• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Plato's metaphor of shadows in the analogy of the cave.

Extracts from this document...


The Analogy of the Cave Luke Hodgkinson a) Explain Plato's metaphor of shadows in the analogy of the cave. In the analogy of the cave Plato puts forward the theory that a group of men (representing the vast majority of mankind) are captured at birth and chained in a cave, so they can only look at a wall. Behind them, the captors build a fire and then walk in front of the fire on a road running perpendicular within the cave so that shadows are cast on that wall. The captives can only see the shadows on the wall, for their heads are fastened so that they cannot turn around. The captors carry by various birds, animals and objects, making noises whilst doing this, and the prisoners think the shadows are making these sounds, and start giving names to the different shadows, believing they are the real objects, for they know nothing of the real objects. The captives compete with one another, and try to remember the order in which the shadows will appear, These shadows represent the illusion ...read more.


When his eyes are fully adjusted, he can see the world of forms in its full, and begin to understand it, using his intelligence. Finally, when he can stare directly into the sun, he will understand the true form of the good. Plato believed that our world as we knew it was based on forms, but what we saw were the shadows cast for us, and these shadows we see are the impermanent and changing particulars of the physical world, all based on the pure forms of the real world (the permanent world), which we are shielded from by the constraints placed upon us, and the blinding light that would deter us should we ever escape our constraints. However, according to Plato, we are perfectly content with the false world of change we are viewing on the back wall of the cave, as it is all we know about, and should we be freed, we would be utterly unwilling to be shown the real world, because of the uncertainties and the blinding light. ...read more.


He disregards the emotions and feelings of the masses. He fails to see the deeper side of those he regards as incapable of being helped, or ever escaping from their constraints, and holds a certain belief that their life is hardly worth living, under such false pretentions of reality. This could be seen as a rather elitist and arrogant point of view, but this is nothing if not expected of Greek philosophers, as they were the highest of the high in society, and regarded themselves even higher. Finally Plato's argument that man would sooner abandon reality and return back to the comfort of the physical world than accept, or believe the real world, is again a rather pessimistic view of the curiosity and desire for knowledge and understanding that we as humans must satiate. He seems to believe that we have no desire for knowledge whatsoever, and are not only content in our ignorance, but utterly intent on protecting it. For this I see him as overly pessimistic, and rather vainglorious. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    The three classes experience different upbringings, and receive different levels of education. Plato contradicts himself, he says that all people in the Kallipolis should be 'friends' and 'equals' yet he also unashamedly states that the Producers will not be able to choose how they wish to live their lives, and that their opinions are the least worthy.

  2. Explain Plato's use of the metaphor of the shadows in his Allegory of the ...

    There are many criticisms about Plato's understanding of human reason on quite a lot of grounds. In my opinion, the first and most important would be the abstractness of his theories, particularly the theory of Forms. It is clear that many may argue that Plato's idea of having a universe

  1. Explain Plato's use of the metaphor of the shadows in his analogy of the ...

    Therefore, how can we know what a flower really is, in its 'original' form? The simple answer is, we cannot. In reality, we can only say that we know they are all flowers because they have certain aspects of 'floweriness' in common, for example, leaves, petals etc.

  2. Explain Plato's use of the metaphor of shadows in his allegory of the cave.

    He believes that there are two worlds, the world of ideas (where we gain all knowledge and ideas of everything, from the perfect forms), and the natural world (where we recall everything we have learnt from the world of ideas).

  1. Plato used the analogy of the cave to criticise the unphilosophical and to 'get ...

    If the latter is the case then we are faced with Forms within a Form. A related problem is there could be an infinite regress of forms. For example, if you imagine you have a series of particular beds then you add the Form of the bed to this series

  2. Explain Platos teaching about reality in his analogy of the cave. (25 marks)

    Therefore we have innate knowledge of the ?ideal? dog that can be developed through rational thoughts that lead to the soul remembering these memories (this process is called anamnesis). Plato believed that the most important form was the form of good, which he said was the central existence of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work