• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine and comment on a philosophical approach to the moral and religious issues raised by the practice of abortion.

Extracts from this document...


Examine and comment on a philosophical approach to the moral and religious issues raised by the practice of abortion. Abortion was not legalised in the UK until the 1960's. However, even though it was legal, it was still viewed as socially unacceptable and many women who had abortions were stigmatised. Today, almost 50 years later, many contemporary views have changed, as a fair proportion of society has become more accepting of abortion as a 'necessary evil', however, many still do not accept it and the debate continues. From a moral perspective, the first point to take into consideration is that the foetus, no matter how small, or how young it is, is still a living being, some philosophers, such as Lee Patrick, consider the life of a person to begin the moment conception takes places as it is the first point where it begins to grow and develop, so is the beginning stage on the path to sentient life. It can also be considered wrong as the foetus is guiltless and has no purpose to be aborted, so is taking the life from an innocent. As said by the philosopher Mary Ann Warren. But should this be a punishable act? Other philosophers argue that abortion is morally wrong because it deprives the foetus of a valuable future, on this account, killing an adult human being is wrong because it deprives the victim of a future containing highly valuable or desirable experiences and enjoyments. ...read more.


Or cases where the child will suffer from some mental or physical abnormality that the parents think will very seriously damage its quality of life. But who is to decide that this quality of life is one the fetus cannot adapt to, or even recover from? This can also apply to cases where the pregnancy is entirely unintentional like pregnancy caused by rape, pregnancy caused by failure of contraception where the potential parents are not to blame, and pregnancy caused by an unprofessional vasectomy . Further cases where the pregnancy is unintentional but where a risk was taken such as pregnancy caused by failure of contraception within the known risk that contraceptive method, pregnancy caused by carelessness in the use of contraception, pregnancy caused by failure to use contraception. Also, cases where the pregnancy has lifestyle consequences such as having a child would prevent the mother achieving some life objective, the mother is incapable of looking after the child, there is not enough food to support the child, having another child would result in criminal proceedings against the parent, and coping with the child's disability would damage the family's lifestyle. Situation ethics can be applied to such cases as these. This is a Christian ethical theory, some developed by Joseph Fletcher, which states that sometimes moral principles can be ignored if following the approach to find the most loving outcome, so therefore in the case of abortion depending ...read more.


Therefore, Methodists also do not agree wholly with abortion, however, they do agree with it in certain circumstances (such as, if the pregnancy will affect the life of the mother, if the child will be born handicapped or under social conditions, such as if the birth would severely reduce the living conditions of existing children), most of which are similar to those considered acceptable by the Church of England. Other Churches such as the Anglican Church and the Religious Society of Friends, believe that although abortion should not be encouraged, they feel that under certain circumstances it can be justified. Such as if the pregnancy would threaten the life of the mother, where the mother has been raped, where the foetus is at risk of being seriously handicapped. Overall from a religious point of view, abortion is only considered right under very severe circumstances, or not considered at all. In conclusion, there are very few differences in view on abortion, from a moral and religious perspective, and both points of view consider abortion as an unacceptable action, unless the reason for doing it produces the least pain or is the best moral outcome. However, the religious view of abortion is much more strict than that from a moral perspective as the moral view tend to sympathise with the mother a lot more, whereas the religious outlook is that abortion is still murder, which is going against God, so must be not be taken lightly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    Interestingly, Jordan points out that in Genesis 1:26, God says "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." In which Irenaeus said that when God created us, He firstly made us in his own image but not in his likeness, which is known as an Epistemic Distance, which

  2. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    Nevertheless it is sometimes permissible to do a good act, knowing that bad consequences will result. There are four conditions that must be satisfied before an act is morally permissible in a moral dilemma. (1)The Nature of the Act condition states that the action must be either morally good or indifferent.

  1. Natural law is the most reliable approach when making judgements about sex and relationships. ...

    For example; of sex before marriage being one of these views. For some this idea in which natural law is out of date will mean that for them natural law really isn't the best approach especially when making judgements about sex and relationships.

  2. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    The use of such catch-all phrases as "something akin to", "analogous" and "roughly" may seem inadequate but is perhaps more realistic than attempting to define such ineffable events in concrete terms. This indefinability has led some to assert that religious experience can have no epistemological value.

  1. Examine and comment on the moral and religious issues raised by euthanasia.

    David Hume also agreed that life could be ended if they wished as we have free will. He said "Suicide cannot be a crime against God or the natural law, because God gave us the ability and, sometimes, the desire to commit suicide, it is not wrong to go against

  2. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason

    Everyone has a duty to help suffering people; Kant will also agree with this, however, Kant does not agree that it is possible that such duties are possible without selfishly achieving some happiness themselves. Take for example, an aid worker: if they are asked whether they love their job, they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work