• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how relative ethical theories work to solve issues

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain how relative ethical theories work to solve issues (25 marks) Relative ethics is a more flexible approach to solving modern issues. It usually involves looking at the individual situation and weighing up the consequences of each action. Nothing is objectively right or wrong in any circumstances and morality depends on the time, culture and particular individual. Examples of relativist ethical theories are utilitarianism and situation ethics. Moral relativism is the opposite belief to moral absolutism. Absolutists believe that certain actions are intrinsically wrong and cannot be questioned. Whereas relativists believe that the right or wrong thing to do depends on the situation Joseph fletcher said that the right action is the one that produces the most beneficial consequences. ...read more.


However for a moral relativist is may be the most loving thing to do and will create the most beneficial results. This does not mean abortion is always right, but the morality changes with each individual situation. Utilitarianism is another form of relative ethics. It is teleological and looks to find the maximum pleasure for the most people involved. Therefore morality changes in each circumstance. Bentham was an Act utilitarian and he used his hedonic calculus in order to calculate how much pleasure would come from an action. Mill was a weak Rule utilitarian. This means there are some laws that should be made but they can be broken if it would provide a better outcome. ...read more.


For example, if it is tradition in one area to have slaves then it is respectful of the people?s beliefs. It also recognises that morality changes over time, so laws should change with society. However someone could argue that it does not protect human rights. For example, torturing children is always wrong no matter the culture and it should not be tolerated. In conclusion, moral relativism is a flexible ethical theory. It is the opposite of absolutism. Absolutism says that things are either objectively right or wrong intrinsically. Whereas relativism says that there are no objective right or wrong actions and the right thing to do is dependent on the circumstances. Most relativism is teleological and consequential which means they look for the action that will create the best outcome for everyone involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Ethics and Morality section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Ethics and Morality essays

  1. Explain Kant's moral argument

    Kant believes that the highest good must be achievable; otherwise moral goodness would ultimately be pointless. Even though the Summum Bonum cannot be guaranteed in the world by doing your duty, Kant believes that God?s existence is the guarantee that moral virtue and the Summum Bonum are achievable.

  2. Considering the Ethics of Abortion

    Hence determining God?s will is the matter of greatest significance in all ethical matters, abortion included. Religious ethics disagrees with some forms of secular ethics as they are now understood and practised. Currently in secular discourse there is a tendency to reduce questions as to whether to abort or not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work