• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality. (33) Kant (1724-1804) lived a totally uneventful life in Kļæ½nigsberg, East Prussia and was a key figure in the European Enlightenment. He was influenced by the scientist known for discovering gravity, Isaac Newton. Kant viewed the universe in a very mechanistic way, i.e., things operated according to fixed rules and emphasised the pre-eminence of reason as an authority for knowledge. It was this emphasis on reason that lead him towards his deontological theory, therefore he was concerned with the actions, not the consequences. Kant's theory is deontological because it's based on duty. To act morally is to do one's duty, and one's duty is to obey the moral law. Kant believed that we should not be influenced by feeling and inclination, we should not act out of love or compassion but only out of duty. He also believed that it isn't out duty to do thing were unable to do. For Kant, the pure fact the we ought to do something implies that it is actually possible. Moral statements are said to be prescriptive, they prescribe an action. An 'ought' implies a 'can'. ...read more.

Middle

The statement is also a priori which means that its truth is known independent of experience, we do not have to undertake a survey to determine that 'all spinsters are females are true'. A statement is synthetic if the predicate is not included in the subject and therefore it firstly tells us something about the subject which we wouldn't not otherwise know and secondly it may or may not be true. For instance, 'all bachelors are happy'. This statement is also a posteriori because it is based on experience, in other words we would have to undertake a survey of bachelors to decide whether it is true. Kant argued that all moral concepts have their origin a priori. Almost every statement is either a priori analytic or a posteriori synthetic, but Kant considered that statements about the moral law ere very unusual in that they were a priori synthetic. In other words, they were a priori (independent of experience) but they were also, synthetic not analytically or necessarily true). This placed Kant in direct opposition to utilitarians, who consider the consequences of an action (experience) as fundamental in deciding what is moral. If a murderer asked us whether our friend, who he was pursuing, was hiding in our house, Kant would insist we were honest. ...read more.

Conclusion

I may act out of kindness, generosity or compassion, but in these circumstances, the act confers virtue on me. Even if duty demanded the same action, but it was done for a motive, such compassion, then my act may be good but I'm not virtuous for doing it. If I give money to a beggar because duty demands it, then I'm virtuous for doing so. This makes Kant seem rather strict and uninterested in human emotions. In fact, he argued that duty and reason can help to guide our emotions, so that we aren't rules by them. A butcher acts with a good will if he charges his customers a fair price because it is right to do so, not because he knows they will go elsewhere if he doesn't. A moral person must be a rational being. Being good means having a good will. A good will is when I do my duty for the sake of duty alone. I do my duty because it's right, and for no other reason. Kant is described as having produced a system of ethics based on reason and not intuition, as he wished to establish a similarly regular and predictable basis for ethical decision making, and used reason because it is innate in every one and when properly applies, it reaches the same conclusions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Char Ayoub ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    This view is linked to the last feature, the fact that the logical positivist's methods of verification are inadequate when it comes to talking about moral beliefs. All moral statements contain words or phrases that have a cognitive meaning as well as an emotive meaning.

  2. Austin's theory of law is based on coercio

    In any event it is submitted that a "command" model seems to fit some aspects of law poorly (e.g., rules which grant powers to officials and to private citizens-of the latter, the rules for making wills, trusts, and contracts are examples), while excluding other matters (e.g., international law)

  1. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    Hence, for example, a deontologist cannot lie even when the lie would prevent the loss of several innocent lives. Deontology constraints or laws are always formulated as negatives: 'do not' rather than 'do'. These constraints start to define what is obligatory or what constitutes our duty.

  2. utilitarianism and kant

    With utilitarianism it is not just personal happiness or self interest that counts, but the happiness and interest of everyone concerned. The basic principle of utilitarianism is 'an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number'.

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    that of Kosovo, it is not necessarily simply because of one culture imposing its views on another culture. It is very difficult to prove what is part of one culture and not of another, or indeed part of any culture at all.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    It is therefore our duty to act without selfishness with out any specific goals or aims. We do our duty because it is our duty- not for any other reason. This poses a problem to many philosophers, as the idea is difficult to carry out.

  1. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    For example; a women may choose to achieve success in her work rather than become a mother and reproduce and not follow this primary precept. Her life is surely not more immoral? This shows that the theory fails to be practical when there are specific moral injunctions which conflict with the more general principles.

  2. Critically discuss Nietzsches idea that his new morality would be beyond good and evil.

    None of these men created anything ?great?: Pol Pot issued a ?Year Zero? policy which meant the destruction of society so as to ?start again?, Hitler had millions of Jews and political prisoners exterminated and Stalin did much the same in his gulags.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work