• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

Extracts from this document...


Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality Homosexuality is a subject, which is forever being raised in today's media and society. It is constantly brought to the attention of many to be somewhat reassessed in terms of ethical and religious view points, whether through the newspapers or the television. While religious view points used to manipulate society in all matters, it now seems to be the media which influences and guides social attitudes towards homosexuality. For many years, it has been seen as intrinsically wrong to everybody, religious and secular. However, it is fast becoming more and more accepted by a larger number of people. Just the mention of homosexuality in a Roman Catholic Church is bound to be frowned upon or combated with a quick fire of biblical references to show you that homosexuality is wrong in the eyes of God. Catholicism has often been blamed for the development of homophobia, particularly in the West. While this may seem a little unfair, it is most certainly true that homophobia is ubiquitous within this Christian denomination. Many Catholics often refer to what few references there are in the Bible to the subject of homosexuality. For example, the story of the town called Sodom (Gen. 19-21) is one of the most famous indications that people often refer to. Here, a man named Lot is greeted by two of God's divine messengers, who wish to warn Lot that God is displeased with the terrible behavior. He then receives men at his door saying that they wish to commit sexual acts with these divine messengers and in response to this, God burns the town to the ground. ...read more.


Disagreeing with this documentation would be opposing what the modern day Catholicism is requiring them to do and therefore many Catholics see it as intrinsically wrong to be homosexual, no matter what the reasons or circumstances. As well as actual textual references that say homosexuality is wrong, there are many other arguments that are always put forward by Catholics. Perhaps the most famous was that developed by Thomas Aquinas, called The Natural Law. This is the idea that sex is only for pro-creation, that is having children. He argues that this is why God gave us the sexual organs and using them for anything other than reproduction would be to misuse our bodies. Of course, this includes any form of homosexual activity and many Christians stick to this rule explicitly. This means, however, that some Christians find it perfectly acceptable to be homosexual but remain celibate throughout their entire lifetime. There are several Christian denominations that do find forms of homosexuality acceptable. Quakers say that homosexuality is "no more deplorable than left-handedness and that it is the nature and quality of the relationship that matters". This means that as long as the relationship is a loving and caring relationship then it is perfectly acceptable no matter who is involved. This view is shared by the Methodist denomination of Christianity, which states that "For homosexual men and women, permanent relationships characterized by love can be an appropriate and Christian way of expressing their sexuality." Many Christians believe that the most important teaching of Jesus was that you must love each other and treat each other how you would like to be treated. ...read more.


Many people call it unnatural and against what man was made to do, so to speak. Natural would be to preserve the human race and of course, homosexual relationship do not do this. Charles Darwin proposed the idea of "Naturalistic Hume's Law" which said that just because things are natural does not mean they are good and just because things are artificial or unnatural does not mean they are evil or bad. If we put this into modern day perspective we can see that, while homosexuality may be considered unnatural (which it may or may not be depending on one's opinion), it does not mean it is necessarily wrong. This seems to suggest that the question of whether homosexuality is natural or unnatural is irrelevant because that factor doesn't contribute to whether it is right or wrong, moral or immoral. In conclusion, it seems that there will probably always be an issue with homosexuality and religious groups until religious leaders are willing to see alternative interpretations of their sacred texts. However, it does seem that many people are beginning to accept homosexuality into society without the consideration of religion. The media has heavily influenced the acceptance of homosexuality as well as the legalizing of it in 1967. In a few years' times, homophobia should be almost non-existent, excluding the religious groups who aren't willing to change their views with the modern day times. We could argue forever which view is more right in terms or morals and religious aspects but in the end it depends entirely upon personal opinion and we cannot force people to be okay with something as controversial as this. Homophobia should be something, which will diminish given time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    and damnation', frightening people to conform out of fear and not allowing them the liberty to strive for inner conviction.

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    evil, and this may cast real doubt upon the absolute sovereign nature of conscience. Even if an individuals conscience is healthy and mature there might still be certain circumstances where the best thing to do would be to ignore conscience.

  1. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    For example, to say "murdering innocent people is wrong" is not just a matter of personal preference. Surely, there must be a way to prove that this is fact. We know that the mass murder of millions of innocent Jews during the second world war was wrong, and feel that we are totally justified in our conviction.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    However, since clones are the exact replicas of someone already alive, their genetic dispositions will have already surfaced. Kass' response is these three contexts are that they are all too passive. They ignore the value of the process of bringing forth new life and look at the question in terms of results and rights.

  1. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    Unfortunately religion is too often devoid of reason; that, though, is more often the fault of those who follow the religion than with the religion itself. The answer to the death penalty does not lie in finding out what "God" wants but, rather, in determining what is right.

  2. Hick's views on body and soul

    It would appear that an exact replica is not the same as the original person for there has to be some sort of continuity between the original person and the person of the afterlife. Hicks argues that the replica would indeed have the same psychological make up of the original, but does this then make the person the same individual?

  1. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    However, Bedau presents this argument in a cost benefit analysis. Haag states that the execution of innocent people is a miscarriage of justice and that its advantages of possibly saving future innocent victims because of the execution of the murderer outweigh the drawbacks of executing an innocent person.

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    Vitalism takes the view that nothing justifies the termination of human life because we are made in the image of God. ?God is the author or life. He starts it and he should end it.? (John 1:21) However, weak sanctity of life argues that agape should be the primary determining principle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work