• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Fern Phillips U6CHA Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion. 35 marks William James defined a genuine religious experience as ?ineffable, noetic, transcient and passive?, with the sense of divine revelation and oneness?. Therefore, corporate religious experiences take place when this sense of awe and inexplicable wonder occurs among a group of people in the same location. One key objection to the validity of corporate religious experiences is the possibility of interpreting them in ways other than those put forward by believers. Bertrand Russell famously said that some people get drunk and see snakes, other people fast and see God. Corporate religious experiences seem more impressive than individual ones as a number of people experience them, making them easier to verify than individual ones, which are almost impossible to authenticate. A famous example of a corporate religious experience recorded the Bible is found in Acts chapter 2 verses 5 to 13, where the disciples were having a meeting in an ?upper room? and ?suddenly tongues of fire appeared above their heads, and they proceeded to ?speak in tongues?.? These ?tongues of fire? which appeared above the disciples? heads were Holy Spirit, which enabled them to speak in different ?tongues? or languages, so that they could preach to people of different nations. ...read more.

Middle

ask ourselves ?why would God want us to act like animals if he intended us to rule over and care for the animal kingdom?? After all, acting like animals doesn?t glorify God; rather it might be argued that it dishonours him and humiliates his creation. Whether religious experiences are personal experiences like visions or voices or are corporate in nature, one main criticism is that they rely on personal testimony, not empirical evidence. The issue here is the multitude of problems that surround taking personal testimony at face value. For example, I personally might want to believe someone who says that they saw a vision of Christ, but even if the person himself is not lying and entirely believes that they saw Christ, does this mean that they actually did see him and the vision was not caused by lack of sleep, drugs, or a psychotic episode. Schizophrenia is a mental condition in which it is common to feel that God is speaking to you, or that you have been chosen by God in some way. All of these factors diminish the validity of personal testimonies. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion therefore, I can see why some believe corporate religious experiences to be true since some people having these remember them and it is more convincing when more than one person has the same experiences. Also speaking in ?tongues? is mentioned in the Bible and some positive results may ensue from these experiences. However, in my opinion modern day examples of corporate and individual religious experiences are merely an illusion and can mostly be explained by science and psychology. For example, the Toronto Blessing could merely be a result of hypnotism, and as for the golden teeth, it hasn?t been proved that the people concerned didn?t already have gold teeth. Also, behaving like animals is not mentioned in the Bible as a sign of the Holy Spirit working, convincing me that this has nothing to do with God. In fact, a lot of hypnotists can cause people to behave like animals under hypnosis, so might this not be the case here? As for healing rallies, this can be explained by crowd manipulation, peer pressure and mass hysteria. However, I do believe that the religious experience that occurred on Pentecost 33 AD was genuine because it had a divine purpose, to continue the preaching work started by Jesus Christ. Philosophy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    So if we came across a proposition that we were unsure about what it said about the world, we would class it as meaningless. However if we look towards scientific claims, such as water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, problems start to rise.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    And yet he is to be compelled to pay". Darrow was successful and got them just a life sentence. This example shows that the boys had no free will and shows that it is just an illusion. However libertarians also disagree with Darrow's argument and we do make our actions.

  1. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    The principle of credulity holds that if one cannot find any reason to disbelieve an event, one should wholly believe that it is occurring. Thus Jesus' resurrection or the Toronto Blessing would fall under this category to the religious believer.

  2. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    a gardener if such a belief cannot be verified or even falsified? The sceptic's frustration at the believer's assertions suggests that as the experience itself does not differ, it is merely personal interpretation and the projection of the desire for a gardener that has created such a being.

  1. Writing to argue.

    * The key to a successful argument is to plan well, making sure you release your various points in a progressively convincing order. Try to show that you have planned or, as the examiner's put it: "consciously shaped your response".

  2. Assess the claim that mental states cannot be reduced to physical states.

    If two people have the same stimulus, arm being cut off, then just because one of them (the ?Super Spartan?) shows no outward signs of pain, doesn?t mean they have no behaviour ? on the contrary ? they would have been disposed to show no pain, a pain behaviour in

  1. Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    logic), then the individual is at danger of allowing religion and the believer to become a void of scrutiny. However, Swinburne?s five categories of religious experience are inherently useful to both the believer and the secularist, as they are a step towards a rationalisation of the experience.

  2. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    can only rely on probability for an answer which may not necessarily be true. When we see a series of random dots, some of us may see it form into a face while another will see it to form into something entirely different.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work