• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how ethical theories respond to the Just War theory

Extracts from this document...

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    Examples of meaningless statements are 'stealing is wrong' or 'God exists'. Meaningless in this context only means that there is no way the statement can be proved true or false. The statements really mean 'I disapprove of stealing therefore I think it is wrong' or 'I happen to have a

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    and concluded with the Seventh Ecumenical Council (787). Over this four hundred and sixty-three year period, the Church clarified its understanding and teaching of the revelation regarding Jesus Christ. At the center of this process stood the Ecumenical Councils, which constituted the final and most authoritative agent for the formulation

  1. Is the term 'Just War' now outdated?

    being used, a proportionate response by definition will not be a just one either. This puts certain states in a difficult position in terms of following the Just War principles. The organization identified as responsible, Al-Qa'ida, are not representative of any one country.

  2. Just War

    evil and again to move unto it; and we do certainly know, and so testify to the world, that the spirit of Christ, which leads us into all truth, will never move us to fight and war against any man with outward weapons, neither for the kingdom of Christ, nor for the kingdom of this world.

  1. An analysis of a film that does more than just entertain its audience: Blade ...

    Why am I here? What does it mean to be human? Thus, the eternal problems in the film are essentially moral ones; that is, should replicants kill to gain more life? Should Deckard kill replicants simply because they want to exist? Defining the human, however, provides most of Blade Runner's philosophical focus.

  2. Compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories; which makes a better societal order?

    regarded as an end in itself, as stated in the Formula of the End in Itself: Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work