• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine different ways in which ‘good’ is used in Meta Ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine different ways in which 'good' is used in Meta Ethics. In the modern degrading society we live in today, people are constantly questioning the highly debatable topic of morals. We would like to think that we are trying our hardest to strive to do what is right in society to make us decent people. However it is hard to do what is 'good' when there are so many different ways of defining the meaning of good itself. There are three main types of ethics, Descriptive, Prescriptive and Meta ethics. Descriptive ethics presents the facts in the way people live and how they make moral choices in life. It simply states the facts without making any moral judgement of 'good' or 'bad'. Prescriptive ethics states the norm about what is right or wrong by examining the choices and the reasons behind the issues. It says how we should live or behave setting standards for everyone to live by. This is the most widely used form of ethical language when debating morality. Meta ethics is a philosophical analysis of different words used in ethical language. It closely examines the words themselves and their exact meaning in different contexts. The subject of Meta ethics is to intimately study the moral language to be able to reach a better understanding of its meaning. ...read more.

Middle

Relative terms are the direct opposite of absolute terms. When something is relative, it totally depends on the specific situation it is in. It is also dependent on people's personal opinions. Everyone views situations in their own way, which is slightly different to everyone else. It all relies on what you believe it to be in your own individual opinion. The term 'good' therefore can only be determined in its particular context. This is also known as Subjectiveness, for example euthanasia or fighting for a cause you believe in are two examples of relative situations of doing a 'good' thing. There are several theories' we can look at in which the term 'good' is used in Meta ethics. The first of these is the utilitarian theory of good. According to this theory, a term is determined as being good pending the results of a specific moral act. For example, if we were in the situation where we had to kill one person to save the lives of thousands of others then this would be seen as 'good'. This is because although the sacrifice of one life is not 'good' in itself alone, because it saves the lives of many more it is seen as the greater 'good' because it is the lesser of two evils. ...read more.

Conclusion

The phrase 'good' will have a certain meaning not only for different situations but also for different people. Many people can observe an act but they may disagree as to whether the act was good or not depending on their conscience and opinion. Intuitionism means it has a distinct meaning for you. G E Moore gave the example of the colour yellow, we cannot define a colour, we may be able to give examples of things that are yellow but to give an actual definition of yellow is quite impossible. He believed that we should judge the goodness of an action based on its results, aiming to maximise 'good' in the world. He was a strong intuitionist, which involved the belief that within us we have a "moral faculty" which reveals "moral truth" to us, showing us what was morally 'good'. Another focal area of Meta ethics, which involves language, is Emotivism or ethical non-Cognitivism. Emotivism is sometimes viewed as merely the expression of feelings of the speaker. They can be seen more as commands or rules the speakers wants its audience to follow. These feelings are the opinions of the speaker saying what they believe to be right or wrong and are dependent on a matter of taste. The term 'good' is accordingly defined depending on what the speaker believes to be right. They state a moral preference of what they do or do not approve of and not the core meaning itself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    F. Coppleston and R. Walker say that the categorical imperative is 'rather imprecise' they argue that Kant does not specify the rules we humans are meant to universalise. However, supporters of Kant are quick to state that the categorical imperative is necessarily devoid of content and should not recommend a specific maxim.

  2. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    to get the weapon off an axe murderer then it is ok to do so. I feel as though this is a complete cop out. In effect he is coming up with a set of rules that have to be universalised and they are based on reason, and then comes

  1. What is meant by Meta Ethics? Meta ethics helps to establish what constitutes ...

    Problems in emotivism are that it does not make a connection between moral judgements and reasons. Emotivists see moral judgements like commands and are a way of trying to influence other people's views about things yet they should be accepted because they play a great part in ethics only when weighing up the two sides.

  2. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    Examine and discuss the reasons for arguing that morality should not be linked to religion (15 mks). Ans. Not everyone of course agrees that morality and religion are, or should be, linked. Humanists for example, unlike Christians, reject the idea that our moral sense comes from God.

  1. Explain and discuss the four major theories of meta-ethics; Naturalism, Emotivism, Intuitionism and Prescriptivism.

    Rachels rejects emotivism as he believes moral judgements require reasons or else they are arbitrary. Others would say that emotivism does not have many followers, as it is simply a discussion of opinions, whether it's a discussion or a shouting match of views.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    The Hippocratic oath that a doctor takes because they are there to save lives, "I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect". One could argue that to stay true to their pledge, they must not accept euthanasia and be very much against its legalisation.

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    However, whether one can universalise a maxim or not under the categorical imperative has more to do with how you state your maxim, rather than with the maxim itself. For example, if I said, 'Tiffani can kill anyone she wants so long as she is sure she will get away with it.'

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    These people may believe relativism gives them a convincing reason to be good: they are good because they do what they believe to be the right thing, and this means that they never do the wrong thing. Another reason why relativism provides us with a reason to be good is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work