• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Descartes developed Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how Descartes developed Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary [25 marks] The ontological argument is concerned with the being or nature of God. Anselm's main argument that he put forth was that God's existence is necessary, he summarised it in four main points: God is the greatest possible being which can be conceived, God may exist in the mind alone or in reality as well, something which exists in reality and in the mind is greater than something that exists as an idea in the mind alone, and Therefore, God must exist in reality and in the mind.Anselms argument is a reply to the fool who says there is no God and this gives Anselm a starting point. ...read more.

Middle

Anything which has to exist and cannot fail to exist is said by philosophers exist by necessity. Most things that exist depend on something else for their existence, for example, your home only exists in reality because some built it, you cannot say your home had to exist, because it was up to the builder to decide whether to build it. This type of existence is identified as contingent existence. Contingent existence refers to something which depends on referring to something else to fully explain why it exists. In reference to the question, Descarte developed Anselm's argument, that God's existence is necessary. Descarte claim that God has placed in every person the idea of God. ...read more.

Conclusion

Part of God's essence is therefore existence. Descarte argues that God existing is as fundamental to the nature of God as the interior angles of the triangle. For Descarte, the essence of God is that God exists and existence is a predicate of God. As Anselms put forth the definition of predicate, in philosophical terms, to indicate an intrinsic property or quality of something, therefore the predicate of God is His existence. Descarte went on to further develop Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary by using three simultaneous arguments, firstly, God is a supremely perfect being, secondly, a property perfect is existence, therefore God existences. Existence, so far as Descarte is concerned, is a perfection of God in the same way as a mountain and a valley going together. You cannot talk about God unless God exists because God is perfect and part of perfection is existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the ontological argument from Anselm and Descartes.

    he was familiar with the "Proslogium", Descartes' argument for God's existence is essentially a modernised version of the Anselm's argument.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    This means that statements are either analytic or synthetic. Analytic statements analysis the meaning of words, for example 'All vixens are female'. Synthetic statements are statements that aren't analytic. 2. 'Relations of Ideas' can be known a priori, by intuition or deduction. This applies to geometry, algebra and arithmetic.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Either God exists or 7+5=14 (2) It is false that 7+5=14 (3) Therefore God exists This is a valid deductive argument in that the conclusion follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion is certainly true. But it is not a 'good' deductive argument.

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    of this logic used on the existence of God, He argues that such necessary propositions are only true if such being exists. Kant also proposes that the statement ??God exists?? must either be an analytic or synthetic statement explaining the predicate must either be inside or outside the statement.

  1. Reductive physicalist accounts of the mind fail to fully explain the nature of mental ...

    This leaves the Behaviourists with the problem of linking one particular mental state to one particular behaviour; without first making assumptions about what other mental states that person has. Overall then, this leads to a threat of regress ? it seeming impossible for Behaviourists to define any one mental states until they have already defined lots of other mental states.

  2. Explain Anselms ontological argument.

    if he wasn?t the greatest possible being then surely we could conceive of something greater.)

  1. EXPLAIN THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FROM ANSELM AND DESCARTES

    Therefore, God, being the greatest possible being, has to exist, since an idea in the mind is not as great as an idea that exists in reality. The idea that exists in reality has the extra property of ?existence?. To be the greatest possible being, God must, necessarily, have his property of existence.

  2. Assess whether Descartes succeeds in establishing the existence of God

    From here Descartes concludes that nothing contains equal perfection to God other God himself and therefore only He could be capable of the idea in Descartes? mind and as a result must exist in order for it to be there.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work