• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making.

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making. [35] Situation Ethics is a teleological approach to decision making, meaning that it is concerned with the ethical implications of the end result of an action as opposed to the fundamental correctness of the action itself. In 1962 an American Protestant Christian Theologian called Professor Joseph Fletcher wrote a book called ?Situation Ethics?. Traditionally Christianity had been dominated by Natural Law thinking and in particular the view that certain actions were absolutely and always right or wrong, and Situation Ethics arose out of that background. Situationists claim that Jesus came to do away with a legalistic approach to religion. Situation Ethics is the name Fletcher gave to his system of moral thinking. Fletcher argued that it was pointless to try to look for moral laws which would cover every situation you could think of in life - life was far too complicated for that. The only absolute rule is that of love. It is not literally a ?rule? but an attitude or motive to help inform our moral choices. In any situation, a person must ask themselves what does love require them to do. ...read more.


Relativism does not imply that anything goes. To be relative one has to be relative to something and in the case of Situation Ethics it should be to love. We must always act lovingly - how this is to be applied will depend on the situation. This theory also takes a positivistic position believing that values are derived voluntarily, not rationally. A man decides on his values, he does not deduce them from nature. Situationists believe in the supremacy of love because faith claims that God is love. It is only in the norm of Christian love that other moral expressions find their justification. Finally, personalism implies that there are no inherently good things, only persons are inherently valuable. Value only ?happens? to things. This theory sees ethics as dealing with human relations. Situation Ethics puts people at the centre. The Legalists would ask what the law says whereas Situation Ethics asks how people can be helped. The Christian is committed to love people, not laws. This aspect of Situation Ethics appeals to liberal protestants. Situation Ethics opposed deductive methods of moral arguments ? also so called casuistry. ...read more.


Seen in this light, Situation Ethics will start from the belief that it is generally in our interests to create families, nurturing and educating our children. However, in exceptional circumstances the situation might demand a different, loving response. Abortion would be an exception in extreme circumstances, not a method of birth control (as it has become in some countries). The main challenge to situation ethics within Christendom comes from the Roman Catholic Church, who prefer Natural Law. For example, in the case of Jodie and Mary, conjoined twins, the Catholic Church wanted to let both of the girls die. To kill one, saving the other, would be an evil or bad act, they said. Fletcher would have disagreed. Letting both girls die is not pragmatic. It would be of more use, more practical, to save one girl at the expense of the other. Overall, what the situationist does have in advance is a general knowledge of what he should do (love), why he should do it (for God's sake), to whom it should be done (his neighbours). He knows that this love is altruistic, not egoistic and should be exercised towards as many neighbours as possible. To quote the Apostle Paul, ?Love does no wrong to a neighbour, therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    refuse to do it because it goes against what being a doctor is about, they should be saving lives not ending them. Others would argue that we couldn't legalise euthanasia because some doctors would look to lower costs and perhaps recommend or perform euthanasia unnecessarily.

  2. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    However, although this makes everyone equal, we don't necessarily value everyone's happiness equally. Within society, we logically value the happiness of an innocent child above that of a condemned murderer. Also, it is human nature to value the pleasure of those close to us more highly than that of strangers,

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    the world, and is in a constant state of development throughout life - from the oung child's simple understanding that that is 'naughty' to the teenager's proclamation that 'stealing is wrong as it hurts people'. You could argue Piaget is a moral relativist as he seems to value all of these logical systems of ethics.

  2. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    The problem with this deontological viewpoint however, is that sometimes one needs to consider the consequences of an action. If, for example, the torturing someone resulted in the prevention of a disaster such as September 11th 2001, one could argue that it was necessary to torture that one person to save the lives of thousands of others.

  1. Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

    For they may not lead a good quality of life due, but does this make them any less worthy of an organ? Peter Vardy argued that he could be a criminal but because he was young he in this case would receive the organ over someone who has had a

  2. Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

    As mentioned earlier, Fletcher was influenced by the New Testament, and used the example of Jesus as a prominent guideline throughout his theory. Jesus had argued with the Pharisees over their legalistic approach in the Gospel, and it is Jesus that Fletcher took influence from.

  1. Utilitarianism ethics is the not the best approach to environmental ethics discuss

    However for some issues it is hard to apply the principle of pleasure therefore is not the most practical approach to environmental ethics. An deontological approach, such as Kant maybe see as a more appropriate approach, as rather than being based on a subjective view it is absolute so universally

  2. 'Some religious ethics are too rigid for moral decision making. Discuss

    is put in the context of the Christian principle of live, charity and compassion hence in some rare cases when the mother?s mental or physical health is threatened, the rule can be broken. Traditional Christian ethics are therefore not too rigid for moral decisions making because the foundation of agape allows for the necessary flexibility in situations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work