• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Essay Question: In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters through which one perceives the world.

Extracts from this document...


Tan Wei Jie Joel (31) 3.11 Philosophy of Discipline Essay Question: In order to find out how things really are, one must understand the filters through which one perceives the world. I believe that we perceive and therefore know. We perceive through emotions, language and reason. These are also known as the ways of knowing. Thus, it is appropriate to use the Woolman's twelve ways of knowing to talk about perception. Reality is what we see, hear, smell, touch, taste and feel. It is what we observe around us using our senses and feelings. However, how do we know that we are really seeing reality and not our perception or something that our brain can accept and process? There are colors that our eyes cannot see for example ultra-violet and infrared-red. These colors are invisible to the human eye therefore we cannot see them. What we perceive is a clean Singapore. How do we actually know that Singapore is not littered with invisible rubbish? Of course, there are special devices that allow us to see these two colors and prove that there is no such rubbish. ...read more.


Thus is seeing really believing or believing is really seeing? Everyone has behaves differently because everyone is taught or programmed differently. Some people never let a vulgar word slip their lips others say it all day. This is due to the different programs stored in their conscience. For example, if your father who bought you up teaches you that stealing is wrong, you would perceive that stealing is wrong and thus your conscience pricks you when you are tempted to steal. However, what if the person who passes the information to you is ignorant and teaches you what he thinks is right and these turn out to be wrong? This boils down to authority and acquaintances. The drug addiction problem is because of incorrect perception. If your father brought you up teaching you that drugs is good for you, you will the perception that drugs is good and take drugs without it pricking your conscience, eventually fall into addiction of drugs. Therefore, are you able to trust your conscience or the persons who brought you up and helped program your conscience? ...read more.


The argument itself cannot prove that because it has already assumed it and to have assumed already what sets are out to prove would be to move in a vicious circle. Perception can be simplified into two basic questions. Is your perception true? Why is it true or false? Then you can ask yourself how do you perceive? We know through our five senses? These senses send impulses or messages to our brain from the outside word. The brain then interprets and creates the real world in our brain. How does the brain interpret the impulses or messages? It can be done through past experiences, social, cultural, religious communities, spatial familiarity for example patterns and shapes, biological limitations, existing learning structures, language and self perception such as how we think or what we believe. It is indeed doubtful whether anyone could live based on complete perception, or if they could, whether such a life would be worth living. However, this refutation of perception, if refutation it is, is not a logical argument. In practical life, we must steer a middle course between demanding a degree of certainty that we can never have and treating all possibilities as if they were of equal weight when they are not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. swinburne essay

    challenge doesn't get very far as he may have been or me may not, we can't find out for ourselves we just have accept what person making the claim is saying. These last two criticisms would therefore also appear to be overcome and Swinburne's argument who seem to be succeeding.

  2. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    of the species, education of children, living in a society and worshipping God. Despite the need for these to be followed, and, of course, definitive of how we make 'ethical decisions', it is the fifth that one finds enticing for this particular study.

  1. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    Criticism (not to sure about these) " I was thinking of writing a criticism based on the idea of are the bourgeois alienated and then a rejoinder from Marx about how they to are alienated." A criticism which can be held against both Marx and Engels and Sartre's views of

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    Although Plato seems to advocate a meritocratic oligarchy (although he wouldn't admit it), he doesn't recommend that his republic be based around money (also known as a plutocracy) where a small group of rich people, similar to an aristocracy, rule the lower classes.

  1. Do you find any of the arguments for cognitivism convincing?

    This means that Aristotle's definition of 'good' is to fulfill the function of your soul, which involves living a virtuous life. In general, these theories seem quite sensible, as naturalistic properties are a logical place to start within morality.

  2. Do you know you are reading this question?

    Such as knowledge being discovered through certainty. Descartes is another example of a foundationalist; his stance on the structure of knowledge was within the foundationalist camp. Descartes began by discovering certainty, and then discovering all knowledge using certainty as a base.

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    This gives examples of the things. > Socratic Irony: This is because he professes his ignorance and always looks for the truth. He says so because he wants to learn more & create an argument. > Ethics: This includes three main principles--> 1.

  2. Can a computer think? Really think?

    Furthermore, his lack of understanding goes to show, he argues, that 'computers do not understand Chinese neither, because they are in the same situation as he is. They are mindless manipulators of symbols, just as he is - and they do not understand what they are saying, just as he doesn't.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work