• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality. (33) Kant (1724-1804) lived a totally uneventful life in Kļæ½nigsberg, East Prussia and was a key figure in the European Enlightenment. He was influenced by the scientist known for discovering gravity, Isaac Newton. Kant viewed the universe in a very mechanistic way, i.e., things operated according to fixed rules and emphasised the pre-eminence of reason as an authority for knowledge. It was this emphasis on reason that lead him towards his deontological theory, therefore he was concerned with the actions, not the consequences. Kant's theory is deontological because it's based on duty. To act morally is to do one's duty, and one's duty is to obey the moral law. Kant believed that we should not be influenced by feeling and inclination, we should not act out of love or compassion but only out of duty. He also believed that it isn't out duty to do thing were unable to do. For Kant, the pure fact the we ought to do something implies that it is actually possible. Moral statements are said to be prescriptive, they prescribe an action. An 'ought' implies a 'can'. ...read more.

Middle

The statement is also a priori which means that its truth is known independent of experience, we do not have to undertake a survey to determine that 'all spinsters are females are true'. A statement is synthetic if the predicate is not included in the subject and therefore it firstly tells us something about the subject which we wouldn't not otherwise know and secondly it may or may not be true. For instance, 'all bachelors are happy'. This statement is also a posteriori because it is based on experience, in other words we would have to undertake a survey of bachelors to decide whether it is true. Kant argued that all moral concepts have their origin a priori. Almost every statement is either a priori analytic or a posteriori synthetic, but Kant considered that statements about the moral law ere very unusual in that they were a priori synthetic. In other words, they were a priori (independent of experience) but they were also, synthetic not analytically or necessarily true). This placed Kant in direct opposition to utilitarians, who consider the consequences of an action (experience) as fundamental in deciding what is moral. If a murderer asked us whether our friend, who he was pursuing, was hiding in our house, Kant would insist we were honest. ...read more.

Conclusion

I may act out of kindness, generosity or compassion, but in these circumstances, the act confers virtue on me. Even if duty demanded the same action, but it was done for a motive, such compassion, then my act may be good but I'm not virtuous for doing it. If I give money to a beggar because duty demands it, then I'm virtuous for doing so. This makes Kant seem rather strict and uninterested in human emotions. In fact, he argued that duty and reason can help to guide our emotions, so that we aren't rules by them. A butcher acts with a good will if he charges his customers a fair price because it is right to do so, not because he knows they will go elsewhere if he doesn't. A moral person must be a rational being. Being good means having a good will. A good will is when I do my duty for the sake of duty alone. I do my duty because it's right, and for no other reason. Kant is described as having produced a system of ethics based on reason and not intuition, as he wished to establish a similarly regular and predictable basis for ethical decision making, and used reason because it is innate in every one and when properly applies, it reaches the same conclusions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Char Ayoub ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    His condition is polycystic kidney disease, a genetic disorder. His father died of the same illness at 44, before dialysis or transplants were available. He and his wife know that the disease is transmissible to and through their children, but they insist on keeping the facts from their children because it might frighten them and inhibit their social life and courtship hopes.

  2. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    Hence, for example, a deontologist cannot lie even when the lie would prevent the loss of several innocent lives. Deontology constraints or laws are always formulated as negatives: 'do not' rather than 'do'. These constraints start to define what is obligatory or what constitutes our duty.

  1. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    It is therefore our duty to act without selfishness with out any specific goals or aims. We do our duty because it is our duty- not for any other reason. This poses a problem to many philosophers, as the idea is difficult to carry out.

  2. Religion and Morality

    According to Dawkins this emphasizes the serious disrespect for women in an intensely religious culture. B) To what extent is one of these claims more convincing than the other Going back to the basics of the Divine Command Theory, there are 613 commands in the Bible which were originally in

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    For example, to determine whether 'Tuesday was a wet day' I would have had to experience the fact myself or have known someone else who experienced the weather on Tuesday or searched through some empirical evidence, namely the meteorological records for that Tuesday.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    Prescriptive realists are of the view that humanitarian intervention is possible, but that it is not justifiable, as humanitarian reasons are not legitimate reasons for intervention. Given the costs of military intervention, the state should only use military force when it is required to further its own vital national interest.

  1. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    Hume wrote about the ?illogical copulations of propositions? used in ethical statements. This is based on the idea that our observation of what people are like or what is ?naturally good? gives a clear indication of how people ought to behave.

  2. Explain what Kant means by 'summum bonum'

    Kant also argues that a ?second element? of ?summum bonum? exists as ?happiness proportionate to morality?. Here we can see that Kant assumes that the world is fair. As aforementioned, however, Kant has made it clear that achieving happiness should not be the reason/ motivation for people to act morally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work