• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that the existence of natural evil in the world makes it impossible to believe in a God who is all-loving and all powerful

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Evaluate the claim that the existence of natural evil in the world makes it impossible to believe in a God who is all-loving and all powerful (20) One of the main arguments used by non believers against the existence of God is based on the presence of evil and suffering in the world; however there is a distinction between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil can be explained to an extent by the Augustinian and Irenaean theodicy?s and the free will defence. Augustine argued that evil did not come from God since God?s creation was faultless and perfect, and as evil came from elsewhere God is justified in allowing it to stay. He argued that evil came from Adam when he picked the fruit in the garden of Eden, and as we are all seminally present in the loins of Adam we have inherited original sin, and evil comes from this. He states ?Evil then is an accident?. The Irenaean theodicy argued by John Hick argues that evil is ?soul-making? and so God is justified in allowing it to stay as it has a purpose. ...read more.

Middle

Peter manning states ?natural evils provide opportunities for the exercise of morally good behaviour ?which move humanity further toward the possession of God?s likeness?. Natural evils, such as volcanoes and earthquakes, provide humans with the opportunity to display courage, love and goodness. John Hick concludes that the world is not ?designed for the maximisation of human pleasure and minimisation of human pain, it may nevertheless be rather well adapted to the quite different purpose of ?soul-making??. The existence of natural evil does not make it impossible to believe in a God that is all loving and all powerful, as, in the words of Irenaeus, ?How, if we had no knowledge of the contrary, could we have instruction in that which is good? . Lastly, Peter Vardy would claim that the existence of natural evil does not make it impossible to believe in an all loving, all powerful God as what we perceive as natural ?evil? is actually the world doing what it is supposed to. According to Genesis, ?And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good?. Therefore, a massive tidal wave like the Tsunami was just being a ?good? tidal wave, as it is supposed to; a massive earthquake is just being a ?good? earthquake. ...read more.

Conclusion

Rowe states ?there exist instances of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented?an omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could?therefore there does not exist an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good being?. Depending on your faith and beliefs, the existence of natural evil may make it impossible for you to believe in an all loving all powerful God. However, process thought explains that God is not omnipotent, but that he is all good. Process thought argues that God persuaded the world into a state of greater order from matter, and as God is not the creator of natural laws including natural evil, then God is limited within these laws and is not omnipotent. However, God can exist alongside evil, as God suffers as well. A. N. Whitehead describes him as ?the fellow sufferer who understands?. When natural evils occur, His creative desires are frustrated. It is impossible for an all loving all powerful God to exist alongside natural evil, however for a God who simply is not powerful enough to intervene, he can exist alongside natural evil. To conclude, whether you believe natural evil makes it impossible to believe in an all loving all powerful God depends on your faith, beliefs and whether you believe God is all loving and all powerful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Goodness of God

    God's goodness demands that mankind worship only one God and nothing or nobody else "You shall have no other gods before me and you shall not make for yourself an idol." (Exodus 20: 3-4). These commandments show that God is the primary source governing how people should lead their lives because God is both morally and skilfully good.

  2. HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE AUGUSTINIAN THEODICY IN EXPLAINING THE EXISTENCE OF EVIL & SUFFERING ...

    Therefore it would be wrong to say that all humans are the same as Adam. Furthermore, there are logical criticisms of Augustine's theodicy. If evil is not a thing in itself, then good and evil would unknown to Adam and Eve in the 'Garden of Eden'.

  1. problem of evil

    A quote from Swimburne on the Problem of Evil, 'There is a problem about why God allows evil, and if the theist doesn't have (in a cool moment) a satisfactory answer to it, then his belief in God is less than rational and there is no reason why the atheist should share it.'

  2. Problem of evil

    which accepts that the child may have to suffer to get to greater good of being freed from his cancer but that he should not be stabbed straight after. It can accept that a stolen purse or wallet leads us to be cautious in future but what of the Gulag and the Holocaust?

  1. Explain and evaluate Augustine's Theodicy

    see in a perfect world with no knowledge of good and evil that there is freedom to obey and disobey God. Evil and good were unknown to Adam and Eve, so how would they know what is the right or wrong thing?

  2. Solutions to the problem of evil. The Problem of Evil states that because ...

    "Man's life is a line that nature commands him to describe upon the surface of the earth, without his ever being able to swerve from it, even for an instant." (Holbach 462) Holbach believes that all events are predetermined from previous events and that we have no free will because we could not have chosen differently than we did.

  1. Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

    In a way this is similar to parenting, the majority of parents will have to punish their children and those children might think that the punishment is ?evil? or unjust, however the parents will ?usually- have a good motive behind the punishment, a good benevolent motive which is typically used

  2. The world appears designed, so God exists - Discuss

    This being we call God. In Aquinas? analogy of the archer, he is also essentially reaching the conclusion that a guiding intelligence must lie behind the universe. Since the universe is unintelligent, yet seems to be goal-directed like the arrow, then it must also have a guiding intelligence, just like the arrow has an archer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work