• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action. Jeremy Bentham, father and founder of Utilitarianism, first proposed his theory, now known as and hereby referred to as Act Utilitarianism, as the basis for a complete social reform. Whilst Bentham may have failed in this aspect, he did lay the foundations for future ethicists such as J.S. Mill, P. Singer and H. Sidgwick to expand and explore his theory of Utilitarianism further. Bentham's original theory of Utilitarianism can be boiled down to one underlying principle; the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Bentham proposed that an action's moral worth can be determined by the use of the Hedonic Calculus. This formula takes into account the intensity, duration and number of people affected (amongst other factors) and places a numerical value on the outcome. This may seem like a rather clinical and mathematic way to try and measure what it ultimately an abstract concept such as pleasure or happiness, and subsequently critics have said Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to justify horrific acts such as torture, gang rape or murder. ...read more.

Middle

To apply Bentham's theory to the letter, what we would do is utilise the Hedonic Calculus. We would decide on the intensity, duration, certainty, remoteness, fecundity and extent of each course of action and then choose the course which should, in theory, give the greatest happiness to the greatest number. On matters such as this, Act Utilitarianism and the Hedonic Calculus do seem to be the best course of action to follow, but perhaps on more serious matters the case may not be the same. Immediately we go into darker territory when giving an example of when Act Utilitarianism would not be the best course of action to follow, as it is only really on more sinister issues that Bentham's theory falls down. Consider gang rape. Applying Bentham's 'greatest happiness for the greatest number' principle and the Hedonic Calculus would lead us to the conclusion that if Act Utilitarianism was used to decide whether or not gang rape was morally justifiable, it would be. ...read more.

Conclusion

can be called simple or basic pleasures, for example the pizza topping, as the ultimate consequence of following the Hedonic Calculus is never, or at least is rarely, sufficient enough to constitute not doing so. On the other hand, when we consider actions such as gang rape or torture, the Hedonic Calculus would generally have us encourage the action, although it can be argued that this is taking Act Utilitarianism out of context, and that any ethical theory only works when applied as a whole. To conclude, Jeremy Bentham's version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course of action when it is applied to issues which do not generally have dire or particularly painful consequences. It may also be equally applicable when applying Bentham's entire theory of justice, though the supposed action in theory can never be certified to be the same as the resultant action in reality, so we can never be sure as to whether or not Act Utilitarianism in its entirety would always be used to decide the best course of action. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

This essay includes the basic points about Bentham's classical act utilitarianism. For this sort of "explain" question, not much further detail is required and so the evaluation of Bentham's theory is not required. Instead, more information about the hedonic calculus would be good.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    It is able to take the 'least bad' in difficult situations so when there is a tough decision the one with the most love in the outcome would always be chosen which is usually the good one. "It gives a person freedom"4 meaning that it is flexible in the way

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    Also, Bentham only appeared to measure happiness in a quantity system. Mill progressed from the quantity pleasures to quality pleasures. For the example, I will use the likes of the flower seller in Covent Garden. The flower seller enjoys her weekly bottle of gin, but according to Mills principle they

  1. Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

    not think about themselves, they are concerned with everyone having the greatest good. Jeremy Bentham's theory aims to produce the greatest amount of pleasure for the majority, however Mills theory distinguishes between 2 types of pleasures which are high pleasures and low pleasures, higher pleasure are those of the mind

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    As Aquinas argued that to ensure that we existed in an ordered society, rules must be constructed for humans to follow, the action of cloning would be seen as immoral as it may cause a divide in society, as their are conflicts as to whether it is right or wrong as it is murder, but can benefit infertile couples.

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms

    We are referring to a particular essence or quality that it shares with animals that are also described as 'dog'; they all share something of the Form of the Cat. Plato went further than this and also claimed that in the world of Forms, there is an ideal dog, created by God.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    Mill claims that "society as a whole can issue wrong mandates and practice a tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression." He argues therefore that protection against political tyranny is not enough: there also needs to be protection from social tyranny or "the tyranny of prevailing opinion" the latter being harder to achieve protection from.

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    This eternal world is more real than the world we experience through the senses (or Empirical knowledge - knowledge based on our senses), and it is the object of knowledge, pure knowledge, not opinion. Before Plato came up with this theory, philosophers before him, namely Heraclitus, viewed the world of as a subject of constant change.

  2. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    However Freud then put the ?Id? in the space above this which represents the part of a human that is amoral (has no morality). The Id contains our wishes and instincts. Then at the top of the triangle was the ?Ego? which is the conscious part of a human that shows on the outside.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work