• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that the existence of natural evil in the world makes it impossible to believe in a God who is all-loving and all powerful

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Evaluate the claim that the existence of natural evil in the world makes it impossible to believe in a God who is all-loving and all powerful (20) One of the main arguments used by non believers against the existence of God is based on the presence of evil and suffering in the world; however there is a distinction between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil can be explained to an extent by the Augustinian and Irenaean theodicy?s and the free will defence. Augustine argued that evil did not come from God since God?s creation was faultless and perfect, and as evil came from elsewhere God is justified in allowing it to stay. He argued that evil came from Adam when he picked the fruit in the garden of Eden, and as we are all seminally present in the loins of Adam we have inherited original sin, and evil comes from this. He states ?Evil then is an accident?. The Irenaean theodicy argued by John Hick argues that evil is ?soul-making? and so God is justified in allowing it to stay as it has a purpose. ...read more.


Peter manning states ?natural evils provide opportunities for the exercise of morally good behaviour ?which move humanity further toward the possession of God?s likeness?. Natural evils, such as volcanoes and earthquakes, provide humans with the opportunity to display courage, love and goodness. John Hick concludes that the world is not ?designed for the maximisation of human pleasure and minimisation of human pain, it may nevertheless be rather well adapted to the quite different purpose of ?soul-making??. The existence of natural evil does not make it impossible to believe in a God that is all loving and all powerful, as, in the words of Irenaeus, ?How, if we had no knowledge of the contrary, could we have instruction in that which is good? . Lastly, Peter Vardy would claim that the existence of natural evil does not make it impossible to believe in an all loving, all powerful God as what we perceive as natural ?evil? is actually the world doing what it is supposed to. According to Genesis, ?And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good?. Therefore, a massive tidal wave like the Tsunami was just being a ?good? tidal wave, as it is supposed to; a massive earthquake is just being a ?good? earthquake. ...read more.


Rowe states ?there exist instances of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented?an omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could?therefore there does not exist an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good being?. Depending on your faith and beliefs, the existence of natural evil may make it impossible for you to believe in an all loving all powerful God. However, process thought explains that God is not omnipotent, but that he is all good. Process thought argues that God persuaded the world into a state of greater order from matter, and as God is not the creator of natural laws including natural evil, then God is limited within these laws and is not omnipotent. However, God can exist alongside evil, as God suffers as well. A. N. Whitehead describes him as ?the fellow sufferer who understands?. When natural evils occur, His creative desires are frustrated. It is impossible for an all loving all powerful God to exist alongside natural evil, however for a God who simply is not powerful enough to intervene, he can exist alongside natural evil. To conclude, whether you believe natural evil makes it impossible to believe in an all loving all powerful God depends on your faith, beliefs and whether you believe God is all loving and all powerful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Goodness of God

    God's goodness demands that mankind worship only one God and nothing or nobody else "You shall have no other gods before me and you shall not make for yourself an idol." (Exodus 20: 3-4). These commandments show that God is the primary source governing how people should lead their lives because God is both morally and skilfully good.


    Therefore it would be wrong to say that all humans are the same as Adam. Furthermore, there are logical criticisms of Augustine's theodicy. If evil is not a thing in itself, then good and evil would unknown to Adam and Eve in the 'Garden of Eden'.

  1. problem of evil

    These three statements cannot all be true so it would seem that one of them is false, but since we know evil and suffering exist the inconsistency must lie in one of the other 2 points.

  2. Problem of evil

    Like a child with leukemia being put through kimo-therapy, he suffers, yet in the end he is rid of his cancer.

  1. Explain and evaluate Augustine's Theodicy

    He still says God created all things, continuing to argue that he originally created them all good. Augustine also understood evil to be a term called "private boni", which means a "privation of good". Evil is the going wrong of something that is good in itself for Augustine.

  2. Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

    That is the basis of Irenaen ?soul-making? theodicy, he said that evil was needed for the soul to be able to form and become ?noble?, that we must make the choice to lead good lives and follow the way of God ourselves.

  1. Solutions to the problem of evil. The Problem of Evil states that because ...

    When free will is good it is known as Good Will. Without free will, we would have no choice of action and everything we do would be predetermined; this is Determinism. Determinism is considered to be incompatible with free will.

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    The murderer or the one who helps the homeless? Or are they both equal in the sense of personhood? On the other hand, there would inevitably be people who disagree with this idea of how a being is defined to be a person as it wouldn?t be fair to use this on those who are less able than others,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work