• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty.' Explain how Kant analysed this concept.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Charlotte Martin a) 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty.' Explain how Kant analysed this concept. 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty' implies, to quote F.H. Bradley, that duty should be done for 'duty's sake', and not for any consequential events. This approach to action is deontological, and concentrates solely on the process of an action (its means), not its possible outcome (its end). Immanuel Kant's philosophy was based on deontological ethics- the idea that an action's claim to being right or wrong is independent of the consequences of that action. He believed that the consequences of an action offered no guide as to whether or not that action was moral, and was totally opposed to taking the consequences of an action into account. He wanted to develop a theory of ethics that relied on reason, as opposed to emotion- a theory that was universal, and could not be obscured by religion or personal interpretation. Kant took both rationalism and empiricism, and examined the good points of each. He thought that rationalists claimed too much for reason, and the empiricists emphasised sense experience too much. He thought that all our knowledge of the world comes from sensation, but our reason determines how we perceive the world around us. ...read more.

Middle

He believed this reward does not appear in this world, yet it must exist, otherwise we would not have a sense of duty. Kant concluded that we must look beyond this life. He believed the experience of a sense of moral law leads to our awareness of freedom, which becomes apparent when we make moral choices. These moral choices are independent of any thought of consequence, and Kant believed acting morally to be an end in itself. As Kant believed our duty was to make moral decisions and abide by moral law, he therefore believed duty not to be a means to an end, but an end in itself. Duty is an end that is known innately and instinctively. Kant therefore, came to the conclusion that 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty', as duty is not a means to an end, but an end in itself. b) 'Categorical Imperatives allow no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions'. Discuss The categorical imperative is the idea that one should 'Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law'- Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason. It is a command without conditions, and enforces that, for an action to be good it must stand up to the universal maxim test (above), and be suitably universalisable. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is using one human as a means to a desired end, and is strictly counter to the rules of the categorical imperative. Kant believed that the value of a human comes from their rational, reasonable being. The suffering, or in this case the end of the life of an individual, could never be justified by the fact that a greater number of people benefit. The implications of this principle are that any activity that denies the individual dignity of a human being in order to achieve its end is undeniably wrong. The idea of abortion and the termination of human life are contradictory to the absolute fundamental points of the categorical imperative- that human life is priceless, and that humans should never be treated as a means to an end, as they are an end in themselves. The action of an abortion is denying a human life of all dignity, value, and is certainly treating humanity as a means to the end of a childless life. Kant, and the categorical imperative therefore show absolutely no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions, as, even though, for example, the mother may not be a suitable parent, or the child's quality of life may be poor, under no circumstances, according to the principles of the categorical imperative, compassion can be allowed for women wishing to murder another human, denying them their worth, and using them as a means to an end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. People should always do their duty. Explain how Kant understood this concept.

    You could be prejudice against different types of people. However, if you have "good will" and you are able to successfully apply this to all of your characteristics then they will be morally good. Therefore, if a murderer asked us where a future victim was, and we knew, then we must tell them regardless of whether the victim is your enemy, your friend or a loved one.

  2. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    To tell the truth, because it's in our interest to do so, isn't a moral action. Duty is good in itself. Kant acknowledged that happiness is also good, and that it comes as a reward for acting through good will, but that duty is the highest good.

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Socio-economic, religio-cultural backgrounds and experience of life may affect us in such a way that our behaviour is determined rather than free. Thus, if everything is predetermined does that mean we are left without any moral responsibility and give the murderer free scope to kill his victim without suffering any consequences?

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    At one time, hospitals were places where the victims of pulmonary tuberculosis came to spit their lives out. That common killer is now a thing of the past. But success has its price. One of our troubling problems is how to balance what we gain and what we lose when a new drug or therapeutic agent carries undesired side effects.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    The equality condition seems to be a necessary but not sufficient condition of any SL position. That it is insufficient is seen from the fact that it says nothing about the value of life as against other values. It is consistent with the view that the comfort of an elite,

  2. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    However, the other person that could be being used as a means to an end is the potential mother.

  1. The concept of hell makes no sense discuss

    (John 14:6). This would mean a relatively small number of the population are to be saved. Exclusivist Christians follow a similar view to fundamentalists although exclusivist Christians are much stricter in there views. They believe anyone who doesn't follow the Bible would be sent to Hell.

  2. Moral Consequences and Choices.

    Is the action still good? From a teleologist point of view, because the consequences were pleasing, the action would still be considered good. Another view is the Utilitarian view, which goes as far as self-sacrifice if necessary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work