• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

Extracts from this document...


Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality Homosexuality is a subject, which is forever being raised in today's media and society. It is constantly brought to the attention of many to be somewhat reassessed in terms of ethical and religious view points, whether through the newspapers or the television. While religious view points used to manipulate society in all matters, it now seems to be the media which influences and guides social attitudes towards homosexuality. For many years, it has been seen as intrinsically wrong to everybody, religious and secular. However, it is fast becoming more and more accepted by a larger number of people. Just the mention of homosexuality in a Roman Catholic Church is bound to be frowned upon or combated with a quick fire of biblical references to show you that homosexuality is wrong in the eyes of God. Catholicism has often been blamed for the development of homophobia, particularly in the West. While this may seem a little unfair, it is most certainly true that homophobia is ubiquitous within this Christian denomination. Many Catholics often refer to what few references there are in the Bible to the subject of homosexuality. For example, the story of the town called Sodom (Gen. 19-21) is one of the most famous indications that people often refer to. Here, a man named Lot is greeted by two of God's divine messengers, who wish to warn Lot that God is displeased with the terrible behavior. He then receives men at his door saying that they wish to commit sexual acts with these divine messengers and in response to this, God burns the town to the ground. ...read more.


Disagreeing with this documentation would be opposing what the modern day Catholicism is requiring them to do and therefore many Catholics see it as intrinsically wrong to be homosexual, no matter what the reasons or circumstances. As well as actual textual references that say homosexuality is wrong, there are many other arguments that are always put forward by Catholics. Perhaps the most famous was that developed by Thomas Aquinas, called The Natural Law. This is the idea that sex is only for pro-creation, that is having children. He argues that this is why God gave us the sexual organs and using them for anything other than reproduction would be to misuse our bodies. Of course, this includes any form of homosexual activity and many Christians stick to this rule explicitly. This means, however, that some Christians find it perfectly acceptable to be homosexual but remain celibate throughout their entire lifetime. There are several Christian denominations that do find forms of homosexuality acceptable. Quakers say that homosexuality is "no more deplorable than left-handedness and that it is the nature and quality of the relationship that matters". This means that as long as the relationship is a loving and caring relationship then it is perfectly acceptable no matter who is involved. This view is shared by the Methodist denomination of Christianity, which states that "For homosexual men and women, permanent relationships characterized by love can be an appropriate and Christian way of expressing their sexuality." Many Christians believe that the most important teaching of Jesus was that you must love each other and treat each other how you would like to be treated. ...read more.


Many people call it unnatural and against what man was made to do, so to speak. Natural would be to preserve the human race and of course, homosexual relationship do not do this. Charles Darwin proposed the idea of "Naturalistic Hume's Law" which said that just because things are natural does not mean they are good and just because things are artificial or unnatural does not mean they are evil or bad. If we put this into modern day perspective we can see that, while homosexuality may be considered unnatural (which it may or may not be depending on one's opinion), it does not mean it is necessarily wrong. This seems to suggest that the question of whether homosexuality is natural or unnatural is irrelevant because that factor doesn't contribute to whether it is right or wrong, moral or immoral. In conclusion, it seems that there will probably always be an issue with homosexuality and religious groups until religious leaders are willing to see alternative interpretations of their sacred texts. However, it does seem that many people are beginning to accept homosexuality into society without the consideration of religion. The media has heavily influenced the acceptance of homosexuality as well as the legalizing of it in 1967. In a few years' times, homophobia should be almost non-existent, excluding the religious groups who aren't willing to change their views with the modern day times. We could argue forever which view is more right in terms or morals and religious aspects but in the end it depends entirely upon personal opinion and we cannot force people to be okay with something as controversial as this. Homophobia should be something, which will diminish given time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Hick's views on body and soul

    It would appear that an exact replica is not the same as the original person for there has to be some sort of continuity between the original person and the person of the afterlife. Hicks argues that the replica would indeed have the same psychological make up of the original, but does this then make the person the same individual?

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    However, since clones are the exact replicas of someone already alive, their genetic dispositions will have already surfaced. Kass' response is these three contexts are that they are all too passive. They ignore the value of the process of bringing forth new life and look at the question in terms of results and rights.

  1. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    The Western culture has progressively legalised private homosexual acts between consenting adults. In the United Kingdom, the Sexual Offences Act 1967 decriminalised private sexual acts between men 21 years and over in England and Wales. In these same countries, consent to buggery and certain other homosexual acts was then reduced to 16, in the year 2001.

  2. Ethical Theories are of no help when discussing matters of sex and relationships

    but as in the whole so also in the parts, our study should be that every part of man and every act of his may attain its due end" SUMMA CONTRA GENTILES BOOK 3, Chapter 122 Aquinas maintains that sex, or rather the 'emission of the semen' has two key roles to play; I)

  1. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    Francis Bacon held that ' The inclination to goodness is deeply imprinted in the nature of man' - in contrast to the Christian teaching that as a result of the Fall of Adam - the human heart is sinful and in a state of rebellion against the Creator.

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    (Ethics and the Christian, Chapter 4, Conscience Guilt and Sin, by Gabriel Daly, p.63) We therefore have the right to self-determination in our moral outlook on life and conscience is a vital component in that freedom. The Roman Catholic Church teaches that conscience is vitally important in human life and

  1. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    Although medically there is no justification for this reasoning, this idea informed the modern abortion laws. Therefore, using Aquinas?s concept comes a point when aborting a foetus is not ethically sound. There is no biological evidence that ensoulment takes place at different times for different genders.

  2. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    Guilty people do not all of a sudden become innocent because they escaped it or innocent people don?t deserve punishment because others suffer it. Justice and equality are not hand in hand and though equality should be important and practiced it should not affect the hand of justice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work