• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the weaknesses of design arguments for the existence of God

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the weaknesses of design arguments for the existence of God (9) The design argument is an a posteriori argument for the existence of god based on apparent design and purpose in the universe. The argument is based on an interpretation of teleology where in purpose and intelligent design appears to exist in nature beyond the scope of any such human activities. The teleological argument suggests that, given the premise, the existence of a designer can be assumed, typically presented as God. It is an inductive argument which means that we learn something new and it goes beyond the truth of the premise which may or may not be a good thing. The fall of it going beyond the truth of the premise is that we can never fully trust the conclusion which may mean that we cannot fully justify and explain the argument. ...read more.

Middle

Even though the design argument is a feature of the natural theology it may be able to convince those who do not believe religion. The reason is that the argument doesn't use any holy scriptures but this could be disbelieved as evidence of the natural world cannot be used as proof also. William Paley, who was Archdeacon of Carlisle, used an analogy of someone coming across a watch on a heath. In his analogy he said, if that person was to look down and see a watch would they question the designer of that watch? They would notice how the watch worked in order to tell the time, and would conclude that there must have been an intelligent designer to have made this watch. ...read more.

Conclusion

If someone comes across a machine they assume that it has more than one designer, therefore there should be more than one God. Charles Darwin is the proponent of the theory of Natural Selection. Darwinism thus postulates that the fittest and healthiest members of society survive and their characteristics are passed down giving the appearance of design in the universe Richard Dawkins, a biological materialist and reductionists, supported Darwin by arguing that random mutations in DNA alone give rise to variation in the world and the illusion of design. For Dawkins, life amounts to nothing more than bytes of digital information contained in the quaternary code, DNA. Darwinism presents a challenge to arguments from design, because it suggests an alternative reason why creatures seem to be so well suited for their purposes. When evaluating the weaknesses of design arguments for the existence of god, ?? ?? ?? ?? Kerrie Freeman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay makes a number of good points and makes a number of decent attempts to evaluate throughout. This is the key to getting marks for this sort of essay, which explicitly asks for evaluation. The response is rather brief though. More arguments could be discussed, both to display knowledge and to give the students something more to talk about in their evaluation. The essay would be improved by making a clear attempt to weigh up the pros and cons of the arguments discussed and to attempt an overall conclusion. This is suggested by the essay question. As the question specifically asks one to evaluate the weaknesses of the design argument, the introductory material and explanations are irrelevant, further limiting the useful content of the essay. Focus on this would be required to get a top mark in the essay. It would also be ideal to offer an original argument as to whether the weaknesses are fatal overall or not to the argument.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    Fourth, "only ends justify the means, nothing else." Fletchers feelings about love is Agape love, meaning unconditional and nothing is required in return. Fifth, "love wills the neighbor's good, whether we like him or not." this means to use things as a means to an end, not as an end itself.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    We would then have to judge the consequences themselves. When results occur, we must still ask whether they are good or bad results. Utilitarianism provides no objective and reliable grounds to judge results because results are the mechanism used to judge the action itself.

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    The prisoners represent most people, who do not question, and are content within their "comfort zone". However, the prisoner who is let free, is a philosopher, namely Socrates, who is inquisitive and prepared to venture into the unknown. His first movements are painful because this shows how is hard to

  2. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    Kant did not criticise Anselm, although he may have had access to his work, he instead attacked Descartes formulation of the argument. Descartes, in the midst of doubting all he knew, famously reaching the conclusion "Cogito ergo sum", thought that if he could know of God, he could work forward

  1. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    way that it had the last say when it comes to moral decision making. Butler described a hierarchy of human nature in which the desire for food and other animal instincts are at the bottom and the conscience at the top.

  2. Critically assess the problems for believers who say that God is omniscient

    He does not know what moral choices we will make in advance, as there is no such thing as 'in advance' for God; all events occur simultaneously to God in His eternal presence. As God does not know things in advance of them happening it makes no sense to talk

  1. Do we perceive the world directly?

    table as being brown in colour, as apposed to seeing blue or pink. This shows that we do still perceive the object and its property directly. The flaws with both of these arguments do seem strong enough to pick the arguments against direct realism apart.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    Logical positivists only accepted two forms of verifiable language; analytical propositions ( a priori), knowledge is gained through logical reasoning. These definitions are true by definition, e.g. ?all bachelors are unmarried?. We know this to be true because bachelor means that a man is unmarried.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work