• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant(TM)s moral argument for the existence of God and Kant was wrong to suggest that we all share a sense of right and wrong(TM) Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Philosophy and Ethics Christopher Hadden Kant's Moral Argument "Explain Kant's moral argument for the existence of God" (25 marks) Kant's Moral argument is unique to other arguments for God's existence as it doesn't prove God's existence it only suggests it. Another key difference to other arguments is that Kant's moral argument doesn't see the existence of God as necessary, they all use reasoning to reach the conclusion of existence. This existence is dependent on reasoning whereas for Kant as humans we can never prove God's existence as this requires the higher knowledge that only God possesses. Kant's argument is far more based on belief than other traditional arguments such as the teleological and ontological. Nevertheless Kant still follows logical reasoned steps to create his argument. Overall Kant's argument is based around the idea that we all have an inbuilt moral code, an innate sense of right and wrong and that all people feel this same sense of conscience. Kant believed that this idea of morality or conscience was direction from God. ...read more.


Kant didn't ever claim that this argument could prove the existence of God nor did he aim to persuade non believers. It is Kant's claim that we instinctively know what is right and wrong and also instinctively know that we should follow right and believe that this behaviour should be rewarded. This innate sense of justice and moral structure cannot function in this life despite the fact that it ought to exist, and according to Kant this shows that an afterlife with God is there to provide this. 'Kant was wrong to suggest that we all share a sense of right and wrong' Discuss (10 marks) There is no way of providing solid evidence for or against Kant's notion of universal morality, as morality is internal and cannot be accurately judged or measured exteriorly. Kant claims that there is an innate moral understanding within all of us and that we feel obliged to follow this moral outline. Kant uses this idea to claim that God is the reason for this inward morality and moral drive. ...read more.


And as ought is relative then so too must morality as, after all morality is a judgement of what we ought to do, and if ought is at the discretion of the individual then so to must morality. This would lead us further towards Freud's ideas on morality. He believed that morality within any individual comes from outside influence such as parents siblings and society, Freud claimed that these sources provide ideas on morality which in some cases are internalised within the individual at a young age and become their moral values. In this way any culture and even different cultures could have very similar moral beliefs. This could easily explain how there are similarities between cultural moralities. Kant's argument offers an explanation for the existence of God and his idea of universal morality is plausible but both are not conclusively proved nor can they ever be. Due to the impossible nature of judging morality we can never truly know whether morality is universal, yet certain individual cases demonstrate an amoral personality which would contradict this theory. Kant's theory and his idea of universal morality both rely heavily upon the acceptance of other ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain what you think is the strongest objection to this argument. Next, explain what ...

    when they acted that made actively killing as wrong as passively letting die. I believe that Rachel wrote a very good essay, and that his point was made clear, but there were some loops on it in which you could hold on to "reject" his arguments and specially in the

  2. Explain Anselm ontological argument

    For5 somebody to say that God can not exist would be a contradiction because God is 'that than which noting greater can be conceive,' therefore god has to have an existence. In his second argument Anselm concludes that God cannot be conceived not to exist.

  1. Explain Aquinass cosmological argument

    in terms of the A postreiori knowledge that is visible to all of us, such as the fact that everything has a cause, makes the existence of God seem necessary and almost obvious. The argument that the universe is infinite is also a good one, as everything within the universe

  2. Every adult has the right to become a parent. Discuss

    Furthermore, many would argue that whether a parent could look after a child, for example if a parent was disabled, would be a condition to take into account, as a child's right to be looked after and supported would then be overlooked.

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    The fourth objection may be regarded as the Humean Problem. It is obvious from all that has been said that Kant lays absolute primacy on the faculty of human reason. Like Plato, Aristotle, Descartes and many others he sees rationality as the distinguishing feature of human beings.

  2. Discuss critically the belief that conscience is the voice of God.

    I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do.' Like everyone else ultimately a Christian must make a personal decision about a personal, local or global moral issue.

  1. Does everyone have a right to a child?

    intercourse or artificial treatments such as IVF. Scenarios Scenario 1 In this scenario a married woman who has had her embryo's frozen has passed away but she wishes for her embryo's to be destroyed as she had passed away, but her husband now wants to use the embryo's to carry his dead wife's child/baby.

  2. Explain what Kant means by 'summum bonum'

    It is important to note that consequences are not important to Kant, since he is not a utilitarian. So, if it is one?s duty to tell the truth, one should do so no matter what the consequence or cost is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work