• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality. (33) Kant (1724-1804) lived a totally uneventful life in Kļæ½nigsberg, East Prussia and was a key figure in the European Enlightenment. He was influenced by the scientist known for discovering gravity, Isaac Newton. Kant viewed the universe in a very mechanistic way, i.e., things operated according to fixed rules and emphasised the pre-eminence of reason as an authority for knowledge. It was this emphasis on reason that lead him towards his deontological theory, therefore he was concerned with the actions, not the consequences. Kant's theory is deontological because it's based on duty. To act morally is to do one's duty, and one's duty is to obey the moral law. Kant believed that we should not be influenced by feeling and inclination, we should not act out of love or compassion but only out of duty. He also believed that it isn't out duty to do thing were unable to do. For Kant, the pure fact the we ought to do something implies that it is actually possible. Moral statements are said to be prescriptive, they prescribe an action. An 'ought' implies a 'can'. ...read more.

Middle

The statement is also a priori which means that its truth is known independent of experience, we do not have to undertake a survey to determine that 'all spinsters are females are true'. A statement is synthetic if the predicate is not included in the subject and therefore it firstly tells us something about the subject which we wouldn't not otherwise know and secondly it may or may not be true. For instance, 'all bachelors are happy'. This statement is also a posteriori because it is based on experience, in other words we would have to undertake a survey of bachelors to decide whether it is true. Kant argued that all moral concepts have their origin a priori. Almost every statement is either a priori analytic or a posteriori synthetic, but Kant considered that statements about the moral law ere very unusual in that they were a priori synthetic. In other words, they were a priori (independent of experience) but they were also, synthetic not analytically or necessarily true). This placed Kant in direct opposition to utilitarians, who consider the consequences of an action (experience) as fundamental in deciding what is moral. If a murderer asked us whether our friend, who he was pursuing, was hiding in our house, Kant would insist we were honest. ...read more.

Conclusion

I may act out of kindness, generosity or compassion, but in these circumstances, the act confers virtue on me. Even if duty demanded the same action, but it was done for a motive, such compassion, then my act may be good but I'm not virtuous for doing it. If I give money to a beggar because duty demands it, then I'm virtuous for doing so. This makes Kant seem rather strict and uninterested in human emotions. In fact, he argued that duty and reason can help to guide our emotions, so that we aren't rules by them. A butcher acts with a good will if he charges his customers a fair price because it is right to do so, not because he knows they will go elsewhere if he doesn't. A moral person must be a rational being. Being good means having a good will. A good will is when I do my duty for the sake of duty alone. I do my duty because it's right, and for no other reason. Kant is described as having produced a system of ethics based on reason and not intuition, as he wished to establish a similarly regular and predictable basis for ethical decision making, and used reason because it is innate in every one and when properly applies, it reaches the same conclusions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Char Ayoub ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    A's attitude towards euthanasia is going to be affected by his attitudes towards these associated doctrines. Each of these may conflict to some degree with another set of doctrines or theories held by B. Therefore, B's attitude towards euthanasia will be different to A's.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    The doctrine of cultural relativism "implies the inapplicability of moral judgments to beyond one's own culture."4 It argues that moral standards are relative to communities, and that there are no universal objective moral standards, that the standards are only applicable to these cultures.

  1. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    It is therefore our duty to act without selfishness with out any specific goals or aims. We do our duty because it is our duty- not for any other reason. This poses a problem to many philosophers, as the idea is difficult to carry out.

  2. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    Obedience to these constrains is totally inflexible. A deontologist will maintain that we are not permitted to violate a rule or constraint even if serious harm will otherwise occur. No-one can be favoured and the preservations of another's life is less important than the preservation of out own virtue.

  1. What is the task of Kant's groundwork of the metaphysic of morals supposed to ...

    In fact, any coherent account of how we perform even the most rudimentary mental acts of self-awareness and making judgments about objects must presuppose these claims, Kant argues. The Rationalists, principally Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz, approached the problems of human knowledge from another angle.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    embryos, and fetuses human -a result that most SL proponents want from their theory. For there is no question that the fetus of a human mother is zoologically a member of our species. However if SL proponents do take this view, then they must explain why zoology makes a moral difference.

  1. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    essential human nature which makes a man a man.? He cites the example of the Inuit community who believe it is acceptable to kill an elderly member of the community if they know they will not survive the winter. Another criticism which makes the theory impractical is the point that it is a Naturalistic Fallacy.

  2. Explain what Kant means by 'summum bonum'

    He believes that any ?selfish interest? will not help people reach moral perfection. Kant, however, also realizes that we as humans cannot ensure that happiness is added to virtue. On our own, we cannot ensure that we get what we deserve for our efforts even though we can strive towards

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work