• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ethics needs rules. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Ethics needs rules. Discuss. There are two main branches to normative ethics, these being Relative and absolute ethics, both of which conflict with one another. For centuries scholars have battled with one another on whether ethics does need rules. Absolutists believe that there are universal rules that can be applied to every situation whereas relativists such as Fletcher believe that circumstances should be accounted for. Moral relativism is the belief that morality does not relate to any absolute standard of right or wrong, but that 'good' and 'bad' are dependant on culture and circumstance. There are many advantages to this belief, cultural diversity is an advantage as not every culture is going to be mirrored across the world, therefore many views are likely to conflict ( age of sexual consent differs) but moral relativism takes them into account. The majority of theories were established before the technological revolution that occurred in the 20th century and many absolute theories can now be seen as faulty or extreme due to the lack of flexibility, for example, one absolute rule is do not kill, therefore is abortion morally wrong? ...read more.


On the other hand, there are significant disadvantages to the flexibility of relativism and to rely solely on consequences rather than standards or morality. It is incredibly difficult to comprehend what the consequences of an action, and a 'wrong' action could lead to a good consequence. Also when one is personally involved in a situation it id difficult to be objective without being emotionally bias. Some people argue that to understand morality there must be an absolute standard of morality on order to judge some one against. This is where the strengths of absolutism lie. For absolutists an action is ALWAYS wrong or right, there are no exceptions and the rules that are laid are not to be broken in any circumstances in order to be moral. Kant held that there were absolute duties which were always right. He believed that we should consider whether our actions could be translated into a universal law before deciding what is right and wrong. ...read more.


Again there are disadvantages to this side of the argument as it refuses to take into account individual situation and sometimes a good consequence can become of a bad act, for example, stealing food to feed one's starving children. Absolutists would not look at the good consequence and just see the action as wrong. Whereas Utilitarians would say the claim the women was doing it for the greatest good for the greatest number so therefore it is justified. In conclusion we can see that absolute rules are needed in decisions, however in a modern day world it is not readily acceptable on its own. Many people will argue that we need to recognise the fact that there are special circumstances where the rules will not apply and we need to make room for these situations and act accordingly. Although there are disadvantages to every ethical theory, these disadvantages are better than absolute chaos that not having any rules would bring about. So in conclusion, ethics does need rules but just not absolute rules!!!! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Business Ethics

    Each of the major professional association for accountants has a code of ethics. Although ethical standards in accounting were always an issue in business the general public did not really pay attention to the issue in hand. Nevertheless recent events have brought the issues to the publics' attention, because some companies have not used full disclosure in their financial reporting.

  2. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    particular pain or pleasure in a particular situation to take precedence over the general rule whilst still bearing it in mind. Criticism five looks at sanctions, Bentham and Mill had contradicting ideas about sanctions, Bentham believed that external sanctions were more important than internal sanctions, he believed in public opinion and not conscience.

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    The opposing view to cosmopolitan morality is the fact that there will always be over-riding obligations from parent to child and friend to friend. There are some communities that have special obligations to each other. This would lead to the argument that there is a special obligation between the state

  2. Business Ethics

    The final one is the criterion of distributive justice. The manager's behaviour respects the rules of justice. It does not treat the people arbitrarily but rather equitably and fairly. These three criteria are also studied by Fritzsche, who made a model of ethical decision making.

  1. Absolutist Rules Always Good or Sometimes Bad?

    A man can be sentenced to death by public shooting (any man with legal ownership of a gun is allowed to take aim) for anything from espionage to violation of credentials (i.e., driving without a licence). To us, such severe punishment is wrong.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    The Roman Catholics Church would say permitting abortion may be killing a human entity who has a full entitlement to life. From the moment of conception, the nature of prenatal existence is merely the evolving of human growth and development, which does not cease until death.

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    If our moral rules work for us and theirs work for them, then there is nothing wrong with that. We can't judge them as being morally corrupt as their morals work for them. This leads us to be a more tolerant society.

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    says ?Why praise him if he would be equally as praiseworthy in doing the exact opposite? This is the Arbitrariness Problem. However, if you then say that things are morally right or wrong dependent of God, then there are also problems, because then what is the point of believing in God?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work