• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's Categorical Imperative.

Extracts from this document...


Immanuel Kant Laura Barrett > Explain Kant's Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative is another way to solve moral problems. Kant was interested that there was an interaction between sense perception and human understanding. According to Kant, the morally good man is the man of good will, and that the man of good will is the man who does his duty. An action, therefore only has moral worth if it done from duty. Duty, then, is a consequence of objective or formal necessity, but its representation by a will provides subjective incentive and reflects, or perhaps yields, the material imperative. Kant still hasn't told us where our duty lies. On the other hand Kant rejected the idea that the moral worth of an action lies in the results/consequences. This theory is teleological. In addition Kant must give a deontological theory, the moral worth of an action lies in its obedience to a particular rule or principle regardless of inclinations, self-interest, or consequences. The clearest examples of morally right action are precisely those in which an individual agent's determination to act in accordance with duty overcomes her evident self-interest and obvious desire to do otherwise. But in such a case, Kant argues, the moral value of the action can only reside in a formal principle or "maxim," the general commitment to act in this way because it is one's duty. ...read more.


This is an deontological theory as it its quite possible that, in obeying these rules, you do not promote the greatest possible balance of good over evil. Kant argues that to allow exceptions would harm someone and have consequences on society. The example above would have saved the mother if the person lied. Kant argued that a lie always harms someone, if not the liar then mankind generally, because it contravenes the source of law. If everyone were to act in this way, society would become intolerable. The second principle of Kant's is to treat humans as ends in themselves. "So act that you treat humanity, both in your own person and in the person of every other human being, nearly merely as a means, but always at the same time as an end." Kant (1785) By this Kant means, you can never treat people as means to an end. You can never use human beings for another purpose, to exploit them. Additionally he argued that we have a duty to develop our own perfection i.e. developing our moral abilities. We also have a "duty" to seek the happiness of others, as ling as that is within the law and allows the freedom of others. For example, we shouldn't promote one-person happiness if that happiness prevents another person happiness. ...read more.


Therefore, Kant argues that suicide cannot be morally justified. Conversely, in obeying Kant's law then the man of good is an implement to his reason in a moral matter and what he does is what every reasonable man would do in a similar circumstance. For example "I may steal as all others steal." If this were carried out, society today would become unbearable. Another example could be that if you borrow money of a friend and you promise faithfully to pay it back with no intention of paying it back contradicts the laws of nature because of nature. This is because if we don't honour our promises, no one would trust each other. Furthermore if this theory were carried out it would stop people seeking self-interest. In conclusion, when trying to apply Kant's theory and others like it one must ask if it is possible to give a general rule to each and every individual act or if it is necessary to know the particular purpose and context of each act before one decides its rightness or wrongness. Kant's perception skews the person's thought because each person perceives an event (whatever the event may be) differently. It is this difference in what people perceive that creates opposing viewpoints on "good" whether virtuous or not. But as I pointed out before, if the theory were carried out it would stop people seeking self-interest. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain what Kant meant by the Categorical Imperative.

    However, many Christians would question Kant's place for God, and as the categorical imperative is supposed to apply to everyone, is this something we can overlook as just a matter of religious belief? Kant says that laws have to be of the highest good, containing something that is good within themselves.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Craig Donellan wrote an article called 'The ethics of euthanasia' (2005) explaining what living wills were, mainly giving a concise explanation on how beneficial and easy they are to get. Referring to websites such as 'www.ves.org.uk'. this shows how easy it is to get a living will and information is readily available.

  1. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    As Kant's theory of the Categorical Imperative states that mankind cannot be used as a means to an end, our behaviour is severely restricted. Sometimes, for example during war, sacrifices are necessary and therefore this theory is unsuitable for world politics.

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    It is characterised by the word 'if'. So, for example, 'If you wish to gain praise you must behave in a creditable fashion'. Kant puts it thus: 'If the action is good only as a means to something else, then the imperative is hypothetical' (Fundamental Principles, p.31).

  1. Explain the difference between a hypothetical and categorical imperative - Do you think that ...

    reason quite a bit in your thinking, but I also believe to branch out further and to see the bigger picture you need to obtain morals through observation and by experienceing and observing situtation so that you can can determine your own decision.

  2. A. Explain what Kant meant by the categorical argument. B. Asses Kant's claims critically ...

    No outcome should we achieve it, can be unconditionally good. Fortune can be misused, what we thought may be good might actually be harmful!

  1. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    However, the other person that could be being used as a means to an end is the potential mother.

  2. Does Kant's account of categorical imperatives and universal laws elucidate ordinary criteria for judging ...

    Kant bases his entire argument on reason, he believed that statements about the moral law were a priori and could be reached through logic alone, independent of experience. The only thing in the world that is good without qualification, Kant claimed, is a good will: good intentions are good unconditionally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work