• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Moral Relativism

Extracts from this document...


A) Explain moral relativism Relativism is the belief that there are no objective truths. Societies and individuals hold their own understanding what is right and what is wrong. There are two forms of relativism, subjective relativism and cultural relativism. Subjective relativism is the idea that each individual has the ability to develop their own moral choices and then relate their version of morality to a group who share their ideals. Cultural relativism is the belief that morality is developed within social groups, Roman Catholics for example are members of a social group that have moral relative opinions that they share. There are four different types of Cultural relativism. The diversity thesis, dependency thesis, conventionalism and pyramid relativism. A society cut off from other human existence would over time produce their own moral laws, these laws would apply to their society only, other societies would have developed their own personal moral laws that are relevant to themselves.. This is the diversity thesis. An example of this is the Yanomami tribe who survive the Amazon rainforest, they have developed their own relativist laws, for example as a result of having very little human contact up until very recently there is no recognized leader, there is equality amongst the population. ...read more.


ideology we cannot judge the morality of Iranian culture, as different cultures create differing moral laws, and we cannot be objective about another culture as we ourselves are products of our own culture. In Galeano?s ?Open Veins of Latin America? he speaks how Spanish explorers in the medieval centuries violated traditional Latin American customs, therefore believing that their moral laws are what are correct only. This is going against the dependency thesis. Conventionalism is the belief that moral rules come around when needed, not on a set of pre written values, but on reactions to particular and often immediate circumstances. Conventionalism recognizes the importance of the social environment in generating moral customs and beliefs. For example different societies will have differing moral codes on technology, it is against the law to hack into certain websites and databases, because it was not existent and therefore not a problem in the past. As time goes on and problems have been recognized, then moral codes can be written. Pyramid relativism is catalyst to the principle that in all societies and cultures , the individuals grow fundamental principles that instruct their moral laws. ...read more.


Subjective relativism relies on the individual obeying there own personal moral codes that they have set forth for themselves, hypocrisy is a way of judging an individuals subjective relativist beliefs. The philosopher Richard Rorty said that it is possible for individuals to live in societies within societies, for example when you go to work you will have a close knit group of friends who you act differently with than you other colleagues. People have the ability to vary their moral norms depending on their ?micro-society?. No set of moral values is necessarily better than the other, they are just different. As long as the individual is realizing that they are changing their morality as they go from micro-society to micro-society then they are not being hypocritical. To conclude, moral relativism is a broad term used to describe a multitude of differing reasonings of morality. From cultural to subjective, relativism is the general belief that there is no fixed universal moral codes, unlike absolutism. Opinion, society and the individual cause an individual to have their own personal set of moral values, to which they make important decisions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism

    Moral relativism is the position that there is no universal truth. All principles are relative to a particular culture or age. Time, culture, peers, religion, place and society may influence morality. This is a teleogical or consequentialist approach. Consequentialism is the idea that moral decisions are based on results or consequences.

  2. Absolutism and Relativism

    up, whereas in a Western country it is right for women to expose themselves more. Relativists think that whereas one person may have one view on a situation, another person might have another view, and although their views are different, they are both right and neither are wrong.

  1. Explain the features of moral relativism.

    relativist would look at the situation subjectively and come to the conclusion that all benefit from this decision and so it must be 'right'. Relativism includes the characteristics that are used in moral relativism. It states that all perceptions of situations are different and what is true for one person

  2. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    This shows contradicting views of one person, which as a result immediately creates confusion. Society is unclear on feelings towards homosexual couples, and due to mixed opinions, division and opposition remains in place. A more violent case of opposition towards homosexual couples was shown in 1999, when nail bombing took place in a gay bar in Soho, central London.

  1. Should capital punishment be reinstated?

    Life imprisonment, to a certain extent, is better as it prevents the person from escaping the reality of what they have down and, therefore, is caused to suffer. If a criminal was to be killed they would not have to live with what they have done.

  2. To what extent do we have an individual moral responsibility to the environment

    The opposing view is deep ecology, which is an approach that believes that all life forms have intrinsic value and the theory rejects anthropocentric viewpoints. Leopold believes that humans shouldn?t see themselves as the ?dominators? of the land and should exist as part of a moral community with animals and plants.

  1. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    The idea of God telling us what is moral is called the Divine Command Theory. However, there are some problems with getting your commands from God. This problem is known as the Euthyphro Dilemma. The Dilemma is that if you believe that things are moral because God says that they

  2. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    approach and perspective to Haag in terms of the death penalty and its application. Haag states that unequal justice is still justice and that equality before the law should be enforced but never at the expense of justice. Bedau offers a different perspective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work