• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

Extracts from this document...


Compare, Contrast, and Evaluate Plato and Aristotle on human Well-being. Plato's ethics concerning well-being arise from the end of the discussion on justice where Thrasymachus articulates that justice is in fact merely a social contract whereby people agree not to inflict harm on others in return for not being harmed. Out of this rises the question well if this is all justice is, if it is only desirable for its consequences, In this case the avoidance of harm, then why shouldn't I cheat? If I can get away with it why wouldn't one cheat? Now follows the Gyges story, Glaucon puts it to Plato that if two men, one whom leads a life of virtue and one who doesn't, acquired a ring that could turn you invisible, even the virtuous man would not be able to resist acting immorally so therefore people are not actually virtuous, more just scared of the consequences of not being so. This is making the point that no man is so virtuous that he could resist the temptation of being able to steal at will by the ring's power of invisibility. In modern terms, Glaucon still argues that morality is a social construction, whose source is the desire to up hold one's reputation for virtue and honesty; when that sanction is removed, the moral character would evaporate. However Plato disagrees, he thinks the truly virtuous man would act morally and be happy and at peace with himself, even when the outcome may not be seen as in their best interests e.g. ...read more.


Upon gathering this information you are now and only after consulting the form, in a position to obtain an objectively correct answer. Does this mean that those whom don't have access to the forms of the virtues cannot be virtuous and in turn not achieve well-being? So in summary one must have the soul in the correct balance; this is the necessary and sufficient clause for well being and why is this the case because of the tri-partite nature of the soul. Aristotle's ethics are very similar to that of Plato's, sharing distinct similarities but also some differences. For Aristotle human-well being can also be translated as Eudemonia (flourishing). In book one Aristotle states that "that every art, every investigation and similarly every action and pursuit is aimed at some good" and that happiness is an activity of the soul according to virtue. As an early virtue theorist Aristotle believes a person should be judged on their character and not their actions. According to Aristotle virtue is something learned through constant practice beginning at a young age. To further understand this we should fully translate 'ar�te'-this is the word translated into 'virtue' in most English translations however the word more generally translates into excellence, so for example a musician will exhibit 'ar�te' in performing without any moral connotations. It logically follows that excellence in music cannot be reached simply by reading about it, it requires systematic practice and practical implementation. For Aristotle there is not necessarily an essential distinction between being virtuous and exercising a learned skill like playing an instrument, he believes that virtue is also a learned excellence (the highest learned excellence). ...read more.


Aristotle agrees with Plato that the good for anything that has a function relies on the implementing of that function. So it follows that Aristotle tries to work out if human beings have a function ("the function argument"). "Then do the carpenter and the leatherworker have their functions and actions, while a human being has none, and is by nature idle, without any function? Or, just as eye, hand, foot and, in general, every part apparently has its functions, may we likewise ascribe to a human being some function besides all theirs? (Nicomachean Ethics Book I Chapter 7 29-33)". So assuming that there is a function specific to humans Aristotle discounts sense perceptions because they are not only human traits. He concludes that the human function is to exhibit reason. The function of the excellent man to equal the function of any man the only difference is that the excellent man exhibits his function well. So For Aristotle, the human good seems to be synonymous with human well being. Thus, in order for a human being to be happy, he or she must live a life that successfully expresses reason. Here we see that both agree that to achieve well being, humans must fulfil their function but do they disagree on what that function is? Plato believing that it is living a just life and Aristotle that it is excellent reasoning, I think not, isn't being virtuous having reason ruling over the soul, surely this is the same as exhibiting excellent reason. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    Being a good person is not about seeking to follow formal rules. Macintyre proposed three questions as being at the heart of moral thinking 'Who am I?' 'Who ought I to become?' 'How ought I to get there?' Macintyre calls the virtues or qualities of character 'internal goods'.

  2. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    Free discussion in Mill's opinion will only aid us in getting closer to the truth, as who is to decide what is true if there is no proof? A combination of views, questions and opinions are better than one view or opinion that is decided to be true, and not questioned.

  1. Is active citizenship necessary to the achievement of eudaimonia?

    man, his acknowledgement that differences in various states means that there is no universal notion of a good citizen, and thus good citizenship cannot automatically equate to a good life. Whether a man is a good citizen or not is shaped by the state he is living in.

  2. How to create a completely peaceful world. To create a fully peaceful world, ...

    For example, no nation wanted to wage war from North America to the Middle East thousands of years ago. In fact, lots of nations were sort of isolated from the other nations. Thus, in the ancient time, there had no war of every nation against every nation.

  1. Does Aristotle regard the description of an ideal state and the analysis of actual ...

    His discussion of the value of Common Ownership is particularly interesting to us , as his objections to it as an ideal are almost solely on practical grounds. Aristotle's arguments here lend his discussion a firmly practical grounding, and we see clearly that Aristotle is not willing to allow pleasingly neat theories to supersede actuality in his political thought.

  2. Plato & The Soul

    However this provides one of the most serious and potentially defeating criticisms of Plato's views on the soul. He fails to address the issue of the interrelationship between body and soul, if they are indeed distinct. Does the soul act as controller of a lifeless body, or is there more to the body than simply the material.

  1. Free essay

    Explaining Aristotle

    It could also be asked what happens if the entity of the house is changed into something like a post office, or a bus shelter, then what is its purpose then? And is it right that there is only one purpose?

  2. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason

    Using Kant?s words, ?Everyone makes a deceitful promise when he finds himself in difficulty from which he cannot otherwise extract himself? (pg. 13, Kant), implies that universal law cannot contradict itself. Taking Kant?s example, if you lie, you cannot expect someone to believe you; this is not acting in ?maxim?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work