• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the case for voluntary euthanasia.

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the case for voluntary euthanasia. [35] Euthanasia can be defined as, ?the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.? When considering euthanasia we must consider the difference between acts of commission and acts of omission. Acts of omission is when something is deliberately not done, e.g. not giving a blood transfusion and just perhaps leaving the person to die ? this would not be classified as euthanasia. The BMA (British Medical Association) recognises a distinction between withholding treatment that may become burdensome on the patient and deliberately bringing a person?s life to an end. Voluntary euthanasia is an act of commission; a positive, deliberate action e.g. administering tablets deliberately to bring death. There are many that would support assisted dying but not assisted suicide, although the two are closely linked. Assisted dying only applies to terminally ill, mentally competent adults and requires the dying patient, after meeting strict legal safeguards, to self administer life-ending medication. Assisted dying is legalised and regulated in the US States of Oregon and Washington. ...read more.


When considering euthanasia Preference Utilitarianists would consider the advantages of life rather than death, both for the persons concerned and for the family. When considering this issue Utilitarianists think about quality of life as well as quantity of life. Milan Kundera wrote, ?Dogs do not have many advantages over people, but one of them is extremely important: euthanasia is not forbidden by law in their case; animals have the right to a merciful death.? Furthermore, situation ethics could be used to support voluntary euthanasia. Quite simply, you can dispense with rules about killing, because the most loving thing to do may well be to give someone a peaceful death. Situation Ethics is Personal - it puts people before rules. It is also Pragmatic, allowing us to do whatever works best in the circumstances. What is the use in keeping someone alive to suffer? Relativism is at the heart of the theory. This means that in any situation, when faced with a difficult decision about whether to help someone to die, we need to act out of love, which means ignoring any hard and fast rule and doing what the situation requires. ...read more.


He did say that, if he were solely responsible, his mother might not continue to live. There are three main arguments in favour of voluntary euthanasia. Firstly, the autonomy argument, which argues that euthanasia is an issue of personal autonomy. Personal autonomy is the capacity to decide for oneself and pursue a course of action in one's life, often regardless of any particular moral content. It should be up to the individual to decide when they wish to die, and it should not be dictated by anyone else. John Stuart Mill commented, ?over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.? The second argument is the compassion argument, which is closely linked to both utilitarianism and situation ethics. This argues that we should allow the patient a dignified death and a release from their suffering. The final argument relates to public policy; if we make voluntary euthanasia legal, we will be able to control how it is performed. Overall, euthanasia is an extremely sensitive issue and all sides of the argument should treat those involved with the upmost compassion and respect. To quote Pamela Bone, ?I'm not afraid of being dead. I'm just afraid of what you might have to go through to get there.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    Once God has set life in motion, He can only bring it to an end. Christians who believe we must not allow life to become disposable for utilitarian reasons hold this view. RELIGION Different religions have varying views on the legalisation of euthanasia.

  2. Explain religious and ethical arguments in favour of Euthanasia

    say that in the case of the cancer patient, it would be more loving to allow them to

  1. Should euthanasia be legalised in the UK?

    They say regardless of circumstances also, I say that it just like ignoring a person life condition, which I believe in unfair. In the situation of a terminally ill person there is limited choices only. They can either carry on living in pain, travel to another country meaning high expenses

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    The same problem arises in a more intense form at the clinical level. For example, which patients in renal failure will share in the available slots of time on artificial kidneys or in the short supply of cadaver tissue? How are we to choose sides in the argument about whether to put hard drug addicts on methadone?

  1. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    For example, Kerrie Wooltorton drank bleach because she was suffering from depression this was due to the fact she could not have children. Having drunk the poison she telephoned for an ambulance but on arriving at the hospital she handed the doctors a letter which said that she wanted to be made comfortable, but then allowed to die.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    They speak as though the value of life were infinite and that no value whatsoever could override the value of life except possibly more life. Preventive Killing The question of preventive killing arises in many settings. It arose very sharply in the birth of hydrocephalic children prior to the development of antiseptic Caesarean sections.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work