• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine what is meant by situation ethics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Situation Ethics Examine what is meant by situation ethics (14) "Christianity has traditionally been dominated by natural law thinking and Situation Ethics arose out of this background" (The Puzzle of Ethics, by Peter Vardy and Paul Grosch, page 123). In the 1966 an Anglican theologian, Joseph Fletcher published a book called "Situation Ethics" in which he rejected previous deontological ethical systems. It would be wrong to believe that Fletcher founded the idea of Situation Ethics because, as I have already stated, Situation ethics has its foundations in the natural law thinking of the Christian Church. Fletcher claimed there were three possible approaches to ethics. There was the deontological approach where you have a set of rules that may never be broken, no matter what the circumstances. Fletcher believed this inflexible approach created a poor ethical system because it put the law first and made the law the most important thing. The Ten Commandments is a good example of this. Take "thou shalt not steal", is it right to steal a gun from a man who intends to use it to murder his wife? If you believe that the law is intrinsically good and should be put first then you would not steal the gun. ...read more.

Middle

The second is Positivism, reasoning within religious faith. People have to be able to see for themselves why love is paramount and the most important consideration. Situation Ethics is dependent upon people being about to see that love is the most important factor. Personalism is the fourth presumption that people should be put first. Deontological ethical systems put the law first; in these systems the law is the most important factor. With Situation Ethics people are the most important and are put before any other consideration. Supporters of Situation Ethics love people not laws. To take the example of the man with a gun who intends to shoot his wife. The most loving action would be to steal the gun for love of the wife because he intends to kill her, the person is put first. If we were simply following the Ten Commandments then the law would be put first, it would be wrong to steal the gun and so we must allow the man to shoot his wife. As well as the four presumptions that Fletcher highlighted in his book "Situation Ethics", there are the six basic principles. These follow on from and extend the presumptions. The first principle is "Only love is intrinsically good; nothing else", with Situation Ethics the only criteria for something being good is that it brings about love; if something does this then it is good and there are no other factors to take into consideration. ...read more.

Conclusion

The sixth and final principle is that, "Love's decisions are made situationally, not prescriptively.". In Situation Ethics there is no way of knowing whether something is right or wrong because the circumstances of each situation are unique. Moral decisions are only possible when applied to a particular example, generalisation and absolute decisions are not permitted. However, for this to work we have to rely on the assumption that people are able to make decisions themselves. Dostoevsky's Grand Inquisitor believed that people could not cope with the freedom given to them and wanted to impose laws instead. For Situation Ethics to work the Grand Inquisitor must be wrong and humans must be able to make decisions for themselves. To conclude, Fletcher, although not the original pioneer of the basic principles of Situation Ethics is the authority we look to simply because it was he who developed these basic ideas and published his book "Situation Ethics" in 1966. The foundation of Situation Ethics is the 'Law of Love', the agape form of love is the most important thing and comes before any other consideration. Also, absolute rules are not permitted because Situation Ethics recognises that each situation is unique and should be treated as such. The only absolute statement that cannot be contradicted within this ethical system is that love is the most important thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Kant's theory seems to suffer most from the attack that someone with warped and unconventional values could will all kinds of universal laws without inconsistency. A masochist could will the torture of everybody as long as he did not mind being tortured himself.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    "This is called the slippery slope argument. In general form it says that if we allow something relatively harmless today, we may start a trend that results in something currently

  1. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    This will naturally project all things moral. Having identified the three main functions that Aquinas establishes within natural law it would be of importance to go on to identify other key aspects. Firstly I would be inclined to recognize what Aquinas referred to as 'apparent goods'. Apparent good is a term given to an action, which on

  2. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    However, there are some complications in enforcing it. The law affects and is affected by social forces and prevailing ethical standards. Although the law can codify societies ethical values, ethical decision making transcends the law in that: 1.) The law deals with actions not with thoughts, and therefore it does not (and cannot)

  1. Religious Ethics are not the best approach to environmental ethics'. Discuss.

    Aquinas's Natural Law theory is based on the thinking of Aristotle, that all things in nature are for the good of man. He extends this further to explain how things are not worthless, but valuable because they are what God intended them to be; they fulfil their own Telos.

  2. The Ethics of Stealing

    People who support this belief would say stealing is wrong because each person has a right to keep their own property and we have a duty to respect that right. Like other deontological beliefs, the message is that if the action is wrong, do not do it.

  1. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    Forcing a woman to remain pregnant by denying her an abortion is like forcing her to donate all her bodily organs to sustaining another life. Do we have the right to force someone to have a transplant to save another life?

  2. Explain what is meant by a Natural Law approach to ethics

    This was a way that Aristotle could differentiate humans from other living creatures; we have the ability to live a life of reason where as other creatures do not. As we are the only creature able to Aristotle believed that it was our purpose, or we would not have evolved with the ability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work