• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ethics needs rules. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Ethics needs rules. Discuss. There are two main branches to normative ethics, these being Relative and absolute ethics, both of which conflict with one another. For centuries scholars have battled with one another on whether ethics does need rules. Absolutists believe that there are universal rules that can be applied to every situation whereas relativists such as Fletcher believe that circumstances should be accounted for. Moral relativism is the belief that morality does not relate to any absolute standard of right or wrong, but that 'good' and 'bad' are dependant on culture and circumstance. There are many advantages to this belief, cultural diversity is an advantage as not every culture is going to be mirrored across the world, therefore many views are likely to conflict ( age of sexual consent differs) but moral relativism takes them into account. The majority of theories were established before the technological revolution that occurred in the 20th century and many absolute theories can now be seen as faulty or extreme due to the lack of flexibility, for example, one absolute rule is do not kill, therefore is abortion morally wrong? ...read more.


On the other hand, there are significant disadvantages to the flexibility of relativism and to rely solely on consequences rather than standards or morality. It is incredibly difficult to comprehend what the consequences of an action, and a 'wrong' action could lead to a good consequence. Also when one is personally involved in a situation it id difficult to be objective without being emotionally bias. Some people argue that to understand morality there must be an absolute standard of morality on order to judge some one against. This is where the strengths of absolutism lie. For absolutists an action is ALWAYS wrong or right, there are no exceptions and the rules that are laid are not to be broken in any circumstances in order to be moral. Kant held that there were absolute duties which were always right. He believed that we should consider whether our actions could be translated into a universal law before deciding what is right and wrong. ...read more.


Again there are disadvantages to this side of the argument as it refuses to take into account individual situation and sometimes a good consequence can become of a bad act, for example, stealing food to feed one's starving children. Absolutists would not look at the good consequence and just see the action as wrong. Whereas Utilitarians would say the claim the women was doing it for the greatest good for the greatest number so therefore it is justified. In conclusion we can see that absolute rules are needed in decisions, however in a modern day world it is not readily acceptable on its own. Many people will argue that we need to recognise the fact that there are special circumstances where the rules will not apply and we need to make room for these situations and act accordingly. Although there are disadvantages to every ethical theory, these disadvantages are better than absolute chaos that not having any rules would bring about. So in conclusion, ethics does need rules but just not absolute rules!!!! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Business Ethics

    Objectivity is a trait which requires accountants to be fair, unprejudiced and not influenced by any party (except by the code of ethics) in their assessment. As such, objectivity demands accountants to be cautious, thorough and careful in carrying out their duties and not be seen as to compromise their

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    shock the moral conscience of mankind."5 The government and the individuals of rich and powerful states, those who actually hold the power to make a difference, ought to help individuals no matter where they are. There is then the argument about distance, and how far one should go to help

  1. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    spend there time trying to work out the outcome because it's just a waste of time in general. Mill argued that the intention of the hedonistic calculus was not for it to be calculated in every situation but for it to be used as a general guiding rule.

  2. Absolutist Rules Always Good or Sometimes Bad?

    A man can be sentenced to death by public shooting (any man with legal ownership of a gun is allowed to take aim) for anything from espionage to violation of credentials (i.e., driving without a licence). To us, such severe punishment is wrong.

  1. Business Ethics

    On the other hand, companies use business ethics to motivate their employees. People are happier working for firms that they regard as ethical, and people are a firm's most valuable assets in today's business. They are implementing strategies like code of ethics and conduct, trainings, free and open atmosphere, feedback mechanisms in order to create an ethical corporate culture.

  2. Philosophy and Ethics: A look at Confucianism and Taoism and their Affects on the ...

    Desire, ambition, fame, and selfishness are all portrayed as vices and hindrances in one's life and are for such, better to be avoided. Taoists find no importance in materialistic items. If one is able to rid themselves of all desires, the Tao will be met.

  1. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    This was developed by St Augustine who maintained that the soul was implanted at 46 days and St Thomas Aquinas who contended ensoulments took place in boys at 40 days and girls 90 days.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    it means that all sorts of actions can be justified, depending on the time period or culture surrounding them. A positive of normative relativism though is that it means we become tolerant of other societies as we cannot look down on them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work