• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Examine the different ways in which 'good' is used in meta-ethics."

Extracts from this document...


Meta-ethics June 2001- a) "Examine the different ways in which 'good' is used in meta-ethics." Meta-ethics is the study of the meaning of moral language. It describes presuppositions and language of morality. There are a number of different ethical theories for the meaning of good used in meta-ethics. The four main headings under which most acceptable theories can fit under in some shape or form. These are Ethical Naturalism (or Definism), Intuitionism, Emotivism and Presciptivism. Definism theory states that all ethical statements are similar to non-ethical statements and can, therefore, be approached in the same way. In the same way that we can verify a scientific fact, ethical naturalism theory states that we can verify an ethical statement. They are both prepositional. Definism states that ethical statements are just a type of short hand for more complex propositions. So therefore, in terms of Ethical Naturalism, if I were to use the term 'good' in a number of examples, it would just be a 'summary' word to sum up all the other words I wish to have incorporated into my sentence. ...read more.


A similar theory to Intuitionism is Emotivism. An Emotivist believes that moral judgements simply express our feelings on a subject. If someone were to claim something was 'good', an Emotivist would see this as an emotional exclamation, not a truth claim, and would take it to mean that the person approves of the thing/action/person etc. Another fairly similar theory is Prescriptivism. Prescriptivists believe that in using moral language such as 'good/bad' or 'right/wrong,' we are simply prescribing our opinions. In other words were are saying, 'do this, and let everyone do the same in the same situation.' Therefore, if someone were to say 'giving to charity is good,' what he or she is really saying is 'you ought to give to charity.' This again, means that 'good' not used as a universal truth, but in this case it is used as a universal prescription. In summary: in Definism, the term 'good' is simply a 'short hand' for more complex propositions that apply to that particular example. In Intuitionism holds that good in indefinable and therefore has no universal meaning. ...read more.


The first would be to question the number of people included in the generalization of the word 'people.' If the sentence is intended to mean, "if anybody approves of something, it must be socially approved", then the statement is not true. However, we can also take the sentence to mean, "If the majority of people within a society approve of something, then it is said to be socially approved." If we swap 'good' back into the sentence we end up with a statement that looks like this: " if the majority of people within a society approve of something then it is good." Thus we have formed the central principle of Cultural relativism. In terms of the other theories that define 'good', only one can be applied. Definism would argue that the statement is simply a short hand for more complex propositions. So in this case, 'good' is used to mean 'beneficial' or 'correct.' Since this is possibly true, Ethical naturalists would have a fairly strong argument here. Emotivism, Intuitionism or Prescriptivism cannot really apply here as they are all subjective and based on opinion and in this case good cannot be used an exclamation of opinion. ?? ?? ?? ?? Charlie Matthews 12CAS 28/04/2007 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain and discuss the four major theories of meta-ethics; Naturalism, Emotivism, Intuitionism and Prescriptivism.

    More recent theories such as chaos theory are challenging naturalism, this means that to secure ethics/naturalism to science saying that morals can be proven leaves it vulnerable to new scientific discoveries, and the basic fact that sometimes science can be wrong, I which case it leaves may people wondering if science can be proven wrong, can morals be wrong?

  2. In this essay I will be looking at Ethics and the importance of using ...

    Conclusion I feel that we simply have two choices with this dilemma. We either go ahead with the counselling or we don't. If we felt that it was inappropriate for us to counsel the client then we could refer them to another counsellor then there isn't a dilemma.

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    This would seem to promote euthanasia, however, Kant only permits will to be good if it entails acting from respect of moral law. Thou shall not murder is a moral law. Therefore, a Kantian approach being deontological (duty based) would never permit euthanasia.

  2. Business Ethics

    The charge claimed that if the auditor had done their work professionally, they would have detected the fraudulent dividend payment illegally made to fictitious shareholders. Similar cases were reported in Italy and Malaysia. In the former, two auditors from the 'big five" were charged in court for failing to detect

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    It too is addictive. Do its lower cost and its freedom from the narcotics pusher tip the balance? We lack what might be called a mathematics of mercy, but until we find one we are flying blind. Another issue crystallizing lately is latent in the phrase "quality of life."

  2. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    John has become the victim of appalling prejudice and abuse...the news will hurt thousands of Christian people who are not gay but believe strongly in God's love and redemption for all his children equally'. In the middle of this great division, the Archbishop of Canterbury stated 'This has been a

  1. Religious and/or moral principles are a hindrance with medical ethics. Examine and comment on ...

    This is to present the idea of foetuses which need to stay attached and inside a pregnant woman; hindering all their capabilities. The analogy goes onto observe the idea of which life bears most importance; is it the famous violinist, who cannot do anything?

  2. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    But there is a problem when discussing viability. We are biological entities and develop at different rates; therefore each foetus gains viability at a different time. Furthermore, twenty-four weeks is not precise enough. What is the difference between twenty-four weeks six days and six hours?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work