• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine and comment on the view that the principle of the sanctity of life should always be considered of first Importance in medical ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euthanasia Essay Examine and comment on the view that the principle of the sanctity of life should always be considered of first Importance in medical ethics, with reference to the topic you have investigated... Euthanasia is defined as the act of killing someone painlessly especially someone suffering from an incurable terminal disease either at their request. As the law stands in England, Wales and Scotland, deliberate or 'active' euthanasia will normally leave anyone assisting suicide or death liable for murder. Euthanasia has been legalised in a number of European countries, namely The Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. Additionally, the US state of Oregon has a 'Death with Dignity Act' and Australia the Northern Territories ruling. A recent case which caught public attention was that of Anthony Bland. Anthony Bland was a seventeen left severely brain damaged after disaster. Anthony Bland had been in a permanent vegetative state until 1993, when his parents and the NHS from the High Court to withdraw the artificial nutrition and hydration that was keeping him alive. The High Court and the House of Lords agreed. The Roman Catholic Church disagrees with Euthanasia and believes it is as murder. In Evangelium Vitae, Pope John Paul II said that to cause death in this way was 'a grave violation of the law of God'. ...read more.

Middle

This says the temple of God cannot be destroyed. Furthermore (Ecclesiastes 'For everything there is a season...a time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted' This teaches that we as humans do not have the right to decide when to die. From analysing the bible it is clear that generally Christians The absolutism of Natural Law can be considered strength and it has been described as a simple, universal guide for judging the moral value of human behaviour. It states how humans and God share the same rationality, therefore making this philosophy more accessible. However, for those without faith in God it is not necessarily suitable for basing morals and ethical decisions on and it may be seen as too absolutist in solving complicated ethical problems. When applying Aquinas theories to the debate on euthanasia, it would appear that because it does not promote life and Gods power over this life, it is not compatible. By taking away a life that God has no chosen to do, we are playing God and this is wrong according to Aquinas. Peter Singer dismisses the idea of sanctity of life and suggests that our attitudes are changing. ...read more.

Conclusion

I think here Rachels wants society should decide whether euthanasia is permissible in regards to which death would be brought upon the individual, which of course would be the most humane. Rachels furthers bringing up the case where a patients suffering can not be relieved by care. He suggest the idea that active euthanasia in this specific case should be used rather than passive euthanasia because it would free the patient of their suffering more quickly. Problems and issues will be raised if Euthanasia is legalised as it could lead to a slippery slope and the facility may be abused. Terminally ill may feel pressured to die to relief their 'burden' on their families and also then there is the problem of the interpretation of a person quality of life. Where will it stop at? Anybody with imperfections could be deemed to have a low quality of life death, handicapped, blind or elderly. We never be able to fully measure quality of life for this reason I believe sanctity of life is of greater importance because it sets the rules straight and there can be no misinterpretations which arise with QOL. The different Christian denominations have their own views and opinion on the subject of euthanasia but the Roman Catholic is absolute stating that life itself is valuable and sacred and if any person can be kept alive without futile treatment they should. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. In this essay I will be looking at Ethics and the importance of using ...

    With this dilemma we will encounter emotional issues and as counsellors we have an ethical responsibility to take this issue to supervision for support and advice. We also need to consider our own morals and ethics. "It is not unethical to feel attraction to a client.

  2. 'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

    That's primary'. We have autonomy over our bodies in matters of life, and it should be the same in matters of death. Thus, voluntary euthanasia gives people full autonomy and should be legalised. Other believers of voluntary euthanasia claim that it maintains quality of life.

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    They would also argue that life is God given and only God can take it away. In Job 1: 20-21 it says, "The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away". This signifies God as the only one who can take lives, not doctors.

  2. Explain what you think is the strongest objection to this argument. Next, explain what ...

    For example, there is a great probability that a fertile couple using contraception for two years prevented a human life. Both Noonan and Marquis agree that abortion is wrong but contraception is not the same as killing, but they based their arguments on different points: Noonan's position is based on a biological point of view.

  1. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    It can also be seen being active. It can be put across in a positive way in a form of prayer or a compliment, i.e., Jesus persuaded his disciples to 'pray' for the enemies. Another framework of Christian ethics is natural law. This maintains that human reason reflecting on human nature can arrive at moral wisdom and knowledge.

  2. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    This might be challenged by an appeal, for example to an exemption in the case of thought, which is sometimes held to work on non-deterministic quantum processes, although it's not clear whether quantum processes are simply-non computable yet deterministic. In ethics there are three philosophical approaches to freedom.

  1. Business Ethics

    Higgs and Kapelianis (1999) concurred and suggested that the need to satisfy multiple interest groups do indeed create ethical conflicts amongst accountants. This may be due to the fact that it is difficult to reconcile and therefore satisfy the differing needs and interests of all parties involved.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    theory, which proposes that an actions ability to be morally good depends on whether it is commanded by God. Due to the deontological (certain rules that we must follow depending on the theory) nature of Divine Command, it is understood that it focuses with items of absolute, intrinsic and universal values.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work