• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Anselm and Descartes ontological argument

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain Anselm and Descartes ontological argument (25 marks) The ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of God, using an a priori method where no empirical evidence is required. The argument begins with an explanation of God and that is not a contingent being God is necessary and exists without a creator. The ontological argument uses logic and the concept that is absurd to say that God does not exist as its main argument; to say that god does not exist is illogical as you have already accepted the idea of God, as stated in the bible Psalm 14:1 ?the fool says in his heart God does not exist.? Anselm (1033-1109) put the ontological argument forward in his book ?Proslogion.?Anselm starts the argument with a definition of God, stating God is ?that than which nothing greater can be conceived? this is stating that if God is the greatest being that can be thought of therefore God must exist. ...read more.


This part of Anselm?s argument is stating that God is a necessary being and that everything that is contingent relies on this eternal being. Moreover another supporter of the ontological argument is Descartes. Descartes states that God is a supremely perfect being, that God is flawless. Descartes stated that existence is perfection therefore God must have existence. Moreover this can be use in the example of a valley without a mountain both are necessary in order for a valley to exist, similarly it is existence is a necessary part of God, it is Gods predicate. To conclude Descartes is saying that imaging God without the predicate of existence is illogical such as a triangle without three sides Emmanuel Kant criticises Descartes version of the ontological argument. ...read more.


another philosopher argues against the ontological argument as he stated that the just because we have said something is real, does not mean it is actually real. He stated that there is a possible world e.g. David Cameron was prime minister however it is possible he was a street cleaner there are infinite possibilities. Platinga stated that maximal greatness is God and if God is maximally great he would exist in all of the possible worlds. To conclude Anselms and Descartes ontological argument is based on a definition of God and enables any reader of the argument to understand the importance of the existence of God and that, it is difficult to think of a superior being to God. Some could argue that the ontological argument is unsuccessful improving Gods existence as many philosophers have critised the argument; however I believe the argument is effective in making someone think philosophically about the world and how a creator is a necessary being. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    way that God must exist, it merely states that if God is to exist, he must possess existence. It is true that we can conceive of a God as existing, within our understanding, but not admit to that God existing in reality; simply attributing existence as a necessary component of

  2. Does the ontological argument work?

    So Kant used his own form of philosophical language to develop his own counter argument to knock down Anselm's. It is therefore impossible for the Ontological argument to work in Kant's point of view because he used a realist theory and by correspondence you cant say that God is necessary

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    * Humans have a propensity to sensationalise, which prompts us to uncritically perpetuate miracle stories. Hume claims that humans have a passion of surprise and wonder and this agreeable emotion makes them believe the reports of miracles. This is a tendency of the mind that is exactly opposite to the principle of habit.

  2. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    He argues against this by saying that the word 'is' can be used in two different ways:- to define something and to state the existence of something. The first usage says nothing about existence but explains what a word or concept means.

  1. Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

    Whatever you believe therefore, there will always be something, however sceptical you set out to be, that you know. Some have claimed that this makes global scepticism an impossibility. On his part, Descartes does justify his use of logic later in the Meditations.

  2. Explain the ontological argument from Anselm and Descartes.

    In effect, what Anselm is saying is that "God exists" is an analytic statement and we can show that the statement is true merely by analysing what it means to be God. This is called the first form of the ontological argument.

  1. Explain Descartes' Ontological Argument

    Even at this stage, Descartes? ontological argument is open to other challenges. Philosopher Gassendi asks whether Descartes is right to say that existence is part of the idea of God as the supremely perfect being. Surely we can still think of a God who does not exist.

  2. Explain Anselms ontological argument.

    Hence god does exist both in reality and in the understanding; therefore we can also conclude that the fool in reality is actually a fool. (The fool is denying the existence of the greatest possible being, this being must exist for it to be the greatest possible being, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work