• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot be fully explained by the theodicies, discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Philosophy and Ethics Chris Hadden 26/4/09 Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine. (25 marks) The problem of evil and suffering can be the major obstacle between non believers and faith. For these people it is impossible to contemplate a God who chooses to inflict the pain and misery onto the world that is easily apparent. Philosophers have therefore looked for explanations for why an omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent God would do such things. This question is summed up in Augustine's creation, the inconsistent triad. Augustine summarised that an omnipotent and good God and evil in the world point to a contradiction, only two of the three points can ever exist harmoniously. Yet Augustine strived to prove this idea wrong. Augustine theorised that in the beginning (in his opinion Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden) that the world was in fact perfect. There was no evil or suffering and the world was a perfect place to exist in. Augustine claims that it was the choice of Eve to eat from the forbidden tree that lowered human's perfection and created evil and suffering. As we are all descendants of Adam and Eve, we all carry the burden of that crime with us to this day. ...read more.


In our attempts to overcome the challenges laid in front of us we sometimes make the wrong choices resulting in evil and suffering. On other occasions we try to deny the existence of God and lose all goodness in an attempt to compete with the idea of God. Both offer explanations for why moral evil exists in the world. Without the free will that allows these immoral actions to occur we would not be, according to Irenaeus, be in the image of God. Both theories offer alternative approaches to evil and suffering and both rely on belief in the afterlife to be effective. Yet Augustine places the blame for evil and suffering firmly at the door of mankind whereas Irenaeus places evil and suffering in the natural order of things describing it as a way in which God matures us as individuals and draws us closer to him. Evil cannot be fully explained by the theodicies, discuss. (10 marks) Despite the arguments of both Irenaeus and Augustine, atheists and agnostics alike are not convinced. This is mainly down to the unanswered questions that the theodicies leave in their wake. Many find the clinical almost mathematic approach to the problem to be insensitive and unrealistic when you look at cases of extreme suffering. ...read more.


In Augustine's theodicy we are introduced to the idea that evil is just the absence for good. Yet serious evil such as murder, rape, child abuse, or terrorism seem to be much more than simply the absence of good, there is for many a difference between lack of good and evil. With reference to the idea that Augustine's idea that forces of good and evil are in a battle, this introduces the idea that there is hell. Yet if God is in fact omnipotent why does he allow such a place to exist? Yet there is definite value in the theodicies, they offer logical and well reasoned explanations for why there is evil and suffering in a world created by an omnipotent, omnipresent, benevolent God. Augustine uses the idea presented within The Bible, (the most popular book ever) that Eve was at fault for the fall of mankind. This idea sits well with people who do believe in the creation story. Evil as part of Irenaean theory is not a punishment but a tool to for "soul making" (John Hick). This theory allows people to have optimism through suffering and gives value to the growth that follows suffering. So despite the flaws of the two main theodicies there are strong cores to both ideas that can offer solace for people struggling with the problem of evil and suffering. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the theodicy of Irenaeus. Irenaeus theodicy is the response to the problem of ...

    clear that we are not actually able to choose our actions, as there is nothing for us to choose from, this therefore would mean that there is no such thing as free will.

  2. The Goodness of God

    Both support the Free Will Defence and believe that evil is the absence of good not a power of its own. This means that humans also learn to love God as a free choice and learn goodness like self-sacrifice and sympathy when they see other suffering from moral and natural evil.


    Also, the creation of Hell is puzzling because surely God would not create it unless 'He' knew that 'The Fall' would happen which further questions 'His' perfection.

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    St Thomas Aquinas established Aristotle's view on the aspect of the function of the soul, and agreed that the soul was the force animating the body, giving it life. In his book "Suma Theologica" Aquinas referred to the soul as the 'anima', which means ' that which animates the body',

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Given the frequency of unexplainable occurrences such as these they do seem be a reasonable argument for life after death. There have been a number of 'sightings' of dead people, which also constitute as arguments for life after death. Dr Deepak Chopra stated that bodies are comprised of energy.

  2. problem of evil

    as it is not just going to disappear, evil and suffering are objective realities which are almost impossible to deny. B) Unpack two theodicies and analyse which how successful these are As I said, the justification of God's allowance for the existence of evil is not easy, but there are many theodicies which have developed that provide strong arguments.

  1. Explain and evaluate Augustine's Theodicy

    today, due to sin committed by past generations, many years back, with the Bible even going against this idea. Also, would an omnibenevolent God allow sinners to suffer eternally in Hell?

  2. ) Explain the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine ?

    Adam and Eve suffered when they were expelled from the Garden of Eden, due to the fact that they were immature and needed time to develop. Just like them we are ?human animals? and need to develop to become ?children of God?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work