• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and assess Nietzsche's critique of past philosophers.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain and assess Nietzsche's critique of past philosophers The desire of most philosophers, Nietzsche says, is to find truth. Nietzsche doesn't see why this is. In the second aphorism, he asks why don't we look for untruth? He believes that beliefs are more important than finding truth because, for him, there is no real truth. Philosophers state a truth or known fact as if it were the ultimate knowledge, but Nietzsche says that really they are giving their opinions about things. Philosophers don't have knowledge - just beliefs. He says that philosophers' prejudices about the world influence the things they say and what they think they know and so we shouldn't pay too much attention to the actual things they're saying. ...read more.

Middle

Too much emphasis has been made of truth. However, there must be some truths in the world, even if it is very basic without our perceptions. For example, if I see a can on a table, I know that there is one object on top of another object, even if it is only my perception telling me what the objects are? Plato is a philosopher that Nietzsche heavily disagrees with. Plato said that this life isn't the real one and that when we die, we will go on to a real world that is better than this one. Nietzsche says this is not true. There is not another world or life apart from the one we are living in. ...read more.

Conclusion

He criticises Schaupenhauer for not wanting to say yes to life. But if Nietzsche knows that there is no truth or outside world then he must be sure of this. Therefore, he knows something. Nietzsche disagrees with Descartes because Descartes believes that we can know one thing for certain - I think therefore I am, and from this we can prove that other things are certain, such as God and the rest of the world. Nietzsche says that this isn't the case and that we cannot know that there is such an 'I' - it is not an immediate certainty. There might not be individual thoughts thinking this, but one big collective thought. But how can I not know I exist when I am thinking? Every individual person has his or her own thoughts which mean that they must exist, otherwise how could they, collectively or individually, be thinking? Tisha Dyer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    danger: whereas a society populated with free thinking individuals is a mature and successful society. Specifically referring to social tyranny, Mill states that "though society is not founded on a contract, everyone who receives the protection of society owes a return for the benefit" - meaning, if you conform to society, or public opinion, you will receive protection, i.e.

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    Would this lack of emotion make for a good authority? Many would say that you cannot be emotional about your leadership because then your judgement would be swayed by too many subjective factors. However, the thought of a leader without emotion is particularly daunting - how would they know what would affect the population, and more importantly how?

  1. What is the Truth

    The reason that they would have given false witness is that they did not finish telling the lawyer that after they saw this person stabbed forty nine times that he got up and bowed because it was all part of some street corner magician's act.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    There had to be something greater than us to create humans. Meaning that we are lesser than the creator thus our values and morals can not be taken seriously. Even if you believe in evolution there had to be a first mover to start the chain of evolutionary development.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work