• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body: There are two views in terms of the soul: dualists and monists/materialists. Dualists believe that there is a non-physical soul and life after death is possible, whereas monists believe that human beings are made only of physical substances and reject this idea of life after death. Plato is one of the most famous dualists? of all time. He argued that there are two aspects of humans ? their soul and their body. He believed that the soul was more important than the body because unlike the body, the soul is eternal and gives us real knowledge of the forms. Plato put forward two arguments to show that the soul is immortal and can exist outside of the body. Firstly, his argument from knowledge states that learning is a matter of remembering what the soul has already experienced, as humans we can recognise things that are equal e.g. one grain of sand to another, yet we haven?t experienced the form of equals and things such as maths and science are true even before we can prove it. ...read more.

Middle

It makes rational sense that we would come up with a way that ensured we could see/contact our loved ones again in order to bring about comfort. Descartes was a Cartesian Dualist and rationalist ? he believed that true knowledge can only be gained through the use of reason and rational thought. Descartes was born in a time of great scepticism, where everybody doubted everything, to the extent that Descartes started to doubt the existence of his own body. One thing he couldn?t doubt though, was his ability to think, he couldn?t doubt that he existed because that required him to think for himself, therefore he concluded that we must be more than merely a physical shell. This is where his famous quote: ?cognito ergo sum? (I think therefore I am) derives from. He concluded that the mind must exist and must be distinct from the material and bodily substance. The mind is the place in which all feelings, sensations and thoughts are known only to the person experiencing them. The body however, performs all physical activities which are observable to all. Descartes dedicated much of his time to the study of the pineal gland to which he named: the seat of the soul. ...read more.

Conclusion

His theory was therefore labelled as heresy and disregarded. Hick?s theory has many flaws, lack of evidence being one of them, another being that individuals with Alzheimer?s, according to Hick?s thoughts, have no soul ? so how could they be replicated? There is a lot of evidence that suggests the soul is distinct from the body in the sense that we all have our own personal identity, identical twins are physically exactly the same but at the same time two different people. There is something non-physical that makes one distinct from the other. However, this does not mean that the soul and the body are two separate entities. I do not wish to deny that the soul exists, rather I deny that the two are separate entities. Plato and Descartes are in the minority and there is by far more evidence that supports the monist/materialistic belief that the body is enhanced by the soul, in the same sense that the colour red is enhanced by red objects ? one cannot survive without the other. Therefore I conclude that the soul is not distinct from the body ? the soul cannot survive without the body, but the body can survive without the soul e.g. psychopaths and individuals with Alzheimer?s. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body. ...

    Secondly, recollection, Plato believed that the knowledge we acquire is not learnt, but it is remembered, he also believed that the soul existed in a realm before coming into the body and then the knowledge is acquired.

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Plato made two contributions to the theory of knowledge. One was that knowledge is recollecting what is in your head already, not perceiving new things. The other was his theory of forms. Plato faced two major problems when he came to consider what true knowledge is. A philosophical problem; he has to reconcile the problem of One and the

  1. Body soul destinction

    He believed that the body and soul were separate and described the soul as that which animates the body or 'anima.' According to Aquinas, the soul operates independently of the body. Aquinas believed the only things that are divisible into parts decay.

  2. Comparison of Plato and Aristotle's views of how knowledge is obtained and the body ...

    They only eat and drink that is necessary and wear simple clothes as they are more interested in the soul. Plato believed that the soul is immortal. It exists before, during and after it is trapped in the body. It has to pre-exist the body because it is unchanging, so

  1. Assess the claim 'Our lives are determined'

    In my view this claim is one I agree with, not only is there physical evidence to support the claim but it also empowers us with responsibility. If we were to view the world through a determinists eyes we would have no responsibility, this would simply not work because if

  2. Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - ...

    This is known as Plato?s ?Doctrine of Recollection?. Secondly, the foundation of Plato?s Phaedo is that ?like gives rise to like?. This illustrates that a body is made from physical material whereas the soul on the other hand is made from an intellectual and non-physical reality.

  1. Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and immortality of the soul. (18)

    as illustrated in his parable of Celestial city: neither can prove the road leads to Celestial City until they reach the end of the road. However this just reinforces Davies and Ayer?s criticisms since this argument cannot be proved nor disproved as it cannot be tested either way.

  2. Assess the claim that mental states cannot be reduced to physical states.

    Occasionalism does not mention God doing this, but only that mental thoughts and physical actions should correlate. Is one also forced to believe in a god to accepted substance dualism, and what happens to the mind after the death of the body?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work