• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body: There are two views in terms of the soul: dualists and monists/materialists. Dualists believe that there is a non-physical soul and life after death is possible, whereas monists believe that human beings are made only of physical substances and reject this idea of life after death. Plato is one of the most famous dualists? of all time. He argued that there are two aspects of humans ? their soul and their body. He believed that the soul was more important than the body because unlike the body, the soul is eternal and gives us real knowledge of the forms. Plato put forward two arguments to show that the soul is immortal and can exist outside of the body. Firstly, his argument from knowledge states that learning is a matter of remembering what the soul has already experienced, as humans we can recognise things that are equal e.g. one grain of sand to another, yet we haven?t experienced the form of equals and things such as maths and science are true even before we can prove it. ...read more.

Middle

It makes rational sense that we would come up with a way that ensured we could see/contact our loved ones again in order to bring about comfort. Descartes was a Cartesian Dualist and rationalist ? he believed that true knowledge can only be gained through the use of reason and rational thought. Descartes was born in a time of great scepticism, where everybody doubted everything, to the extent that Descartes started to doubt the existence of his own body. One thing he couldn?t doubt though, was his ability to think, he couldn?t doubt that he existed because that required him to think for himself, therefore he concluded that we must be more than merely a physical shell. This is where his famous quote: ?cognito ergo sum? (I think therefore I am) derives from. He concluded that the mind must exist and must be distinct from the material and bodily substance. The mind is the place in which all feelings, sensations and thoughts are known only to the person experiencing them. The body however, performs all physical activities which are observable to all. Descartes dedicated much of his time to the study of the pineal gland to which he named: the seat of the soul. ...read more.

Conclusion

His theory was therefore labelled as heresy and disregarded. Hick?s theory has many flaws, lack of evidence being one of them, another being that individuals with Alzheimer?s, according to Hick?s thoughts, have no soul ? so how could they be replicated? There is a lot of evidence that suggests the soul is distinct from the body in the sense that we all have our own personal identity, identical twins are physically exactly the same but at the same time two different people. There is something non-physical that makes one distinct from the other. However, this does not mean that the soul and the body are two separate entities. I do not wish to deny that the soul exists, rather I deny that the two are separate entities. Plato and Descartes are in the minority and there is by far more evidence that supports the monist/materialistic belief that the body is enhanced by the soul, in the same sense that the colour red is enhanced by red objects ? one cannot survive without the other. Therefore I conclude that the soul is not distinct from the body ? the soul cannot survive without the body, but the body can survive without the soul e.g. psychopaths and individuals with Alzheimer?s. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Thus, without any necessary exchange of matter, the soul takes on the form of the object: when I feel the point of a pin, its shape makes an impression on my finger, conveying this form to my sensitive soul (resulting in information).

  2. Comparison of Plato and Aristotle's views of how knowledge is obtained and the body ...

    They only eat and drink that is necessary and wear simple clothes as they are more interested in the soul. Plato believed that the soul is immortal. It exists before, during and after it is trapped in the body. It has to pre-exist the body because it is unchanging, so

  1. Assess the claim 'Our lives are determined'

    Sartre claims that 'A human being is absolutely free and absolutely responsible. Anguish is the result.' This is to say that feelings of dread and nervousness are primarily there to remind humans that we do have a choice in every situation; there is no a priori nature that overrides our decision making.

  2. Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

    Hindu's believe that the atman or soul is in 'samsara' - the cycle of life and death, being reborn in different bodies depending on the law of Karma i.e. how their life was lived. Hindu's believed that Brahman is the true reality, and it's the goal of life to reunite our atman with him: this is called Moksha.

  1. Plato & The Soul

    Forms bear a resemblance to the simple, immutable entities, such as beauty; however a beautiful painting is transient and palpable. The body shows an affinity to the composite by nature of its mortality and mutability; just as the soul shows a similar affinity to immortality and indivisibleness.

  2. Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and immortality of the soul. (18)

    such as his ability to enter a house where the doors were all closed. However, it could be argued that the bible is simply confused and contains no facts of the afterlife, for instance Dawkins argues that the bible is by ?hundreds of anonymous authors, editors and copyists, unknown to

  1. Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - ...

    AO2: Immortality of the Soul and Resurrection of the body are both subject to complications, but to what extent is one of these a more convincing form of life after death than the other? Only few examples of resurrection are depicted in the Bible, most importantly when Jesus shows himself

  2. Assess the claim that mental states cannot be reduced to physical states.

    Occasionalism does not mention God doing this, but only that mental thoughts and physical actions should correlate. Is one also forced to believe in a god to accepted substance dualism, and what happens to the mind after the death of the body?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work