• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

Extracts from this document...


EVALUATE THE CLAIM THAT CONSCIENCE IS A RELABLE GIUDE IN ETHICAL DECISION MAKING. 45 MARKS. In order to decide whether or not our consciences can be relied upon, we must first examine what we mean by conscience. In order for conscience to be consistently and absolutely reliable, infallible, it must stem from an infallible source - God. Alternatively, conscience might have a potential of ultimate reliability, if the faculty of conscience was dynamic and capable of solving problems i.e. if it was an innate part of human nature. Conscience could even be totally fallible - an arbitrary by-product of experience and biology. This idea - propagated by such scientist-thinkers as Sigmund Freud and Piaget - does not dismiss the idea of conscience, but rather seeks to define it in psychoanalytical terms. Freud had a different word for the conscience - Super-Ego. In order to understand this concept, we must delve briefly into Freud's general psychological theories. According to Freud, every child is born with the 'Id'. The Id is that part of us which is based solely on the pleasure principle - ignoring all reality it seeks food, shelter or other physical gratification. As a child develops he or she will begin to realise that the needs of the Id cannot always be met, whether because of the restraints of physical reality or the emotional impact that the demands of the Id will have on others. ...read more.


He referred, in his first sermon, to the unique ability of conscience to evaluate and assess our motives without having motive in itself. However, he also saw conscience as an emotional imperative - it could inform us through our feelings of the value of our actions. Butler's great success was uniting the emotional and rational agents of conscience. Piaget very much believed in a teleological nature of the human body i.e. every part of the self has a purpose and, in the case of the mind, these purposes could be broadly categorised into private and public affections. Neither kind was wholly good, but, in a natural law sense, each was good in as much as it performed its function. For example, the private affection of hunger was good in that it promoted the good of the self through sustaining nutrition, but was obviously not intrinsically good. The private functions are all things which relate directly to the welfare of the self. The public functions - emotions like benevolence, 'indignation at successful vice', 'love of society' seem to relate more directly to the matter of conscience. They are the emotive arm of the conscience in that they provide an emotional imperative to fulfil the good 'functions' of each. ...read more.


This is a strong and capable view - this kind of conscience would be 'supremely' reliable, and it certainly justifies Newman's dictate that we should follow our consciences even before the Pope. The Cardinal did concede that the conscience was open and intended for training and informing, but really it is us who is being trained and informed - to hear the voice of God. Looking at all the possible views of conscience, I conclude that generally conscience is a reliable tool in making ethical decisions. Even mankind's weakest opinions of conscience admit that it is vital if we are to avoid causing offence within the society we inhabit. More importantly, those theories which consider conscience arbitrary or habitual tend to not believe in moral absolutes - which absolves the question of ethical decision of the weight otherwise ascribed to it. In other words, a relative view of conscience correlates with a relative view of ethics. Conscience is the most reliable, and mst useful, tool we have for making ethical decisions. ? ?(c) Jonathan May-Bowles - All work should be this colorful. Sponsored by the Campaign For Interesting Looking Work(tm) (02-10-02) ? ?(c) Jonathan May-Bowles - All work should be this colorful. Sponsored by the Campaign For Interesting Looking Work(tm) (02-10-02) ?(c) Jonathan May-Bowles - All work should be this colorful. Sponsored by the Campaign For Interesting Looking Work(tm) (02-10-02) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is the voice of God

    and Benevolence (seeking well being of others). The conscience encourages man away from selfish love and towards focussing on the interests and happiness of others. Butler held that the conscience enables us to judge and determine the rightness or wrongness of our actions.

  2. Analyse the arguments which philosophers use to claim that ethical language is not meaningful ...

    Exponents of absolutism often justify their ethical views simply on the basis that they just know; it is something, which is simply true. The problems, however, are evident; if anyone claims to have this moral intuition "invite him, then, to make a list of such rights or laws.

  1. How useful is Joseph Fletcher's "Situation Ethics"as a guide to human behaviour?

    and anger between the Protestants and Catholics is such a divide in the Christian religion. Situation ethics could help break down the barriers and unite a faith once again, as situation ethics main principle is love. Fletcher developed six fundamental principles.

  2. Discuss the claim that ethical and religious language is meaningless.

    He used John Wisdom's Parable of the Gardener to illustrate his point and argued that such reluctance by believers to see their assertions challenged, sounded the death knell to religious and ethical language claims. R.M. Hare however believed that the integrity of ethical and religious statements could be salvaged.

  1. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    A situation ethicist might agree on the grounds that this would be the most loving thing to do. Furthermore, we may question whether or not we have a duty to follow our conscience, when doing so would lead to our own death, as was the case for individuals such as Thomas More and J�gerst�tter.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    In this way, the logical positivists argued that all ethical statements, which rely on an understanding of 'good' and 'bad', are rendered meaningless. Some logical positivists developed this idea by saying that moral language was not only worthless, it was also nothing more than an expression of our opinion.

  1. Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

    A women may have been raped and requested an abortion, a follower of Natural Law would be prohibited from allowing her to proceed with this. Despite the women not wanting a baby, a follower of Natural Law would give her no other choice.

  2. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    It could potentially exonerate all wrong-doers on the basis they aren't to blame. Where are we to draw the line between a freely sadistic criminal and one who was conditioned to be this way? Similarly, in a different context, should I not revise for an exam on the basis that the result is predestined?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work