• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality Homosexuality is a subject, which is forever being raised in today's media and society. It is constantly brought to the attention of many to be somewhat reassessed in terms of ethical and religious view points, whether through the newspapers or the television. While religious view points used to manipulate society in all matters, it now seems to be the media which influences and guides social attitudes towards homosexuality. For many years, it has been seen as intrinsically wrong to everybody, religious and secular. However, it is fast becoming more and more accepted by a larger number of people. Just the mention of homosexuality in a Roman Catholic Church is bound to be frowned upon or combated with a quick fire of biblical references to show you that homosexuality is wrong in the eyes of God. Catholicism has often been blamed for the development of homophobia, particularly in the West. While this may seem a little unfair, it is most certainly true that homophobia is ubiquitous within this Christian denomination. Many Catholics often refer to what few references there are in the Bible to the subject of homosexuality. For example, the story of the town called Sodom (Gen. 19-21) is one of the most famous indications that people often refer to. Here, a man named Lot is greeted by two of God's divine messengers, who wish to warn Lot that God is displeased with the terrible behavior. He then receives men at his door saying that they wish to commit sexual acts with these divine messengers and in response to this, God burns the town to the ground. ...read more.

Middle

Disagreeing with this documentation would be opposing what the modern day Catholicism is requiring them to do and therefore many Catholics see it as intrinsically wrong to be homosexual, no matter what the reasons or circumstances. As well as actual textual references that say homosexuality is wrong, there are many other arguments that are always put forward by Catholics. Perhaps the most famous was that developed by Thomas Aquinas, called The Natural Law. This is the idea that sex is only for pro-creation, that is having children. He argues that this is why God gave us the sexual organs and using them for anything other than reproduction would be to misuse our bodies. Of course, this includes any form of homosexual activity and many Christians stick to this rule explicitly. This means, however, that some Christians find it perfectly acceptable to be homosexual but remain celibate throughout their entire lifetime. There are several Christian denominations that do find forms of homosexuality acceptable. Quakers say that homosexuality is "no more deplorable than left-handedness and that it is the nature and quality of the relationship that matters". This means that as long as the relationship is a loving and caring relationship then it is perfectly acceptable no matter who is involved. This view is shared by the Methodist denomination of Christianity, which states that "For homosexual men and women, permanent relationships characterized by love can be an appropriate and Christian way of expressing their sexuality." Many Christians believe that the most important teaching of Jesus was that you must love each other and treat each other how you would like to be treated. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people call it unnatural and against what man was made to do, so to speak. Natural would be to preserve the human race and of course, homosexual relationship do not do this. Charles Darwin proposed the idea of "Naturalistic Hume's Law" which said that just because things are natural does not mean they are good and just because things are artificial or unnatural does not mean they are evil or bad. If we put this into modern day perspective we can see that, while homosexuality may be considered unnatural (which it may or may not be depending on one's opinion), it does not mean it is necessarily wrong. This seems to suggest that the question of whether homosexuality is natural or unnatural is irrelevant because that factor doesn't contribute to whether it is right or wrong, moral or immoral. In conclusion, it seems that there will probably always be an issue with homosexuality and religious groups until religious leaders are willing to see alternative interpretations of their sacred texts. However, it does seem that many people are beginning to accept homosexuality into society without the consideration of religion. The media has heavily influenced the acceptance of homosexuality as well as the legalizing of it in 1967. In a few years' times, homophobia should be almost non-existent, excluding the religious groups who aren't willing to change their views with the modern day times. We could argue forever which view is more right in terms or morals and religious aspects but in the end it depends entirely upon personal opinion and we cannot force people to be okay with something as controversial as this. Homophobia should be something, which will diminish given time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    and damnation', frightening people to conform out of fear and not allowing them the liberty to strive for inner conviction.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    Unfortunately religion is too often devoid of reason; that, though, is more often the fault of those who follow the religion than with the religion itself. The answer to the death penalty does not lie in finding out what "God" wants but, rather, in determining what is right.

  1. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    By simply examining photographic evidence, and the written accounts of soldiers and survivours we surely have proof that the Holocaust was wrong. Similarly, reducing moral statements to mere matters of personal opinion we can ignore certain evidence. For example, the statement "caring for your child is right" is a moral statement which can be scientifically tested.

  2. Outline the general ethical responsibilities on helping relationships and discuss them with examples from ...

    In counselling organisations, the British Association of Counsellors (BAC) has the responsibility to ensure that counsellors abide by and practice the codes of ethics. Within medicine, this responsibility lies with the General Medical Council (GMC) and social workers have the British Association of Social Workers (BASW).

  1. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    It is only reasonable that the distinction be made. Executing a murderer can be seen as a crime preventive if the execution prevents the murderer from killing again. It can also be seen as a crime deterrent if the execution serves as an example and results in frightening off others from committing murder.

  2. With reference to both religious and ethical views, explain the arguments for human surrogacy. ...

    The family has historically been a place with a right to privacy and beyond the intervention of governments. To some extent this has changed with the introduction of artificial forms of reproduction e.g. IVF treatment. If a couple deeply desires children, it should not be the government?s role to tell them what they can and cannot do.

  1. Explain Christian views on suicide.

    In The City of God he wrote, ?certainly he who kills himself is a homicide, and so much guiltier of his own death, as he was more innocent of that offence for which he doomed himself to die.? To take one?s own life into one?s hands and act precipitously by

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    Biologically nothing, but in terms of the law it makes all the difference because it passes the cut off day. Methods that might determine fetal viability did not have the precision that the law usually requires until the twentieth century, such as birth, missed period and the quickening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work