• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Fern Phillips U6CHA Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion. 35 marks William James defined a genuine religious experience as ?ineffable, noetic, transcient and passive?, with the sense of divine revelation and oneness?. Therefore, corporate religious experiences take place when this sense of awe and inexplicable wonder occurs among a group of people in the same location. One key objection to the validity of corporate religious experiences is the possibility of interpreting them in ways other than those put forward by believers. Bertrand Russell famously said that some people get drunk and see snakes, other people fast and see God. Corporate religious experiences seem more impressive than individual ones as a number of people experience them, making them easier to verify than individual ones, which are almost impossible to authenticate. A famous example of a corporate religious experience recorded the Bible is found in Acts chapter 2 verses 5 to 13, where the disciples were having a meeting in an ?upper room? and ?suddenly tongues of fire appeared above their heads, and they proceeded to ?speak in tongues?.? These ?tongues of fire? which appeared above the disciples? heads were Holy Spirit, which enabled them to speak in different ?tongues? or languages, so that they could preach to people of different nations. ...read more.

Middle

ask ourselves ?why would God want us to act like animals if he intended us to rule over and care for the animal kingdom?? After all, acting like animals doesn?t glorify God; rather it might be argued that it dishonours him and humiliates his creation. Whether religious experiences are personal experiences like visions or voices or are corporate in nature, one main criticism is that they rely on personal testimony, not empirical evidence. The issue here is the multitude of problems that surround taking personal testimony at face value. For example, I personally might want to believe someone who says that they saw a vision of Christ, but even if the person himself is not lying and entirely believes that they saw Christ, does this mean that they actually did see him and the vision was not caused by lack of sleep, drugs, or a psychotic episode. Schizophrenia is a mental condition in which it is common to feel that God is speaking to you, or that you have been chosen by God in some way. All of these factors diminish the validity of personal testimonies. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion therefore, I can see why some believe corporate religious experiences to be true since some people having these remember them and it is more convincing when more than one person has the same experiences. Also speaking in ?tongues? is mentioned in the Bible and some positive results may ensue from these experiences. However, in my opinion modern day examples of corporate and individual religious experiences are merely an illusion and can mostly be explained by science and psychology. For example, the Toronto Blessing could merely be a result of hypnotism, and as for the golden teeth, it hasn?t been proved that the people concerned didn?t already have gold teeth. Also, behaving like animals is not mentioned in the Bible as a sign of the Holy Spirit working, convincing me that this has nothing to do with God. In fact, a lot of hypnotists can cause people to behave like animals under hypnosis, so might this not be the case here? As for healing rallies, this can be explained by crowd manipulation, peer pressure and mass hysteria. However, I do believe that the religious experience that occurred on Pentecost 33 AD was genuine because it had a divine purpose, to continue the preaching work started by Jesus Christ. Philosophy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    Strong Verification states that a statement is meaningful if we could verify it by our own observation and therefore establish its truth or falsity for certain. Whereas Weak Verification states that a statement is meaningful if there are some observations that could establish the probable truth of the statement.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    The plan went wrong and the boys were caught. Darrow pleaded that the two young boys were the product of their upbringing, their ancestry and their wealthy environment-"he did not make himself. And yet he is to be compelled to pay".

  1. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    If there is no obvious event, instead of discounting the experience, many religious believers would find another meaning or an insignificant event that only serves the experience rather than the other way round. Richard Swinburne, with his 'principle of credulity' and 'principle of testimony' perfectly exemplify the previous point.

  2. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    For a posteriori reasoning to be valid it appears that it must entail the possibility of being analysed effectively and thereby be vulnerable to falsification. However, the fact that religious experience does not fulfil this criterion implies that its value holds only when used in conjunction with faith and an already established belief in God.

  1. Writing to argue.

    views are well thought out - just not quite as well thought out as your own. This is a skilful and subtle approach. * Using a humorous or vivid - but entirely reasonable and realistic - anecdote to illustrate a point can be an excellent way of countering the opposite point of view, e.g.

  2. Does Religious Experience offer a convincing argument for God

    main qualities, doesn?t this back up the argument for the existence of God? If someone experiences such things that changes their life, improves their understanding and is impossible to express successfully in normal language, this must mean that something with much more power has come in contact with them enabling them to these changes, that something being God.

  1. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    This shows the nature of God being omnipotent, He wants people to have faith in Him so He takes away scientific evidence and gave us free will to accept or reject Him. "We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way" (Isaiah 53:6)

  2. Assess the claim that mental states cannot be reduced to physical states.

    If two people have the same stimulus, arm being cut off, then just because one of them (the ?Super Spartan?) shows no outward signs of pain, doesn?t mean they have no behaviour ? on the contrary ? they would have been disposed to show no pain, a pain behaviour in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work