• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's ethical theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Give an account of Kant's ethical theory Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth century German philosopher whose moral views continue to be influential. His ethical theory is based on a deontological point of view, where the act itself has moral value regardless of the consequences. Kant dismisses emotions such as pity and compassion as irrelevant to morality and thought that making a choice based on feelings or fulfilling our desires is irrelevant when making a morally correct decision. His beliefs oppose that of moral relativism, in which a morally good act is entirely dependant on the circumstances or culture in which it takes place, instead believing in the necessity of a perfectly universalisable moral law. A significant area of ethical study for Kant was the investigation into human reasoning. His views were in response to that of the empiricists and rationalists. The rationalists attempted to prove that we can understand the world purely be using our reasoning, on the other hand empiricists argued that all of our knowledge originates from experience. ...read more.

Middle

Duty is what the good will aims to fulfil. It is important that duty is done for its own sake and not to bring pleasure of happiness to yourself of others. For example, it is your duty to help those less fortunate than yourself by giving to charity, but you should not do so just to feel good about yourself. It is only moral if you act purely out of duty and are not guided only by emotions. The categorical imperative is also a crucial part of Kant's ethical theory. The categorical imperative differs from a hypothetical imperative in that acting according to a hypothetical imperative is only to achieve a particular goal. For example, "if I want to be liked I ought to be kind to people". A categorical imperative, however, contains no reference to other ends; they are moral commands that do not depend on anything, therefore the statements contains no "ifs" such as "I ought to be kind to people." ...read more.

Conclusion

The second fundamental principle of the categorical imperative is the formula of end in itself- to treat humanity always as an end rather than solely as a means. By this Kant means that people should not be exploited for selfish gain, as people are rational and independent beings. If we fail to do this we treat ourselves as if we are superior to others. Therefore to be moral we need to value everyone equally. The third formula, the "formula of a kingdom of ends" develops this idea to suggest that everyone should act as if every other person was an "end", a free, self-ruling agent. We ought to act only by maxims which would harmonize with a possible kingdom of ends, as it is our duty not to act by maxims that are incoherent when we attempt to universalize them. By suggesting that individuals are independent and autonomous, however, Kant does not mean to suggest that everyone can decide on their own morality, but that everyone has the ability to use their pure practical reason to know what is right. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sarah Johnson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Although Kant rejected arguments for the existence of God, his ethical theory assumes immorality of God's existence. Kant believed that the after life and God exist to provide an opportunity for reaching this supreme good, so it could be said that for Kant, morality led to God.

  2. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    This is where few would hold to be obligatory . The other problem is that a rule can be so precisely defined that it only benefits one individual. These points show us that the ability of the rule to be universalised does not itself guarantee that the rule will be morally good or even moral at all.

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    If a statement cannot be shown to be either true or false then it is a meaningless statement. For logical positivists, there are three types of statement: Analytic, Synthetic or Meaningless. Analytic statements are statements that can be established to be either true or false by analysing their constituent parts.

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    This is an interesting version and emphasises two facts: (a) we ought all to regard ourselves as members of one community (universal kingdom), and (b) that all members of that community are deserving of respect as autonomous, rational and free individuals (ends in themselves).

  1. Kant's Theory of Universal Law

    "I will lie to the Gestapo in order to preserve the life of a Jewish family." Clearly, this is far too specific to become universal; thus arises the maxim "It is permissible to lie to save the lives of others."

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    This concept seems illogical and highly improbable. Morality is not simply about emotions or the way we feel about something; it can be debated rationally. By using human reasoning and recognition we do have verifiable evidence that some situations and experiences are more positive or beneficial than others.

  1. Austin's theory of law is based on coercio

    Following this notion it is clear that duties are more fundamental than rights. This is because command and duty are correlative terms and therefore a duty arises as the consequence of being addressed by an enforceable command. In contrast rights are derivative from duties and arise because it presupposes a duty in someone else.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    To choose moral principles via the authority of reflection recognizing moral identity, one has to look for laws that he can will to be laws, and therefore has the feature of universality. Autonomous lawmaking must be universal. The agent, as unequivocally the author of the law, is autonomous and can endorse and reject.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work