• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action. Jeremy Bentham, father and founder of Utilitarianism, first proposed his theory, now known as and hereby referred to as Act Utilitarianism, as the basis for a complete social reform. Whilst Bentham may have failed in this aspect, he did lay the foundations for future ethicists such as J.S. Mill, P. Singer and H. Sidgwick to expand and explore his theory of Utilitarianism further. Bentham's original theory of Utilitarianism can be boiled down to one underlying principle; the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Bentham proposed that an action's moral worth can be determined by the use of the Hedonic Calculus. This formula takes into account the intensity, duration and number of people affected (amongst other factors) and places a numerical value on the outcome. This may seem like a rather clinical and mathematic way to try and measure what it ultimately an abstract concept such as pleasure or happiness, and subsequently critics have said Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to justify horrific acts such as torture, gang rape or murder. ...read more.

Middle

To apply Bentham's theory to the letter, what we would do is utilise the Hedonic Calculus. We would decide on the intensity, duration, certainty, remoteness, fecundity and extent of each course of action and then choose the course which should, in theory, give the greatest happiness to the greatest number. On matters such as this, Act Utilitarianism and the Hedonic Calculus do seem to be the best course of action to follow, but perhaps on more serious matters the case may not be the same. Immediately we go into darker territory when giving an example of when Act Utilitarianism would not be the best course of action to follow, as it is only really on more sinister issues that Bentham's theory falls down. Consider gang rape. Applying Bentham's 'greatest happiness for the greatest number' principle and the Hedonic Calculus would lead us to the conclusion that if Act Utilitarianism was used to decide whether or not gang rape was morally justifiable, it would be. ...read more.

Conclusion

can be called simple or basic pleasures, for example the pizza topping, as the ultimate consequence of following the Hedonic Calculus is never, or at least is rarely, sufficient enough to constitute not doing so. On the other hand, when we consider actions such as gang rape or torture, the Hedonic Calculus would generally have us encourage the action, although it can be argued that this is taking Act Utilitarianism out of context, and that any ethical theory only works when applied as a whole. To conclude, Jeremy Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action when it is applied to issues which do not generally have dire or particularly painful consequences. It may also be equally applicable when applying Bentham's entire theory of justice, though the supposed action in theory can never be certified to be the same as the resultant action in reality, so we can never be sure as to whether or not Act Utilitarianism in its entirety would always be used to decide the best course of action. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

This essay includes the basic points about Bentham's classical act utilitarianism. For this sort of "explain" question, not much further detail is required and so the evaluation of Bentham's theory is not required. Instead, more information about the hedonic calculus would be good.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    The hedonic calculus causes problems as if we were to apply duration of pleasure or pain it would be impossible as we all react to pain/pleasure differently. For example, if five rapists were to rape the same woman, then using the hedonic calculus, their pleasure would overweigh the woman's pain.

  2. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    He stated that the real world was a non-material world that was outside time and space. It was known only through reason - which ultimately results in pure, permanent knowledge. There is no change eternally, so the world, and everything in it, is perfect.

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    According to act utilitarians, when determining whether the act is right, it is the value or the quality of the consequences of the particular act that count. I may break any law, if in that situation, greater happiness will result.

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    Plato gives many examples in understanding the Forms, examples of 'cats' and the mathematics way of 'circles'. He believes the form of a circle exists but not in the physical world of space and time. It exists as a changeless object in the world of forms or Ideas, which can be known only by reason.

  1. Compare and contrast the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body. ...

    Therefore, there must be some immortal soul which enters the body at birth and then the soul leaves at death. Plato's ideas on dualism were developed in Phaedo whereby he developed four arguments for the immortality of the soul. Firstly cyclical, this means everything comes into existence from its opposite and it sets up a cycle for birth and death.

  2. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    However Freud then put the ?Id? in the space above this which represents the part of a human that is amoral (has no morality). The Id contains our wishes and instincts. Then at the top of the triangle was the ?Ego? which is the conscious part of a human that shows on the outside.

  1. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    The theory developed by the logical positivists is known as the verification principle. It states that we know the meaning of a statement if we know the conditions under which the statement is either true or false. If it isn?t possible to know how to prove the statement true or

  2. Since utilitarians hold that justice can be subordinated to overall utility, utilitarianism is morally ...

    That is, a utilitarian would not see the attainment of the greatest happiness as morally unacceptable in any circumstances, as his moral code states that the greatest happiness should be attained in any circumstances.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work