• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

Extracts from this document...


'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?' Euthanasia is inducing a painless death, by agreement and with compassion, to ease suffering. There are also four different kind of euthanasia; active, passive, voluntary and involuntary. Active euthanasia means carrying out some action to help someone to die, whereas passive euthanasia is to not carry out actions which would prolong life. Thus with regards to the above, voluntary euthanasia is helping a person who wishes to die to do so and involuntary euthanasia is helping a person to die when they are unable to request this for themselves. It is argued on a yearly basis as to whether euthanasia should be legalised in the United Kingdom. There are several arguments in favour for the legalisation of euthanasia. In voluntary euthanasia, it's argued that it shows mercy for those suffering with pain and a disease with no cure, a view which Thomas More (1478-1535) supports. In his book Utopia (1516), More argued that when a patient suffers 'a torturing and lingering pain, so that there is no hope, either of recovery or ease, they may choose rather to die, since they cannot live but in much misery'. It is an opportunity to end needless suffering, one that we already offer to animals, thus should be offered to humans. Other advocates of voluntary euthanasia argue that it should be an option for an adult who is able and willing to make such a decision (autonomy). ...read more.


Thus from this view point euthanasia shouldn't be legalised due to the risk of misinformation or a failure to comprehend the situation which would leave the patient vulnerable to a decision that he or she might not truly want to make. There are also arguments against the legalisation of euthanasia due to the risk of mistake that may occur, as we can't be certain that they would be avoided. For example, someone chooses death because they have been diagnosed with a fatal, incurable and painful illness. Then, after the person has died, it is discovered that the diagnosis was incorrect. Therefore, in the legalisation of euthanasia, the diagnosis would have to be beyond a doubt and it is questionable about whether there can always be medical certainty about what the condition will entail and how long it will take to develop. Thus, being an area of doubt that could lead to irreversible mistakes, euthanasia shouldn't be legalised to safeguard people against this. Glover (1977) noted that people who feel they are burdens on their families sometimes commit suicide. Thus it may be possible that elderly relatives who think they are burdens to their families ask for voluntary euthanasia out of a sense of duty to the family. It's also questionable as to whether, on the other hand, they could be pressured into asking for voluntary euthanasia by their relatives. As an example, the conviction of Harold Shipman who, as a doctor, murdered elderly patients over a period of years shows the power of doctors. ...read more.


However, some argue that allowing a disabled baby to live is to disable a family. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (November 2006) urged health professionals to consider euthanasia for seriously disabled babies to spare the emotional burden of families bringing them up. Critics of this are concerned that the example of actively killing a baby or withdrawing treatment to bring about death develops a culture in which all disabled people are considered to be of less value and thus dispute as to whether or not this should be legal. Answers of these questions are also sought through religion. Questions such as what do we do for the person who is in a coma with no hope for recovery? How do we care for the terminally ill who is in a lot of pain? These questions can be answered by Christianity and Islam. In Christianity, biblical teachings forbid killing (Sixth commandment). They also say that life should not be violated and there is also a powerful message of the importance of healing and care for the sick. However, there are exceptions for warfare and self-defence. There are also examples in the bible where the sacrifice of life is considered moral ('greater love has no man than this: That a man lay down his life for his friends' John 15:13). The bible does not prohibit all taking of life in all circumstances, although Christians have traditionally considered taking one's own life to be wrong. Thus is can be seen that Christians would accept euthanasia in certain circumstances. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    The 'double effect' occurs when a doctor gives a terminally ill patient a large dose of an opiate such as morphine that will ultimately lead to their death but they cannot be prosecuted for murder, as the primary intention is to ease the pain.

  2. Explain religious and ethical arguments in favour of Euthanasia

    Surely is would be more Christian to allow a patient an "easy death" rather than prolonging the pain of living. Catholics believe however, that suffering serves the purpose of bringing people closer to God, and allows them every chance to repent their sins.

  1. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    This links to euthanasia in the sense some people die involuntarily. Finally, an ethical issue involved in Euthanasia is that it will happen anyway so isn't it better to regulate it in someway. People say things like "we can't control drugs so we'd better legalise them", or "if we don't

  2. To what extent would a follower of Natural Law allow euthanasia?

    of ensoulment and some people would use this to argue that some terminally ill cannot be classed as full people anymore, so therefore have the right to die. As vegetable souls do not have sanctity of life, it can be argued that euthanasia would be acceptable according to Natural Law.

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    Whilst this would probably not affect the health of the donor, a lack of care and respect may have an impact on their mental wellbeing after the procedure, because they do not receive as much attention or support for their actions.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    suffering from psychotic delusions while waiting for their deaths and others so mentally underdeveloped that they request snow cones for their final meals. We continue to lower the age at which a child can be, criminally, treated as an adult and executed.

  1. Should euthanasia be legalised in the UK?

    Some people may find it hard to reason why their life is valuable in the first place. So because of this I don't think that the laws point about life being valuable is valid. There is juxtaposition between a terminally ill persons value of life and a healthy persons value of life, surely?

  2. Do you think Euthanasia should be legalised in the UK?

    A documentary crew recorded the suffering and loss of dignity that Dianne Pretty endured, and this made her case very well known in England. The main argument against euthanasia states that we should not interfere with the natural process of death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work