• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot be fully explained by the theodicies, discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Philosophy and Ethics Chris Hadden 26/4/09 Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine. (25 marks) The problem of evil and suffering can be the major obstacle between non believers and faith. For these people it is impossible to contemplate a God who chooses to inflict the pain and misery onto the world that is easily apparent. Philosophers have therefore looked for explanations for why an omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent God would do such things. This question is summed up in Augustine's creation, the inconsistent triad. Augustine summarised that an omnipotent and good God and evil in the world point to a contradiction, only two of the three points can ever exist harmoniously. Yet Augustine strived to prove this idea wrong. Augustine theorised that in the beginning (in his opinion Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden) that the world was in fact perfect. There was no evil or suffering and the world was a perfect place to exist in. Augustine claims that it was the choice of Eve to eat from the forbidden tree that lowered human's perfection and created evil and suffering. As we are all descendants of Adam and Eve, we all carry the burden of that crime with us to this day. ...read more.


In our attempts to overcome the challenges laid in front of us we sometimes make the wrong choices resulting in evil and suffering. On other occasions we try to deny the existence of God and lose all goodness in an attempt to compete with the idea of God. Both offer explanations for why moral evil exists in the world. Without the free will that allows these immoral actions to occur we would not be, according to Irenaeus, be in the image of God. Both theories offer alternative approaches to evil and suffering and both rely on belief in the afterlife to be effective. Yet Augustine places the blame for evil and suffering firmly at the door of mankind whereas Irenaeus places evil and suffering in the natural order of things describing it as a way in which God matures us as individuals and draws us closer to him. Evil cannot be fully explained by the theodicies, discuss. (10 marks) Despite the arguments of both Irenaeus and Augustine, atheists and agnostics alike are not convinced. This is mainly down to the unanswered questions that the theodicies leave in their wake. Many find the clinical almost mathematic approach to the problem to be insensitive and unrealistic when you look at cases of extreme suffering. ...read more.


In Augustine's theodicy we are introduced to the idea that evil is just the absence for good. Yet serious evil such as murder, rape, child abuse, or terrorism seem to be much more than simply the absence of good, there is for many a difference between lack of good and evil. With reference to the idea that Augustine's idea that forces of good and evil are in a battle, this introduces the idea that there is hell. Yet if God is in fact omnipotent why does he allow such a place to exist? Yet there is definite value in the theodicies, they offer logical and well reasoned explanations for why there is evil and suffering in a world created by an omnipotent, omnipresent, benevolent God. Augustine uses the idea presented within The Bible, (the most popular book ever) that Eve was at fault for the fall of mankind. This idea sits well with people who do believe in the creation story. Evil as part of Irenaean theory is not a punishment but a tool to for "soul making" (John Hick). This theory allows people to have optimism through suffering and gives value to the growth that follows suffering. So despite the flaws of the two main theodicies there are strong cores to both ideas that can offer solace for people struggling with the problem of evil and suffering. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the theodicy of Irenaeus. Irenaeus theodicy is the response to the problem of ...

    clear that we are not actually able to choose our actions, as there is nothing for us to choose from, this therefore would mean that there is no such thing as free will.

  2. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    like Christians have claimed that the holy waters at Lourdes heal sicknesses. R.F Holland does not insist upon a transcendence of natural law to count as a miracle - 'a coincidence can be taken religiously as a sign and called a miracle'.

  1. Explain and evaluate Augustine's Theodicy

    today, due to sin committed by past generations, many years back, with the Bible even going against this idea. Also, would an omnibenevolent God allow sinners to suffer eternally in Hell?

  2. Reductive physicalist accounts of the mind fail to fully explain the nature of mental ...

    were the university, not something else (mind). Be that as it may, what about the case of the actor who apparently expresses all the right behavioural symptoms of pain, but is in fact not actually in pain. According to behaviourist theory we would we would have to deduce that the

  1. Explain the Irenaean Theodicy

    Some theists believe that suffering the most is a good thing, as you will be rewarded with more in the afterlife, and so God is actually being loving by picking the less fortunate to suffer. Irenaeus solved this problem with the idea of original sin.

  2. discuss the claim that any belief in life after death is a theodicy in ...

    Furthermore, the very existence of evil and suffering would have no meaning or purpose if some people end up being punished for eternity. Unending torment could never lead to good and is incompatible with an all loving God. David Hume claimed that the whole idea of hell calls God?s justice

  1. Irenaen Theodicy cannot justify the existence of evil. Discuss

    as hunger and pain are considered evil by some, however without hunger there would be no way to know that you were in fact hungry and without pain there would be no way to know that you have been hurt or injured.

  2. ) Explain the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine ?

    Adam and Eve suffered when they were expelled from the Garden of Eden, due to the fact that they were immature and needed time to develop. Just like them we are ?human animals? and need to develop to become ?children of God?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work