• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's ethical theory

Extracts from this document...


Give an account of Kant's ethical theory Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth century German philosopher whose moral views continue to be influential. His ethical theory is based on a deontological point of view, where the act itself has moral value regardless of the consequences. Kant dismisses emotions such as pity and compassion as irrelevant to morality and thought that making a choice based on feelings or fulfilling our desires is irrelevant when making a morally correct decision. His beliefs oppose that of moral relativism, in which a morally good act is entirely dependant on the circumstances or culture in which it takes place, instead believing in the necessity of a perfectly universalisable moral law. A significant area of ethical study for Kant was the investigation into human reasoning. His views were in response to that of the empiricists and rationalists. The rationalists attempted to prove that we can understand the world purely be using our reasoning, on the other hand empiricists argued that all of our knowledge originates from experience. ...read more.


Duty is what the good will aims to fulfil. It is important that duty is done for its own sake and not to bring pleasure of happiness to yourself of others. For example, it is your duty to help those less fortunate than yourself by giving to charity, but you should not do so just to feel good about yourself. It is only moral if you act purely out of duty and are not guided only by emotions. The categorical imperative is also a crucial part of Kant's ethical theory. The categorical imperative differs from a hypothetical imperative in that acting according to a hypothetical imperative is only to achieve a particular goal. For example, "if I want to be liked I ought to be kind to people". A categorical imperative, however, contains no reference to other ends; they are moral commands that do not depend on anything, therefore the statements contains no "ifs" such as "I ought to be kind to people." ...read more.


The second fundamental principle of the categorical imperative is the formula of end in itself- to treat humanity always as an end rather than solely as a means. By this Kant means that people should not be exploited for selfish gain, as people are rational and independent beings. If we fail to do this we treat ourselves as if we are superior to others. Therefore to be moral we need to value everyone equally. The third formula, the "formula of a kingdom of ends" develops this idea to suggest that everyone should act as if every other person was an "end", a free, self-ruling agent. We ought to act only by maxims which would harmonize with a possible kingdom of ends, as it is our duty not to act by maxims that are incoherent when we attempt to universalize them. By suggesting that individuals are independent and autonomous, however, Kant does not mean to suggest that everyone can decide on their own morality, but that everyone has the ability to use their pure practical reason to know what is right. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sarah Johnson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    One of the first major challenges to Kant's reasoning came from a Swiss philosopher, Benjamin Constant. He said that since truth telling must be universal according to Kant's theory, one must (if asked) tell a known murderer the location of his prey.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    Synthetic statements are the opposite of analytic statements. They are synthetic in the sense that the truth or falsehood of the statement can only be established by reference to further information. They have to be confirmed through some kind of experience.

  1. Austin's theory of law is based on coercio

    and secondly, that individual or body is not, itself in a habit of obedience to a determinate human superior. In response to Austin's definition it should be noted that, in the context of international law, the authority is not coming from the force of a sovereign power but from the state agreements or customary practices.

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Autonomous and Heteronomous Will It is clear why Kant makes much of the will - the part of the mind which gives impetus to our actions. The truly rational and truly free will is to be distinguished from the rationally constrained and morally fettered will.

  1. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    Going back to the Holocaust example, it seems difficult for us to accept that such terrible atrocities as those which were committed can be debated from two simple contrasting attitudes: "the Holocaust-Boo!" or "the Holocaust-Hurrah!". Given the many complex layers of meaning which regulate human behaviour and moral standards, this elementary theory seems totally ludicrous.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    year, there was what seemed to be decisive action on the part of President Clinton. He assembled a group of scientists, theologians and other experts to form the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) to examine the ethics of cloning. Clinton allotted ninety days for the a NBAC to "undertake a

  1. Kant's Theory of Universal Law

    is in itself morally wrong; therefore, it cannot be permissible under any circumstances. Explained by way of logic, it is wrong because, given the hypothetical, if everyone were to lie, then truth-- that which is exploited-- would be eradicated. Should that which is exploited be eradicated, then the perceived purpose in the exploitation is as well.

  2. In what sense (if any) was Machiavelli's approach to politics 'scientific' rather than 'moral'?

    found his state in that made it essential to find a solution that was practical rather than moral. It could be said that in trying to find a scientific solution to the problems of creating a strong leadership in Italy he was led by his moral views of nationalism and the power of man's will over gods.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work