• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's ethical theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Give an account of Kant's ethical theory Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth century German philosopher whose moral views continue to be influential. His ethical theory is based on a deontological point of view, where the act itself has moral value regardless of the consequences. Kant dismisses emotions such as pity and compassion as irrelevant to morality and thought that making a choice based on feelings or fulfilling our desires is irrelevant when making a morally correct decision. His beliefs oppose that of moral relativism, in which a morally good act is entirely dependant on the circumstances or culture in which it takes place, instead believing in the necessity of a perfectly universalisable moral law. A significant area of ethical study for Kant was the investigation into human reasoning. His views were in response to that of the empiricists and rationalists. The rationalists attempted to prove that we can understand the world purely be using our reasoning, on the other hand empiricists argued that all of our knowledge originates from experience. ...read more.

Middle

Duty is what the good will aims to fulfil. It is important that duty is done for its own sake and not to bring pleasure of happiness to yourself of others. For example, it is your duty to help those less fortunate than yourself by giving to charity, but you should not do so just to feel good about yourself. It is only moral if you act purely out of duty and are not guided only by emotions. The categorical imperative is also a crucial part of Kant's ethical theory. The categorical imperative differs from a hypothetical imperative in that acting according to a hypothetical imperative is only to achieve a particular goal. For example, "if I want to be liked I ought to be kind to people". A categorical imperative, however, contains no reference to other ends; they are moral commands that do not depend on anything, therefore the statements contains no "ifs" such as "I ought to be kind to people." ...read more.

Conclusion

The second fundamental principle of the categorical imperative is the formula of end in itself- to treat humanity always as an end rather than solely as a means. By this Kant means that people should not be exploited for selfish gain, as people are rational and independent beings. If we fail to do this we treat ourselves as if we are superior to others. Therefore to be moral we need to value everyone equally. The third formula, the "formula of a kingdom of ends" develops this idea to suggest that everyone should act as if every other person was an "end", a free, self-ruling agent. We ought to act only by maxims which would harmonize with a possible kingdom of ends, as it is our duty not to act by maxims that are incoherent when we attempt to universalize them. By suggesting that individuals are independent and autonomous, however, Kant does not mean to suggest that everyone can decide on their own morality, but that everyone has the ability to use their pure practical reason to know what is right. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sarah Johnson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Although Kant rejected arguments for the existence of God, his ethical theory assumes immorality of God's existence. Kant believed that the after life and God exist to provide an opportunity for reaching this supreme good, so it could be said that for Kant, morality led to God.

  2. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    This is where few would hold to be obligatory . The other problem is that a rule can be so precisely defined that it only benefits one individual. These points show us that the ability of the rule to be universalised does not itself guarantee that the rule will be morally good or even moral at all.

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Two things need to be said. Firstly, it will be obvious that Frank is working from a hypothetical imperative and that Fred is working from a categorical imperative. Secondly, it will be equally obvious that Fred's motive is derived from an autonomous will, whereas Frank's motive is derived from a heteronomous will.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    It is difficult, even on a personal level, to come to grips with what the idea of cloning, and in what many call the postmodern era, it is rare that one universal truth can be found. As such, it is the responsibility of the individual to seriously consider the options

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    If a statement cannot be shown to be either true or false then it is a meaningless statement. For logical positivists, there are three types of statement: Analytic, Synthetic or Meaningless. Analytic statements are statements that can be established to be either true or false by analysing their constituent parts.

  2. Austin's theory of law is based on coercio

    In any event it is submitted that a "command" model seems to fit some aspects of law poorly (e.g., rules which grant powers to officials and to private citizens-of the latter, the rules for making wills, trusts, and contracts are examples), while excluding other matters (e.g., international law)

  1. Describe Kant’s theory of Duty as the basis of morality (33 marks).

    We cannot be for example honest as long as it pleases us to do so. Kant therefore concludes that 'this will fails to be good will, just as if they had acted from self-interest. So far Kant has told us that a morally good person is a 'man of good

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    This concept seems illogical and highly improbable. Morality is not simply about emotions or the way we feel about something; it can be debated rationally. By using human reasoning and recognition we do have verifiable evidence that some situations and experiences are more positive or beneficial than others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work