• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - to what extent is one of these a more convincing argument for life after death than the other?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐AO1) Examine the concepts of the immortality of the soul with the resurrection of the body. AO2) To what extent is one of these a more convincing argument for life after death than the other? AO1: Since the beginning of time, philosophers have debated whether a post-mortem existence is possible. The eschatological question not only terrifies us, but astonishes us also. Religion to many provides the comforting idea that this short, seemingly irrelevant existence has meaning when being put towards an afterlife. Different religions teach different forms of life after death within their institutions, but how can we evaluate which one is more plausible? Resurrection is a central doctrine within Christianity, it is also very important amongst other monotheistic religions such as Islam and Judaism. This monistic approach sees that God, as an act of love, will bring back to eternal life those who have died. ?He who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live?.(John 11:25) The person who has died is not ?resuscitated? for this would be a contradiction as life and death are two wholly separate states. The person is no longer the same as the one who has died after resurrection, instead they are given by God a ?spiritual form? also known as the ?soma pneumatikon? which is the continuity of memories and characteristics. ...read more.

Middle

Things that change must eventually decay, it is the soul which stays the same. It would therefore be impossible to assume that soul is made from body and body is made from soul. Cogito Ergo Sum or ?I think, therefore I am? is a quote from French philosopher Rene Descartes who is sceptical of the physical world and suggests that to doubt the physical existence of a person is proof of the reality of one?s mind. It would imply that one is not robotic but can think for oneself and proposes that we are free willed. Descartes argues that the soul is the most meaningful way of understanding the afterlife. This notion of life after death would support the perception of the soul being the most meaningful and important reality for it focuses entirely on the soul as opposed to the physical body. Immanuel Kant believed that the purpose of human existence was to achieve complete good or ?summum bonum?. Life is far too short to reach this and so God is morally obligated to grant us eternity. Morality would otherwise be pointless. Immortality of the soul grants the idea of multiple life times in which we can gain this potential. ...read more.

Conclusion

If there are no challenges to overcome, what is the point in existing in an afterlife? How can one be sure that it is truly worthwhile? H.H Price also points out that if we do not have a physical body, how can we interact with other souls? Perhaps we continue to exist but not consciously. There are two men walking down a road, one believes that the road will take them to a city, the other believes there to be nothing. If they do not walk, it cannot be proven right or wrong, they have to reach the end of the road to know the truth and so to argue is meaningless. In conclusion, both the idea of judgement day and death itself cannot be verified until the end of life is reached, and so religion is meaningless. Neither form of life after death provides empirical evidence to support the notion. Immortality of the soul does however seem more plausible than the idea of a body coming back to life as we often hear of people recalling past lives. The only evidence of Resurrection is found in the Bible which is outdated and focuses on the resurrection of Jesus. Immortality of the soul is therefore a more convincing argument for life after death than Resurrection of the body. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    to put a body back together, make it work, and then say that life after death is a reality. I believe this goes against the concept of 'resurrection'. By 'resurrection' we mean that a body comes to life after having experienced death.

  2. Body soul destinction

    The mind according to Descartes is non - spatial and is distinct from material and bodily substances. He suggested that everything has characteristics and that the mind and body's characteristics are different therefore hey must be separate. For example a property of the mind may be consciousness, whereas the body has more aesthetic qualities such as height breadth etc.

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Plato spoke out against them. He believed that truth, not worldly success, was the proper aim of philosophy. Plato's point is that we can never have true knowledge of anything that is in a constant state of change. We can only have opinions about things that belong to the world of the senses, tangible things.

  2. Compare and contrast the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body. ...

    The Jews also believe that the resurrection of the dead will occur in the messianic age, when this happens the righteous will be brought back to life and the wicked dead will not be resurrected. The idea of the immortality of the soul, this is the belief that the soul

  1. Why does the mind and body problem still exist?

    Someone who challenges epiphenomenalism is David Chalmers. Another theory is known as Materialism which is that everything is either made only of matter or is ultimately dependant upon matter for its existence and nature. One of the first materialists to emerge was Aristotle, later on Thomas Hobbes and Pierre Gassendi represent the materialists tradition in opposition to Rene Descartes.

  2. Examine the key concepts associated with two of the following: Immortality of the ...

    When one life ends, the next life continues on from the stage reached by the previous life. While rebirth is often identified with reincarnation, reincarnation depends upon belief in an unchanging self, or atman, which Buddhists, disagree with. Within Buddhism there is a variety of different understandings of rebirth, all views emphasise the process of constant change.

  1. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    It resulted to people speaking of the mind and body as different phenomena as if the soul was something identifiably extra within a person intrinsically wrong. He used the example of someone watching a cricket game and asking where the team spirit was.

  2. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    "I am confident that there truly is such a thing as living again, that the living spring from the dead, and that the souls of the dead are in existence." - Socrates There are ways in which people may argue that there is life after death and evidence for life after death including near death experiences.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work