion can be allowed for women wishing to murder another human, denying them their worth, and using them as a means to an end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    For God to hold man morally accountable, yet to predestine everything that man thinks or does, something other than the "freedom of contraries" must ground this accountability. Calvinists believe that this something is the capacity of man to choose and act according to his moral state of being, the "freedom of choice".

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    Kant used the example of a shopkeeper to separate the idea of good behaviour and good will. A shopkeeper may be kind and friendly to you, but if he does this in order to make a profit it does not show good will, and is therefore not morally right.

  1. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    Doing one's duty is the right thing, not the wrong thing. We are to do our duty because, simply, it is our duty to do it. To perform a moral action out of desire for the good consequence it brings is to act in self-interest, and is not a morally good action.

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    If I universalised my telling of lies I would be logically destroying the accepted tradition that on this occasion I wished to break. Note that, for Kant, it is not my honour, or my friendship, or my friend's feelings that are at stake; what is at stake is the illogicality, the irrationality of the action when it becomes universalised.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Allow me to describe an actual clinical situation. A patient is 47, married, has a wife and two children. He is an industrial engineer. His son is 18, his daughter 16. His condition is polycystic kidney disease, a genetic disorder.

  2. The concept of hell makes no sense discuss

    Therefore everyone who isn't Christian and also some Christians who take the modern view of the Bible. This would mean an even smaller population would be saved. Various interpretations of the torments of Hell exist, ranging from fiery pits of wailing sinners to lonely isolation from God's presence.

  1. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    This has been similar throughout history. A key example of this is in the 2004 film Vera Drake, set in 1950. Vera (Imelda Staunton) dedicates her life to helping people. She takes care of her son, daughter, husband and elderly mother. She is a very respectful and kind woman-possibly a Christian.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of Duty as the basis of morality (33 marks).

    This is understandable because if we are doing it merely because we get something good out of it i.e. a reward or a good name then we are not doing it because we simply know it is the right thing to do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work