• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God. Humes criticisms alone completely discredit the cosmological argument Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain Aquinas' cosmological argument for the existence of God The Cosmological Argument has several forms, but is fundamentally a proof for the existence of the God of classical theism. It seeks to respond to the human need for answers to questions like "who created the universe?". The word 'cosmos' refers to the universe as an ordered, harmonious and holistic entity. Aquinas stated that nothing comes from nothing; the universe exists, so something must have made it - that can only be God. Thomas Aquinas developed this argument which the ancient Greeks also used for the existence of God. He began in the natural world of the senses and reasoned from it, making this an a posteriori argument. The final work of Aquinas was his Summa Theologiae which summed up his idea of theology demonstrating the existence of God known as the Five Ways of which three are cosmological; they are the First Cause Argument, the Prime Mover Argument and the Argument from Contingency. Aquinas's argument started with the first way: motion. Aquinas believed that everything in existence is in motion or has the potential to change, for example, humans develop, grow old and die. In Aquinas' way of thinking, you cannot be both potentially and actually the same thing at the same time, for example it makes no sense to talk of ...read more.

Middle

There was a time before certain things existed, and there will be a time when they no longer exist. There must also have been a time when nothing existed. For Aquinas, the only thing which has always existed is God (who would therefore have necessary existence). Furthermore, Aquinas saw no way to explain how anything was here, unless something was already in existence prior to it. Thus if God did not exist, nothing else would exist. Aquinas concluded that this necessary being, which all contingent beings came from, is God. In conclusion it is evident that Aquinas' cosmological argument seeks to argue for the existence of God based on what we experience of the world and universe we live in. The central aim of the argument is to establish what caused everything to be here and how the world and the universe began. Hume's criticisms alone completely discredit the cosmological argument - Discuss This statement represents the view of those such as Kant, Russell and of course Hume himself who are against the cosmological argument because of various faults in the theory. I disagree with the statement as I believe the cosmological argument is a logical way of establishing how the world and universe began - there must have been something that is outside space and time, non-contingent and needed no cause of its own and this in my opinion was the superior power of God. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hume's next criticism is one of the lack of empiral evidence as there is no direct experience of the creation of the universe. Hume maintains that the Cosmological argument begins with familiar concepts of the universe and concludes with not-so-familiar concepts beyond human experience. For Hume, God's existence cannot be proven analytically since the definition of God's nature is not knowable. Hume concludes that it is not possible to prove the existence of a being who is unknowable and different from all other beings. When considering this I see Hume's point however there is no evidence of any experience of the creation of the universe therefore the idea of proof in this aspect of philosophy is, I believe, irrelevant. In conclusion, given the controversy and debates that surround the cosmological argument, including Hume's critiques, it is certainly apparent that the theory is not without its faults. That having being said, I do not believe that the criticisms of Hume completely discredit the argument as there is no proof of anything to do with the creation of the universe therefore every viewpoint can be reasoned with. Even today the cosmological argument remains appealing and credible and after balancing all opinions, although it is slightly contradictory when saying everything needs a cause except God, it stays a strong argument that Hume's critiques have not completely discredited. ?? ?? ?? ?? Georgia Nicoll ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God.

    that the universe has a fixed amount of energy which can be converted to different forms, but never created or destroyed. Thus if these theories are accepted, the statement 'things can either exist or not exist' is only partially correct.

  2. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    The stories these people reported were usually circulated and exaggerated, altering them significantly as is the case with urban myths, such as that after Hurricane Katrina stating that law and order had broken down. Hume also considered the general level of education of the country as a whole to be important.

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    untrue; if something can pop into existence and pop out of existence, then it cannot also pop back into existence again.20 Thus, according to Hume, all things may be contingent, without any need for necessary existence. 21 Here the arguments are ordered so we can examine specific premises.

  2. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    This first argument is very similar to the next argument which Aquinas called the uncaused cause, or the first cause argument. In the world we find an order of efficient causes. There is no case where a thing is found to be its own efficient cause; it would have to exist before itself, which is impossible.

  1. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    If the latter is not taught by the Church then it is ignorance yes, but not necessarily invincible. Despite these apparent issues with this form of ethical conduct, the Roman Catholic Magisterium has rejected Augustine's view in favour of Aquinas'.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    There are several weaknesses to the Cosmological Argument, suggested by different philosophers. Hume was the first to find a weakness in the argument. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, he asked why must we conclude that the universe has a beginning: "How can anything that exists from eternity have a cause,

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    wrote this to reinforce faith and belief to readers he assumed to be similar to him in some ways, and so would accept the God of classical theism as the cause, and by taking his argument out of context is rather unfair and unreasonable to Al-Ghazali.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    Plato believed this mover must be a soul, intelligent, must not be physical, and must be a higher order of the human soul. Aristotle took this further in his book Metaphysics, believing that the prime mover could not be part of the ordinary chain of physical and material causes, and so must lie outside the universe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work