• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's categorical imperative.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain Kant?s categorical imperative (25 marks). Kant is an 18th century German philosopher who wrote the book Groundwork for metaphysics. The book deals with his theory that morality is a priori synthetic (a priori is a statement that is knowable without reference to any experience and synthetic means having truth or falsity can be tested using experience or the senses) and that moral decisions should be taken with a universal view to one?s duty to mankind as a whole. He laid out his ideas about the categorical imperative in this book. An imperative is a statement of what should be done. The philosopher Hume said that you can?t get a ?should? statement out of an ?if? statement. This means that experience can only give us hypothetical imperatives (not moral commands to the will ? they are ?if? statements and do not apply to everyone and you only need obey them if you want to achieve a certain goal, for example, ?if? you want to be healthy then you should exercise and eat a balanced diet). ...read more.

Middle

If not, then you are involved in a contradiction and what you are thinking of doing is wrong because it is against reason. Kant uses the example of a suicidal man as an example: A man feels sick of life and wants to commit suicide. His maxim is that from self-love I want to shorten my life if its continuance threatens more evil than it promises pleasure. He asks himself whether he would universalise this law, his answer is no because it is humans? duty to stimulate the furtherance of life and to destroy life would contradict itself and therefore is entirely opposed to the supreme principle of duty. The second principle is to treat humans as ends in themselves: ?so act as to treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of any other, never solely as a means but always as an end?. Kant argues that all humans are searching for the summam bonum (a state in which human virtue and happiness are united). ...read more.

Conclusion

What this means is that every individual has the ability to understand the principles of pure practical reason and follow them. Pure practical reason must be impartial and so its principles must apply equally to everyone. An example of this is if you?re trying to decide if it would be justified to kill someone who was threatening your family ? using Kantian principles ? you should not kill them. Acting according to the third principle (and taking the first and second into account) murder can obviously not be universalised or humanity would be wiped out, and killing the man threatening your family is treating him as a means (to saving your family) rather than an end: a human seeking summum bonum. In conclusion, there are three different formulations for Kant?s categorical imperative: The Universal Law, treat humans as ends in themselves and act as if you live in a Kingdom of Ends. Together these three formulations seek to allow humans to make moral decisions which do not infringe the happiness of others but also allow us to progress to perfection. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Suppose that you are suffering from a terminal illness, you may very well wish that anyone, should they find themselves in the same situation, should be able to end their own lives. One may hold the view that it is wrong for a healthy person to commit suicide, but that

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    This is the crucial starting point of Kant's theory. We are the rational agents or authors of our moral destinies, and there must be a purity of motive underlying our actions if they are to be called morally worthwhile. The Moral Law and the Two Types of Imperative The purity

  1. Does Kant's account of categorical imperatives and universal laws elucidate ordinary criteria for judging ...

    time will that it should become a universal law."4 If the maxim, Kant claims, is a genuinely moral one, then it should be universalizable.

  2. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    then the mother is possibly being a good parent and is treating her potential baby with respect. When he was alive, Immanuel Kant would have largely preached that abortion was wrong. However, this is possibly because it was unacceptable at the time.

  1. Kant and the Categorical Imperative

    and increasing admiration and awe the oftener and more steadily we reflect on them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me'. From this quotation, it is clear that Kant believed morality was innate but that reason should determine moral law.

  2. Is Christ a Kantian?

    The correct explanation of ethics must succeed not only in explaining the reason for a Kantian moral act, but also in resolving the problem of dualism in Kantian Ethics. The fourth section will concentrate on the task of demystifying ethics i.e.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    Nothing could be more useful, if it could be done. We will not try to resuscitate a brain-dead patient with a machine that pumps and oxygenates its blood if we have already decided that such a life is so blighted and stunted that it is no longer worth living.

  2. Explain what Kant means by 'summum bonum'

    When Kant refers to ?summum bonum?, he also refers to the idea that doing one?s duty should bring one fulfillment because it is the right thing to do. Happiness is the reward for being virtuous. In other words, happiness and virtue can be, and should be achieved together.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work