• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Explain Plato's Analogy of the Cave" and Platos Theory of Forms tells us little about reality Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Explain Plato?s analogy of the cave. Plato believed in absolute morality, meaning he believes in things that are inherently right or wrong, which do not depend on the circumstances of the situation. He believed that the reason people know what is right and wrong is because of an alternate realm of the universe where ?Forms? exist. This idea is known as dualism. He believes that in the World of the Forms things are unchanging and eternal, and are perfect. We live in the World of Appearances which is the exact opposite. This explains why we all can recognise when things are beautiful, for example. He believed that humans had an immortal soul that had in a past life experienced ?The Form of the Beautiful? and therefore we recognise this in nature and in other people. Because we were born with this knowledge it is innate in all of us. He believed in a ?Form of the Good? which is where our sense of morality comes from. To explain his beliefs to people, Plato used analogies. ...read more.

Middle

The idea that people may murder those who try to show them the truth may reflect Plato?s views about the death of Socrates, who was his mentor. Socrates was killed by the Greek government for expressing his opinions and it is clear through this story that Plato disagrees with this and believes Socrates was noble for trying to educate those who didn?t want to be educated. Plato also expressed the idea that only those who truly understood the Form of the Good and did who so were not influenced by the world of Appearances are philosophers and that they should be the ones who ruled Greece, as only they could truly understand what was right and wrong, this is known as the argument for ?Philosopher Kings.? Plato said that ?Making political decisions requires judgement and skill? and believed that only philosophers had those powers. 1. ?Plato?s Theory of Forms tells us little about reality? Discuss Plato?s World of the Forms is a separate realm to reality, or as he puts it ?The World of Appearances? and is the exact opposite of our reality, so some would argue that it tells us little about reality because it?s not supposed to. ...read more.

Conclusion

Ayer?s verification principle states that something has to be able to be reproduced and proved with evidence and he believed that religious language was unverifiable and therefore was nonsense and irrelevant to us. However most people do seem to have a conscience that agrees on certain things e.g rape is wrong and so Plato?s theory does explain why that might be. Many arguments against Plato?s Theory of Forms may also be arguments against religion, as Plato?s Form of the Good is very similar to an idea of God found in monotheistic religions, as it is the source of morality and exists outside of our universe, however there are obvious differences, for example, Plato?s Form of the Good did not create the universe. In conclusion, I agree with the idea that Plato?s theory of the forms tells us little about reality because I don?t believe that it can be applied to reality. This is because the idea of the World of the Forms is in itself separate from our reality. However, I believe it is a useful idea in terms of where our morality comes from, but I am more convinced by other ideas, such asour own conscience and the influence of the society we grow up in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    We can only have inexact conceptions of things we perceive with our senses. But we can have true knowledge of things we understand with out reason. When it came to the theory of knowledge, Aristotle believed in three categories; sensation, thought and desire.

  2. Free essay

    Discuss Plato's Theory of Forms

    In the allegory we find prisoners chained in a cave, unable to turn their heads. Behind them burns a fire and between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised pathway, along which men holding puppets walk. The puppets cast shadows on the wall of the cave that lies in front of the prisoners.

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    square or a triangle only to the extent that it resembles ("participates in" is Plato's phrase) the Form "circularity" or "squareness" or "triangularity" in the real world. However, there then comes the question, how do we know what is perfect, or what a circle is and what it should look like?

  2. Explain Plato's allegory of the cave

    try to extend themselves as well as an example of how critical people can be to new ideas.

  1. Explain Plato's theory of forms.

    To seek reason and understanding and to grasp real knowledge and the "Form of the good" "Plato's theory of forms is of little use in understanding the physical world" Discuss Plato's theory of forms is of little use in our physical world due to the fact that people in this

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    A form, roundness, does not exist at any place or time. The forms exist, or subsist, in a different way. This is especially important because it explains why the forms are unchanging. A form such as roundness will never change; it does not even exist in time.

  1. Reductive physicalist accounts of the mind fail to fully explain the nature of mental ...

    This leaves the Behaviourists with the problem of linking one particular mental state to one particular behaviour; without first making assumptions about what other mental states that person has. Overall then, this leads to a threat of regress ? it seeming impossible for Behaviourists to define any one mental states until they have already defined lots of other mental states.

  2. Explain Platos analogy of the cave

    point is that the prisoners would be mistaken, as they would be taking the terms in their language to refer to the shadows that pass before their eyes, rather than (as is correct, in Plato?s view) to the real things that cast the shadows.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work