• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evolution V teleological Argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The evolution argument goes against the existence on God claiming the existence of the universe and everything within was because of evolution derived from Charles Darwin's Theory of evolution. It is also supported by followers of Richard Dawkins. Religious believers are of the teleological argument and believe that God created the universe and everything in it but this is much open to criticisms evolution believers as they argue there is no proof for the existence of God and they argue that where did God come from and who made God? Teleological believers argue that God was necessary has all ways been there and the universe is contingent. ...read more.

Middle

They argue that the first cell could not have just appeared and there must have been something which created the first cell. This again supports the existence of God and the design argument. The creator of the theory of evolution Charles Darwin studied live forms for a majority of years and he believed that human life has existed for hundreds of million of years and that creatures have evolved considerably due to natural selection which cause the fittest and most adapted to the environment characteristics are passed on to the offspring. For example giraffes would have been small at first but the ones with the longer next survived best as they were able to get the most and the best leaves and this was then passed on the offspring over generation now making giraffes have longer necks. ...read more.

Conclusion

e.g seventy, or seven hundred million years and they can also argue that evolution existed but it was under the control of God. To conclude I believe that the teleological argument is the strongest argument as there are stronger arguments to support this claim that God created the universe and the main arguments of the evolution theory can be counted and cannot be explained without a God. Like the fact that there was one cell which creatures evolved from Aquinas would have argued there must have been a first causes to cause the creation or existence of the first cell thus being God. Also it can be argued that evolution was under the control of God the whole time undermining the existence of an evolution theory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This is explained by Paley as machines not all being perfect and failing to work sometimes. The fact the world isn't perfect doesn't prove that there isn't a designer. This is a valid point however if you make this assumption that sometimes things go wrong then it would suggest that

  2. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    The archer (God) would aim to some sort of goal (the target). As the target in itself has no mind of its own, God gives the final purpose. The Argument is an ancient argument that stretches from ancient Greek Philosophy with people like Cicero, Plato and Socrates, all the way through history to people like Behe.

  1. Key Features of the Teleological Arguement

    Paley also used an example of the human eye and the way in which this eye is used to see objects. He believed the eye was designed specifically to see and its complex and intricate design just like his watch suggests an intelligent designer behind it.

  2. Writing to argue.

    * Logic and reason win arguments - but be passionate about your views * Interest your audience by using a suitable anecdote to illustrate one of your major points. * Never sound superior, condescending or impolite. Any suggestion that other viewpoints are "silly" or "foolish" is the equivalent of calling your reader "silly" and 'foolish'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work