• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Descartes developed Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how Descartes developed Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary [25 marks] The ontological argument is concerned with the being or nature of God. Anselm's main argument that he put forth was that God's existence is necessary, he summarised it in four main points: God is the greatest possible being which can be conceived, God may exist in the mind alone or in reality as well, something which exists in reality and in the mind is greater than something that exists as an idea in the mind alone, and Therefore, God must exist in reality and in the mind.Anselms argument is a reply to the fool who says there is no God and this gives Anselm a starting point. ...read more.

Middle

Anything which has to exist and cannot fail to exist is said by philosophers exist by necessity. Most things that exist depend on something else for their existence, for example, your home only exists in reality because some built it, you cannot say your home had to exist, because it was up to the builder to decide whether to build it. This type of existence is identified as contingent existence. Contingent existence refers to something which depends on referring to something else to fully explain why it exists. In reference to the question, Descarte developed Anselm's argument, that God's existence is necessary. Descarte claim that God has placed in every person the idea of God. ...read more.

Conclusion

Part of God's essence is therefore existence. Descarte argues that God existing is as fundamental to the nature of God as the interior angles of the triangle. For Descarte, the essence of God is that God exists and existence is a predicate of God. As Anselms put forth the definition of predicate, in philosophical terms, to indicate an intrinsic property or quality of something, therefore the predicate of God is His existence. Descarte went on to further develop Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary by using three simultaneous arguments, firstly, God is a supremely perfect being, secondly, a property perfect is existence, therefore God existences. Existence, so far as Descarte is concerned, is a perfection of God in the same way as a mountain and a valley going together. You cannot talk about God unless God exists because God is perfect and part of perfection is existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume wrote in 'Dialogues concerning Natural Religion' However much our concept of an object we may contain, we must go outside it to determine whether it exists. We cannot just define something into existence - even if it has all the perfections one can imagine.

  2. Outline the ontological argument as presented by Anselm and Descartes.

    To suggest that God is necessary is to suggest that there is no possibility of him to not exist. To do this, Anselm suggested that we need to know more than that He simply exists inside and outside our minds.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Should euthanasia be classified as murder? Is murder always wrong? A challenge to the premises of an argument is a challenge not to the argument's validity, but to the argument's 'goodness'. An argument may be deductively valid but not good. The American philosopher of Religion Alvin Plantinga suggests this as a possible argument for God's existence: (1)

  2. The Metamorphosis: Existence.

    (pg 4). Gregor passes time by avoiding his boss, trying to earn enough money so that he can pay back his parents, which he claims will take up to "five or six years" and painlessly avoiding intimate relationships, a side effect he argues comes with the profession.

  1. Quoting from the text, explain in your own words Descartes' trademark argument for Gods ...

    The idea of God being infinite however cannot be gained though our senses. There is nothing from which we can get the idea of infinity thus it must be innate. It is only logical therefore for God to have left this idea imprinted on our brain.

  2. Reductive physicalist accounts of the mind fail to fully explain the nature of mental ...

    Just like the chemical composure of water is H2O and lightening is a pattern of electric discharges, pain is simply C Fibres in the brain firing ? a simple, yet convincing, explanation of how mental states are just physical ones.

  1. Explain Anselms ontological argument.

    Hence god does exist both in reality and in the understanding; therefore we can also conclude that the fool in reality is actually a fool. (The fool is denying the existence of the greatest possible being, this being must exist for it to be the greatest possible being, and

  2. Assess whether Descartes succeeds in establishing the existence of God

    From here Descartes concludes that nothing contains equal perfection to God other God himself and therefore only He could be capable of the idea in Descartes? mind and as a result must exist in order for it to be there.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work