• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism may be used to decide the right cause of action and the strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


Explain Bentham's version of Utilitarianism may be used to decide the right cause of action. By Beatrice Meecham Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that shows the reasons for a person choosing to carry out an action - it justifies an action being for the greater good. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which means it looks at the consequences or result of an action - to decide whether it is subsequently right or wrong this also makes it a consequentialist theory. The theory of Utilitarianism began with Jeremy Bentham. Bentham's theory of Utilitarianism is where actions are judged based upon the pleasure gained in the result. Jeremy Bentham was the man who originally thought of and came up with the idea of Utilitarianism, he believed in 'the greatest good for the greatest number'. There are two types of Utilitarianism; Bentham's theory is Act Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is about creating the greatest amount of pleasure in a particular situation through a particular action. Bentham believed and used research to conclude that people would naturally seek pleasure and avoid pain. 'Nature had placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do as well as to determine what we shall do.' ...read more.


When faced in a dilemma, Bentham believed that you could chose the 'good' option - the option which would do the most amount of good and the least amount of pain. For example, if you are in a plane crash and you could only save one person; your wife, your child or a doctor who has the ability to save many. Bentham believes in this situation you must use 'the hedonic calculus' to form a solution to your problem. The doctor could make thousands of lives better and create much more pleasure than if you save the wife or child, however this tough decision would leave you without pleasure. Following Bentham's utilitarianism you must save the doctor. When a decision has to be made over a moral situation, the hedonic calculus is used. In using the hedonic calculus the individuals involved should be considered by applying the seven factors to them in relation to the options for the choice of action you have. 'Utilitarianism has no serious weakness' Discuss It is true that Utilitarianism does have many strengths however it does have weaknesses too. Bentham, Mill, Hare and Singer's theories each have their own faults. Utilitarianism is very straight forward and easy to understand. It is very natural for a person to consider the outcome and how much pleasure they will gain before going through with an action. ...read more.


to his favourite park he used to visit but on the way to handing over the money you see an advert that says it needs �30,000 to save 10,000 people. Out of duty you must give the money to the park however if you are following Utilitarianism your belief is that the money must going into creating the most good/ happiness which would be saving those 10,000 people. W.D Ross believed it was important for you to follow and carry out your duty. Bentham's Act utilitarianism although was flexible and relied on the consequences it had no defence for minorities for example; one slave being treated badly but creating happiness for a whole family would be thought of as right. Also it is very impractical having to calculate using the 'hedonic calculus' every decision we make. There is also a difficulty defining what pleasure is for example; a paedophile's pleasure is very different to another person's. Mill's Rule utilitarianism is very practical and sets about certain rules for society that must be maintained which can help societies to operate. However there are weaknesses to rule utilitarianism too again there is no defence for minorities or any help at what defines happiness but also this time if you are following rules you could end up obeying them even when more happiness can be created by disobeying them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course ...

    3 star(s)

    This is applying what we call the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number' principle. If ham was ordered, then three out of four people would feel the unhappiness or pain that would only otherwise be felt by one person, and so the collective pain is tripled if ham is ordered.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    Mill distinguished that there were two forms of pleasure, higher pleasures and lower pleasures. He wrote "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig dissatisfied, better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied" The mind will be stimulated from the higher pleasures and the body will be stimulated from the lower pleasure.

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    Act utilitarianism has the benefit of flexibility, being able to take into account individual situations at a given moment, although the actions that it justifies can change. The form of utilitarianism is more closely associated with Jeremy Bentham, who is focused on further on.

  2. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    it infringes the right of equality: "everybody to count for one, and nobody to count for more than one."4 However, this suggests that Mill is basing a decision here on equality, and not on utilitarian ideas. Indeed, does it not seem that a principle which is based upon aggregation can never be equated with one of equality.

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    According to the doctrine, it is always wrong to intentionally do a bad act to bring about good consequences. So the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would not be justified, as the supposed good of ending the war early was brought about by the death of tens of thousands.

  2. Critically discuss utilitarianism

    dialysis machines, heart donors etc. The patient with the highest number of worthwhile years left with the treatment would expect the treatment but there is a problem in this concept about whether the patient's consequences should be considered or also the effect on families involved.

  1. UTILITARIANISM In this paper I will be discussing utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the theory ...

    sensation will be followed by another sensation of the opposite kind, extent: the # of persons affected by the act. Bentham's utility principle is saying that the sadistic voyeur should open the curtain. If he opens the curtain he is gaining pleasure but the person on the other side is gaining pain, both mentally and physically.

  2. Benthams theory Act Utilitarianism has many strengths and weaknesses.

    of pain for that minority and the pain of this minority could out way the pleasure of the majority but it is too hard and long to use the hedonic calculus in some situations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work