• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Natural Law is both teleological and deontological.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain how Natural Law is both teleological and deontological. Natural Law, according to Cicero is, ?right reason in agreement with nature.? In other words, Natural Law is a set of five distinct principles which every human being is naturally inclined to live their life by. These five principles are known as the primary precepts. It is said by many that Natural Law is purely deontological considering the fact that you have a duty not to go against the primary precepts. However, if one delves deeper into the origins of Natural Law they will find that in fact, it comes from an Aristotelean teleological worldview and therefore, Natural Law is both teleological and deontological. ...read more.


According to Aquinas, Natural Law is the divine will of God and thus, one is sinning if they do something which goes against Natural Law. For example, Aquinas would say that contraception is intrinsically wrong and is an apparent good instead of a real good due to the fact that it goes against the primary precept of reproduction. The fact that Natural Law focuses much on the ethicalness on an action and on the duty to a set of rules shows that without a doubt, Natural Law is deontological. ...read more.


The fact that Natural Law is concerned with the consequences of our actions show that Natural Law is definitely teleological. However, Natural Law is not simply just deontological or just teleological but instead it is a combination of the both. This is for the reason that firstly, we have no choice on whether to follow them or not, as otherwise we would be going against the divine will of God and our own human nature and secondly, we follow Natural Law with regard to the consequences of our actions, and on whether our actions help us to fulfil our God given telos. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Unless we reconnect with the source of our ethical precepts, grounding moral rules like "don't lie" in deep moral habits and our religious tradition, once the latest crisis of confidence passes, it will be business as usual. As we work to reestablish an ethical structure to business behavior, we had best remember our need for religious moorings.

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    This is summarised in Kant's quote: "There is only one good thing and that is a good will" Kant also proposed a 'categorical imperative' which asserted whether a moral action is good or bad. Kant defined an imperative as any proposition that declares a certain kind of action (or inaction)

  1. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    Another very damaging criticism of Kant's theory is the s-called contradiction in nature. The problem lies in Kant's exclusion of exceptions. Telling the truth is said, by Kant, to always be wrong, but must telling the truth always be right?

  2. The Teleological Argument

    Alternatively, David Hume challenged the teleological argument; he stated that even if there is order and purpose in the universe, it still does not suggest that it was the work of God. The design could have been the work of several lesser gods, or alternatively, an apprentice god who moved on to create better and bigger worlds.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    Proponents would have to go beyond vegetarianism to complete fasting unto death, like some Jains, or else interpret all eating as the tragic choice in a conflict of duties to sacrifice some life for more life.[Note 9] Note, though, that while some SL can justify preventive killing, it must always be by quantitative not qualitative standards.

  2. Duties and Deontological Ethics

    For example, if I have a right to own my car, then you have a duty not to steal my car. From a moral standpoint, Pufendorf believed that duties were more important than rights. Second, Pufendorf distinguished between perfect and imperfect duties.

  1. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Finally you must act as if you live in a kingdom of ends, in other words you must act morally despite what others are doing. You cannot base your own intentions upon the intentions of others, "I will do X because everyone else does X" as if this were the case, society would become chaotic, with no real moral code.

  2. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Once we have answered this question we can evaluate things in terms of whether they would help us reach our objective or would interfere with attaining it. This approach is teleological, because it is concerned with movement towards an ultimate objective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work