• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action. Jeremy Bentham, father and founder of Utilitarianism, first proposed his theory, now known as and hereby referred to as Act Utilitarianism, as the basis for a complete social reform. Whilst Bentham may have failed in this aspect, he did lay the foundations for future ethicists such as J.S. Mill, P. Singer and H. Sidgwick to expand and explore his theory of Utilitarianism further. Bentham's original theory of Utilitarianism can be boiled down to one underlying principle; the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Bentham proposed that an action's moral worth can be determined by the use of the Hedonic Calculus. This formula takes into account the intensity, duration and number of people affected (amongst other factors) and places a numerical value on the outcome. This may seem like a rather clinical and mathematic way to try and measure what it ultimately an abstract concept such as pleasure or happiness, and subsequently critics have said Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to justify horrific acts such as torture, gang rape or murder. ...read more.

Middle

To apply Bentham's theory to the letter, what we would do is utilise the Hedonic Calculus. We would decide on the intensity, duration, certainty, remoteness, fecundity and extent of each course of action and then choose the course which should, in theory, give the greatest happiness to the greatest number. On matters such as this, Act Utilitarianism and the Hedonic Calculus do seem to be the best course of action to follow, but perhaps on more serious matters the case may not be the same. Immediately we go into darker territory when giving an example of when Act Utilitarianism would not be the best course of action to follow, as it is only really on more sinister issues that Bentham's theory falls down. Consider gang rape. Applying Bentham's 'greatest happiness for the greatest number' principle and the Hedonic Calculus would lead us to the conclusion that if Act Utilitarianism was used to decide whether or not gang rape was morally justifiable, it would be. ...read more.

Conclusion

can be called simple or basic pleasures, for example the pizza topping, as the ultimate consequence of following the Hedonic Calculus is never, or at least is rarely, sufficient enough to constitute not doing so. On the other hand, when we consider actions such as gang rape or torture, the Hedonic Calculus would generally have us encourage the action, although it can be argued that this is taking Act Utilitarianism out of context, and that any ethical theory only works when applied as a whole. To conclude, Jeremy Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action when it is applied to issues which do not generally have dire or particularly painful consequences. It may also be equally applicable when applying Bentham's entire theory of justice, though the supposed action in theory can never be certified to be the same as the resultant action in reality, so we can never be sure as to whether or not Act Utilitarianism in its entirety would always be used to decide the best course of action. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

This essay includes the basic points about Bentham's classical act utilitarianism. For this sort of "explain" question, not much further detail is required and so the evaluation of Bentham's theory is not required. Instead, more information about the hedonic calculus would be good.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    He stated that the real world was a non-material world that was outside time and space. It was known only through reason - which ultimately results in pure, permanent knowledge. There is no change eternally, so the world, and everything in it, is perfect.

  2. Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

    of their actions would produce the maximum amount of pleasure for the greatest amount of people, and the least amount of pain. However Mill did not agree with this he said justice is the main thing and argued that selfless organizations do not use the hedonic calculus because they do

  1. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    Plato believed there is basically an 'Ideal' everything. He claimed that in the Ideal world there is an Ideal 'cat' created by God. The cats we see in our daily life are inferior instances of the Ideal cat. The cats in our lives are constantly changing but the Ideal cat is eternal, depending on nothing for its existence and is the object of knowledge, not opinion.

  2. To what extent is god's omnipotence a logically coherant concept

    Yes, there's a contradiction in this, but so what? God can, on this understanding of omnipotence, make contradictions true. Thomas Aquinas had a narrower conception of omnipotence. According to Aquinas, God is able to do anything possible; he can part the red sea, and he can restore the dead to

  1. A priori, A posteriori, which is better?

    Also arguments based on definition also assume that everyone agrees on the definition, an argument say across languages would then be difficult on definition but if it was based on experience it would be universally accepted. A posteriori arguments also allow for various conclusions, the problem with this is that

  2. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    When faces with a moral choice, I must decide what action will lead to the greatest good in this particular situation. When faced with a moral choice, I must decide what action will lead to the greatest good in this particular situation.

  1. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    However Freud then put the ?Id? in the space above this which represents the part of a human that is amoral (has no morality). The Id contains our wishes and instincts. Then at the top of the triangle was the ?Ego? which is the conscious part of a human that shows on the outside.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    It has been said that the use of language in this way anthropomorphises or objectifies God. Using words in this way appears to somewhat limit God?s power e.g. in the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo?s depiction of God. The logical positivists developed from the work of philosophers known as the Vienna Circle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work