• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Natural Law is both teleological and deontological.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain how Natural Law is both teleological and deontological. Natural Law, according to Cicero is, ?right reason in agreement with nature.? In other words, Natural Law is a set of five distinct principles which every human being is naturally inclined to live their life by. These five principles are known as the primary precepts. It is said by many that Natural Law is purely deontological considering the fact that you have a duty not to go against the primary precepts. However, if one delves deeper into the origins of Natural Law they will find that in fact, it comes from an Aristotelean teleological worldview and therefore, Natural Law is both teleological and deontological. ...read more.


According to Aquinas, Natural Law is the divine will of God and thus, one is sinning if they do something which goes against Natural Law. For example, Aquinas would say that contraception is intrinsically wrong and is an apparent good instead of a real good due to the fact that it goes against the primary precept of reproduction. The fact that Natural Law focuses much on the ethicalness on an action and on the duty to a set of rules shows that without a doubt, Natural Law is deontological. ...read more.


The fact that Natural Law is concerned with the consequences of our actions show that Natural Law is definitely teleological. However, Natural Law is not simply just deontological or just teleological but instead it is a combination of the both. This is for the reason that firstly, we have no choice on whether to follow them or not, as otherwise we would be going against the divine will of God and our own human nature and secondly, we follow Natural Law with regard to the consequences of our actions, and on whether our actions help us to fulfil our God given telos. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    of that requirement is generally satisfied at the end of a long day of "substantive" learning. However, investors and clients are beginning to realize that ethics is a part of substantive business. Lawyers and accountants have so long viewed themselves as being mouthpieces for a particular spin on a client's

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Kant imaged a 'Kingdom of Ends' in which entirely rational beings live in harmony by common principles and with respect for others. With regard to morality, Kant argued that the source of the good lies not in anything outside the human subject, either in nature or given by God, but rather only in a good will.

  1. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    The discussion of the so-called contradiction in the will (going against what you want) is a major criticism of Kant's theory. Kant suggests that a solution to this problem is to offer a practical test. This would allow us to reject the rules which if were to be universalised, would be totally objectionable to all rational human beings.

  2. The Teleological Argument

    The evidence from astronomy and Newton's laws of motion and gravity influenced his argument, to prove design in the universe exists. He stated that the rotation of the planets in the solar system and the gravity that holds the solar system together could not have come about by chance.

  1. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Once we have answered this question we can evaluate things in terms of whether they would help us reach our objective or would interfere with attaining it. This approach is teleological, because it is concerned with movement towards an ultimate objective.

  2. Duties and Deontological Ethics

    For example, if I have a right to own my car, then you have a duty not to steal my car. From a moral standpoint, Pufendorf believed that duties were more important than rights. Second, Pufendorf distinguished between perfect and imperfect duties.

  1. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Finally you must act as if you live in a kingdom of ends, in other words you must act morally despite what others are doing. You cannot base your own intentions upon the intentions of others, "I will do X because everyone else does X" as if this were the case, society would become chaotic, with no real moral code.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    worth living for her or, vicariously, for ourselves should we find ourselves in a similar situation. We may take a different route, and affirm that such a life would be worth living for ourselves -but decide to respect autonomy on the ground that the harm of overriding it would be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work