• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how a follower of natural law might approach the issues surrounding Abortion.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how a follower of natural law might approach the issues surrounding Abortion. Natural Law, as outlined and enforced by Thomas Aquinas, says that every living thing has a purpose, and that every solution to a dilemma and every action can be solved by reasoning, which will gain you ultimate happiness. This Is linked with Aristotle's idea that everyone has a specific purpose, and the Primary Precepts can help you to achieve your purpose. This is key knowledge to help with the understanding of Natural Law follower's views about abortion. Human reasoning in any dilemma or problematic situation should be applied to the Primary Precepts of Natural Law. The two main precepts that are concerned in Natural Law with abortion are The Preservation of Life and Reproduction. Generally, conforming to Natural Law, the right action to take would be one that conforms to all the precepts, however with abortion it is not quite as simple. ...read more.

Middle

However this is only if one believes that life begins at conception. Abortion involves taking the life of a foetus that you believe to be a human life, which in turn act against the precept of the Preservation of Life, as you not preserving life, but taking one away. However, there are a few exceptions. Aquinas' Doctrine of Double effect applies these exceptions. Aquinas saw the precepts as absolutely true for every single being, and that using our reasoning can bring us to the right solution in every situation. However there are times when in order to conform to one precept, we must decide to act against another. For example; there is a pregnant woman, however for medical reasons carrying on with the pregnancy would end in her death. She has two choices, one; have the baby and end her own life or two; have an abortion and save her own life. ...read more.

Conclusion

These criteria are suggested by Mary Anne Warren, and are Sentience, Emotionality, Reason, Ability to Communicate, Self-awareness and Moral agency. Conforming to these criteria would mean the a Foetus cannot be classed as a person, as it does not fit into any of these criteria. However, later on in the development of a Foetus it begins to fit into some of the criteria, such as Sentience. Could this mean that a foetus slowly becomes a person? Mary Anne Warren suggests that a Foetus is a potential person, but says that it does not have a right to life, which really does not solve any arguments as to whether or not a Foetus is a person. It is also argued that a potential life, as proposed by Mary Anne Warren, does not have any rights or privileges. This would also mean that a Foetus does not have access to human rights, and the right to life. So that begs the question, if something does not have access to human rights, is it a person? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. To what extent would a follower of Natural Law allow euthanasia?

    This is because the Doctrine does not allow a bad act even if it results in a good consequence. People may argue that to assist someone in killing themselves is a bad act that results in the good consequence of that person being relieved of their pain and this would therefore be wrong according to the Doctrine.

  2. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    point of view on whether you could do so, and how much it would be worth; many would argue that a kidney is priceless, so one cannot pay someone for it. It is very hard to equivocate the benefits of receiving a kidney to receiving money for the donation of

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    business that they need to be taught the skills necessary for ferreting out the truth and evaluating the dynamics of business that might, and often do, lead to fraud. Business and professional schools across the country are making noises about "getting serious" about ethics, but what will this mean in practice?

  2. is abortion justified to save the mother's life

    firstly she has a poor mental health and is incapable of caring for herself let alone another being. And secondly if the woman has been forced to conceive the baby she is carrying, against her will, ie. Rape. I believe that in these circumstances the majority of people would agree

  1. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    For instance he postulates that that the main function of genital organs are for procreation and therefore denounces homosexuality, masturbation or even the enjoyment of sex! However, in observation bodily organs generally have many a function. Mouths are not just for eating but also for kissing, talking...they are limitless.

  2. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    This makes it much easier to consider the issue of euthanasia from the viewpoint of someone who wants euthanasia. Death is regarded as a bad thing: * because human life is intrinsically valuable * because life and death are God's business with which we shouldn't interfere * because most people

  1. Evaluate a Utilitarian approach to Abortion.

    Mill believed that there is a distinction between 'higher' and 'lower' pleasures. He accepted the idea of a woman giving birth because the outcome of that would be a child so it would be a higher pleasure for the parents and as a consequence the child would cause much pleasure

  2. Explore the moral issues surrounding the right to a child.

    Other fertility treatments such as AID, the process where a donor sperm is injected into a woman or AIH, which is where the husband?s sperm is injected into the wife. Paul Ramsay, a protestant opposes the idea of AID, as he believes that reproduction should only be within marriage, as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work