• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and illustrate the four different viewpoints on the state of nature of Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau and the Anarchists.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain and illustrate the four different viewpoints on the state of nature. The four main viewpoints on the state of nature are proposed by; Hobbes, Locke Rousseau and Anarchists. Hobbes outlines the state of nature in Leviathan. It is very likely that Hobbes view on the state of nature is influenced by the civil war that engulfed England from its start in 1642. Hobbes first outlines as human beings in a constant search for felicity, a continual success in achieving objects of desire. Hobbes believed that the fundamental principal behind the search for felicity was the desire for power. This desire for power becomes problematic, as humans will be competing against each other for said power. Hobbes states that the search of felicity is ?a restlesse desire of power after power, that ceaseth onely in death?. This creates a state of war as Hobbes holds an assumption that all human being are by nature ?equal?; by this he means each individual has an equal ability to kill another individual. ...read more.


Locke proposed a fundamentally different state, a state of perfect freedom and equality which is bound by a Law of Nature. Hobbes principle of equality is concerned with the mental and physical capabilities of all people, no one naturally has a right to rule. Locke?s Law of Nature states that no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions. This Law has a theological aspect as Locke believed that while we have no natural superiors, we do have a superior in heaven. Essentially this law outlines that mankind is to be preserved as much as possible. Harm can only be caused for the purpose of self-defence. Locke?s natural liberty is to do no more than what the Law of Nature outlines. Locke recognizes that humans would not be automatically motivated to follow the Law of Nature and that an enforcer would be needed to ensure the function of the law. ...read more.


Humans have two special attributes; free will, and the capacity for self-improvement. Unlike Hobbes, Rousseau believed that the human desire for self-improvement would not lead to immanent warfare as Hobbe?s believed, but would to innovation. This would result in the idea of co-operation being employed, individuals have mutual interests and would benefit out of co-operating to achieve goals. The anarchist view of the state of nature outlines that humans, when perfected could become not only non-aggressive but highly co-operative. Humans profit from natural ?mutual aid?. If the state of war is damaging for all, rational, self-interested creatures will eventually learn to co-operate. The state would be peaceful and plentiful as a result of teamwork. Anarchists argue that government is not the remedy to anti-social behavior, but is it?s cause. This state of nature supposing humans will be co-operative and help each other, appears to sound utopian. However it is argued that social pressure in the anarchist state of nature and other forms of social action will result in discipline. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. What are Mill’s four main arguments in defence of freedom of speech?

    the 'ancients' and themselves, and that all differences between them was to the benefit of the modern age. Mill explains that Rousseau's work forced society to re-examine its position and add elements of his work to their 'world view'. That is not to say that Rousseau was any more right

  2. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    For example, older couples, same sex couples, people with criminal tendencies and (in extreme cases) paedophiles. Older couples may not be able to ensure their presence to care for a child for as long as it needs it. Some would object to same sex couples having children on the grounds

  1. Outline and Illustrate Aristotle(TM)s account of voluntary action and responsibility

    For example, a lawyer who argues for a poor man in order to gain a good reputation is not acting from virtue; he is acting in line with virtue. Aristotle's argument in basic terms is as follows: a watch has a function and its goodness resides in that function; if

  2. John Locke and the Right to Property

    In keeping with the theory of one's body is one's own, a man's property can be explained in terms of the different aspects of his labor. Physical labor, exertion of his mind, or work of his hands to produce products for this person's labor, is then his own property (Section 27).

  1. Discuss critically the differing notions of power and freedom explored in the 'Gorgias'.

    Plato's argument here is not as convincing since he redefines "want" continually throughout this section. He appears to restrict wanting to cases where it is actual and not just apparent. Some commentators argue that Plato is deepening our understanding of want and not just changing his definition to suit his

  2. Reductive physicalist accounts of the mind fail to fully explain the nature of mental ...

    What is a belief then? To say TNT is explosive is not to say it is actually exploding. Rather that only if it were to be detonated it would explode. Thus, for something to have a disposition, simply an ?if then? statement needs to be true.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work