• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of God from Aquinas and Copleston (25 marks)

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of God from Aquinas and Copleston (25 marks) Plan 1. ?Cosmo? means universe 2. Cause and effect 3. Thomas Aquinas- third century, his three ways 4. Frederick Copleston radio show in 1940s used his 4 steps 5. Aquinas first way- Motion, potential to actual 6. Second way- Cause and effect- first cause 7. Third way- contingency- world had a beginning, no infinite regress, had to be caused by necessary being 8. Copleston- 4 steps- contingency 9. God contains explanation for existence in himself The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument for the existence of God. ...read more.


He then goes on to say that nothing can be pushing itself into something else, there is always something before it. If we assume that the universe is contingent and doesn?t go back for infinity, then we can conclude that something must have started the first motion. Aquinas believed that this first, unmoved mover is who we call God. God pushes things from their original state, their actual state, to their potential state. They can?t move themselves. Aquinas? 2nd way says that everything must be caused. For example, our parents caused us, and their parents caused them etc. ...read more.


For the universe, this is God. Copleston put forward his idea of the cosmological argument in 4 main steps. Firstly, he says that things cannot exist of their own, they are brought about by other events. Secondly, he says that everything in the universe is like this, nothing holds its explanation in itself. Thirdly therefore, the universe cannot have been the cause of itself. Lastly, the cause of the universe must be some being which exists separately and holds its own explanation in itself. This necessary being is God. In conclusion, the cosmological argument tries to give proof of God?s existence by looking at causation and motion in the world. Aquinas and Copleston believed that there must be a first cause, and this is a necessary being who we call God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    to "There is a time for everything when it doesn't exist." This is not good reasoning. In general, you cannot argue from a sentence that begins "For all F's there is a G..." to another sentence beginning "There is a G for all F's...."

  2. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    may seem, if an infinite amount of time was had, it would happen. Although logical, Aquinas is detracting people from a possible argument for the existence of G-d by refusing to concede the possibility of infinite regression. David Hume also argued against Aquinas' argument.

  1. Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God

    be undermined because there would be no need for a first cause to trigger off all other causes. Infinite regression is the challenging of the first premise of the cosmological argument, that everything has a cause. Most scholars reject infinite regress, including Craig and Aquinas who said that actual infinite is illogical.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    A Priori arguments are also said to be deductive, as they make their conclusion from available information, therefore it is not necessary to have experience of the situation. The concept of actual infinity, in my opinion, is illogical; so to believe the Kalam argument for the existence of God, you need to understand and agree with this theory.

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    * FIRST CAUSE: - nature of efficient causes. In the world we find an order of efficient causes. There is no case where a thing is found to be its own efficient cause; it would have to exist before itself, which is impossible. Efficient causes cannot go to infinity because the first cause is the cause of the middle and the middle cause of the end cause.

  2. A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston.

    How valid do you think the Cosmological Argument is as proof for the existence of God? The cosmological argument is a classical argument for the existence of God. It is also referred to as the first cause argument. The cosmological argument concludes Gods existence from a posteriori premise.

  1. Explain the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, according to Aquinas

    The principle of movement must never change because otherwise everything would cease and stop. This similar to the scientific ideas that have been proven like the natural laws of physics if gravity ceased, matter would float and us humans wouldn?t function and die.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    not be explicitly obvious that it was indicating to the God of classical theism. We could posit another being there as its cause, as there is no evidence pointing to the God of classical theism. However it could be argued, that everything is a product of its context and Al-Ghazali

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work