• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's categorical imperative.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain Kant?s categorical imperative (25 marks). Kant is an 18th century German philosopher who wrote the book Groundwork for metaphysics. The book deals with his theory that morality is a priori synthetic (a priori is a statement that is knowable without reference to any experience and synthetic means having truth or falsity can be tested using experience or the senses) and that moral decisions should be taken with a universal view to one?s duty to mankind as a whole. He laid out his ideas about the categorical imperative in this book. An imperative is a statement of what should be done. The philosopher Hume said that you can?t get a ?should? statement out of an ?if? statement. This means that experience can only give us hypothetical imperatives (not moral commands to the will ? they are ?if? statements and do not apply to everyone and you only need obey them if you want to achieve a certain goal, for example, ?if? you want to be healthy then you should exercise and eat a balanced diet). ...read more.

Middle

If not, then you are involved in a contradiction and what you are thinking of doing is wrong because it is against reason. Kant uses the example of a suicidal man as an example: A man feels sick of life and wants to commit suicide. His maxim is that from self-love I want to shorten my life if its continuance threatens more evil than it promises pleasure. He asks himself whether he would universalise this law, his answer is no because it is humans? duty to stimulate the furtherance of life and to destroy life would contradict itself and therefore is entirely opposed to the supreme principle of duty. The second principle is to treat humans as ends in themselves: ?so act as to treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of any other, never solely as a means but always as an end?. Kant argues that all humans are searching for the summam bonum (a state in which human virtue and happiness are united). ...read more.

Conclusion

What this means is that every individual has the ability to understand the principles of pure practical reason and follow them. Pure practical reason must be impartial and so its principles must apply equally to everyone. An example of this is if you?re trying to decide if it would be justified to kill someone who was threatening your family ? using Kantian principles ? you should not kill them. Acting according to the third principle (and taking the first and second into account) murder can obviously not be universalised or humanity would be wiped out, and killing the man threatening your family is treating him as a means (to saving your family) rather than an end: a human seeking summum bonum. In conclusion, there are three different formulations for Kant?s categorical imperative: The Universal Law, treat humans as ends in themselves and act as if you live in a Kingdom of Ends. Together these three formulations seek to allow humans to make moral decisions which do not infringe the happiness of others but also allow us to progress to perfection. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    He could have just been using relativism and judged by the social norms that abortion was wrong. Furthermore there wasn't the technology for abortion that there is today. Abortion would have been seen as dirty and disgusting. This has been similar throughout history.

  2. A. Explain what Kant meant by the categorical argument. B. Asses Kant's claims critically ...

    No outcome should we achieve it, can be unconditionally good. Fortune can be misused, what we thought may be good might actually be harmful!

  1. Kant and the Categorical Imperative

    Firstly, one of the three principles of the categorical imperative is that each person has an intrinsic value; a value beyond price. This is because humans are rational beings, and can make decisions, based on their ability to reason this separates them from al life forms on this earth.

  2. Does Kant's account of categorical imperatives and universal laws elucidate ordinary criteria for judging ...

    He argued that moral duties are unconditionally necessary, whereas non-moral imperatives are hypothetically imperative. They indicate what is rationally required on some condition, such as having a certain desire or interest. The only appropriate motive for moral action is a sense of duty.

  1. Explain what Kant meant by the Categorical Imperative.

    If the action would be good simply as a means to something else, then the imperative is hypothetical; but if the action is represented as a good in itself...then the imperative is categorical." Kant does not specifically provide us with a set of rules or laws that we should follow,

  2. Is Christ a Kantian?

    Of course, Kant is clever enough to use the term 'imperfect duty' in place of the word 'some', but if duty can be imperfect, then the circle can look like a square.) I believe the resolving of this dualism in ethical philosophy is as monumental as the resolving of the body-mind dualism in metaphysics.

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    This is the crucial starting point of Kant's theory. We are the rational agents or authors of our moral destinies, and there must be a purity of motive underlying our actions if they are to be called morally worthwhile. The Moral Law and the Two Types of Imperative The purity

  2. Explain what Kant means by 'summum bonum'

    It is important to note that consequences are not important to Kant, since he is not a utilitarian. So, if it is one?s duty to tell the truth, one should do so no matter what the consequence or cost is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work