• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

Extracts from this document...


Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience Religious experience appears to be a unique phenomenon. Despite other reported evidence for the existence of a transcendental reality, without human experience of such a force would such evidence ever have been appealed to? It appears that religious experience can be the basis for faith and a belief in God in a way that other arguments seek merely to validate and support. WILLIAM JAMES certainly thought so, and proposed that these experiences were the catalyst for the development of organised religion. But is such a position valid and compelling? Are religious experiences in themselves an a posteriori proof for the objective reality of the divine and should they be accepted as veridical? Difficulty arises in even defining religious experiences; it seems that there are a huge number of sometimes incompatible accounts. How does one begin to classify or categorise these? RICHARD SWINBURNE considers 5 categories in to which religious experiences fall; two public, and three private. Public experiences are those which are available to all, but on which religious significance can be placed. For example, viewing a beautiful sunset is an experience which all people can enjoy, provided they have full use of their senses and a view of the sky, but the conclusions drawn can be very different. A private experience however is available to one person or a specific group, such as the Virgin Mary's vision of the Angel Gabriel. The implication with this category is that God has chosen to reveal himself specifically to these persons. Although sorting religious experience into categories is useful, as it can help assess relative strengths of different types of experience (for instance an external experience may have more empirical value than an internal one as they are said to have effect on the world outside the mind and may be more widely witnessed), is this an overly simplistic way of viewing such events? ...read more.


In terms of a philosophical analysis this criticism does somewhat undermine the reliability of these experiences, and the fact that the definitions are so ambiguous does undermine the ability to effectively analyse the implications of such an experience. This difficulty in using language to describe and define religious experience is well illustrated by mysticism. During a mystical experience, one feels a complete 'oneness' with the external world (as opposed to the distance that RUDOLPH OTTO felt) and all physical barriers break down. St Teresa, one of the most renowned mystics within the Christian faith described her experiences as the "prayer of quiet" and the "prayer of union." During such prayers she frequently went into a trance, and at times entered upon mystical flights in which she would feel as if her soul were lifted out of her body. She said ecstasy was like a "detachable death" and her soul became awake to God as never before as the faculties and senses are dead. According to WILLIAM JAMES there are four distinguishing features of mystical experiences. The first is "ineffability"7; they cannot be described using language. In the same way that it would be impossible to describe the colour orange to someone who had only ever seen black and white, it is impossible for a mystic experient to meaningfully describe their experience to others. The second is a "noetic quality"8. This relates the way mystical states seem to convey a newfound knowledge of life and the true nature of reality. JAMES also postulates that in general "transiency"9 is common to religious experience, in that they are usually brief, not longer than half an hour. Mystical experiences are usually "passive"10. The mystic feels that (s)he is in the grip of some other power, and cannot control when or how the experience will come, other than putting themselves in the right conditions for being receptive to one. ...read more.


Even adequately describing a religious experience appears virtually impossible, and thus they are difficult to view as reliable evidence. However, clearly for experients they offer irrefutable evidence that something exists beyond the physical, an ultimate reality. But this is a deeply personal thing; as WILLIAM DOUGLAS said: "Religious experiences which are as real as life to some may be incomprehensible to others"15. In some ways this could be regarded as an anti-realist viewpoint, but it illustrates the difficulty in conveying a religious experience to others, and how this affects its worth for philosophers. If religious experience purportedly provides reason and evidence to support the concept of God then realistically the multitude of conflicting and equally unveridical experiences means that it would be a use of flawed reasoning to accept one view of God on this basis. Although DAVIS claims the argument is a cumulative one, one could equally assert that as a result of cumulative weaknesses such as our inability to effectively analyse or accept the reliability of such experiences, the concept fails to have academic and philosophical worth and becomes an article of faith rather than an intellectually valid and verified belief. 1 The Puzzle of God by Peter Vardy, page 115 2 An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion by Brian Davies, page 125 3 An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis by John Hospers, page 240 4 The Existence of God, by Richard Swinburne, page 237 5 Religious Studies, by Sarah K Tyler and Gordon Reid, page 94 6 Twentieth-Century Western Philosophy of Religion 1900-2000, By Eugene Thomas Long, page 148 7 William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, page 537 8 William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, page 537 9 William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, page 538 10 William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, page 538 11 Sigmund Freud, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis 12 The Existence of God, by Richard Swinburne, page 322 (PRINCIPLE OF TESTIMONY) 13 The Existence of God, by Richard Swinburne, page 303 14 Religious Studies, by Sarah K Tyler and Gordon Reid, page 68 15 http://www.teachingaboutreligion.org/TeachingMaterials/snippet_b.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? Ophelia Chatterjee ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Knowledge of God and/or ourselves can be transformed by religious experience Examine and comment ...

    St Paul had no reason to lie about his experience, as he was a persecutor of Christians. St Teresa of Avila was a mystic who argued that RE provided proof for god?s existence. She argues that if an experience fits in with Christian teaching and leaves the individual feeling at peace it is a genuine RE.

  2. Critically assess with reference to William James the arguments from religious experience.

    James claimed that this common core pointed to a single objective source of all religious experiences. In response, many critics claim that it is difficult to even define or interpret what a genuine religious experience is let alone decide if they have a common core.

  1. Discuss the varieties of religious experience

    An example of a mystic is Teresa of Avila who wrote about her experiences, which were mainly visions. Some of which was published. Her most famous vision was of angel with a beautiful face and spear alight with fire, which he thrust into her heart.

  2. Examine and comment on how far the study of religious experience can illuminate an ...

    Also many Christians would argue that an acceptable prayer must be sincere and not selfish, and offered in the faith that God, is, and is the hearer and answerer of prayer, and that he will fulfil his word, ?Ask, and ye shall receive?.

  1. Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    only serves the experience rather than find another way round the explanation. Richard Swinburne, with his ?principle of credulity? and ?principle of testimony? exemplify the previous point I just made. The principle of credulity says that if one cannot find any reason to disbelieve an event, then one shouldn?t really believe in its occurrence.

  2. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    Bernadette was a peasant girl who had no formal education and therefore lacked academic background. Her parents confirmed that she did not know of such word. The church had agreed on this description for Virgin Mary four years earlier but it was not widely discussed or let out into the public.

  1. How Can the Religious View Be Defended As a Way of Seeing the World?

    The skeptic eventually gives up and asks the believer how the claim that there is an ?intangible, odorless, gardener?, differs from the claim that there is ?no? gardener at all. Regardless of any evidence shown to the believer, against the gardener, the believer maintains their belief.

  2. Critically Assess the View that, Without a Predetermined Conceptual Scheme, Our Sense Experience Would ...

    For example Schopenhauer claimed that we only need causation and substance. Similarly, Strawson stated that it is completely possibly for us to imagine a world without some of the Kantian categories such as space. Therefore, if Kant can?t claim that the category of space is a necessary condition of all

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work