• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Natural Law is both teleological and deontological.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Explain how Natural Law is both teleological and deontological. Natural Law, according to Cicero is, ?right reason in agreement with nature.? In other words, Natural Law is a set of five distinct principles which every human being is naturally inclined to live their life by. These five principles are known as the primary precepts. It is said by many that Natural Law is purely deontological considering the fact that you have a duty not to go against the primary precepts. However, if one delves deeper into the origins of Natural Law they will find that in fact, it comes from an Aristotelean teleological worldview and therefore, Natural Law is both teleological and deontological. ...read more.

Middle

According to Aquinas, Natural Law is the divine will of God and thus, one is sinning if they do something which goes against Natural Law. For example, Aquinas would say that contraception is intrinsically wrong and is an apparent good instead of a real good due to the fact that it goes against the primary precept of reproduction. The fact that Natural Law focuses much on the ethicalness on an action and on the duty to a set of rules shows that without a doubt, Natural Law is deontological. ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact that Natural Law is concerned with the consequences of our actions show that Natural Law is definitely teleological. However, Natural Law is not simply just deontological or just teleological but instead it is a combination of the both. This is for the reason that firstly, we have no choice on whether to follow them or not, as otherwise we would be going against the divine will of God and our own human nature and secondly, we follow Natural Law with regard to the consequences of our actions, and on whether our actions help us to fulfil our God given telos. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    This is summarised in Kant's quote: "There is only one good thing and that is a good will" Kant also proposed a 'categorical imperative' which asserted whether a moral action is good or bad. Kant defined an imperative as any proposition that declares a certain kind of action (or inaction)

  2. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Unless we reconnect with the source of our ethical precepts, grounding moral rules like "don't lie" in deep moral habits and our religious tradition, once the latest crisis of confidence passes, it will be business as usual. As we work to reestablish an ethical structure to business behavior, we had best remember our need for religious moorings.

  1. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    Irrespective of the circumstance and consequences? Although many people would agree that the idea of absolute rules is good, many people have problems with it and say that there are times when making exceptions is morally permissible. The situation of our duties conflicting is again another damaging criticism to Kant's theory.

  2. The Teleological Argument

    He then concluded that an external agent must have imposed order on the universe as a whole and this agent is God. Another aspect of the teleological argument is Design Qua Purpose, which is put forward by Paley in the first part of his book.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    Paternalism of that kind is just one path open to QL; among the others is the very opposite, that suppresses the values of kin, physicians, law, and society in order to promote those of the patient herself, insofar as they can be ascertained, even if this means rejecting available therapies in order to hasten death.

  2. Duties and Deontological Ethics

    For example, if I have a right to own my car, then you have a duty not to steal my car. From a moral standpoint, Pufendorf believed that duties were more important than rights. Second, Pufendorf distinguished between perfect and imperfect duties.

  1. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Once we have answered this question we can evaluate things in terms of whether they would help us reach our objective or would interfere with attaining it. This approach is teleological, because it is concerned with movement towards an ultimate objective.

  2. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Finally you must act as if you live in a kingdom of ends, in other words you must act morally despite what others are doing. You cannot base your own intentions upon the intentions of others, "I will do X because everyone else does X" as if this were the case, society would become chaotic, with no real moral code.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work