• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of God from Aquinas and Copleston (25 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of God from Aquinas and Copleston (25 marks) Plan 1. ?Cosmo? means universe 2. Cause and effect 3. Thomas Aquinas- third century, his three ways 4. Frederick Copleston radio show in 1940s used his 4 steps 5. Aquinas first way- Motion, potential to actual 6. Second way- Cause and effect- first cause 7. Third way- contingency- world had a beginning, no infinite regress, had to be caused by necessary being 8. Copleston- 4 steps- contingency 9. God contains explanation for existence in himself The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument for the existence of God. ...read more.

Middle

He then goes on to say that nothing can be pushing itself into something else, there is always something before it. If we assume that the universe is contingent and doesn?t go back for infinity, then we can conclude that something must have started the first motion. Aquinas believed that this first, unmoved mover is who we call God. God pushes things from their original state, their actual state, to their potential state. They can?t move themselves. Aquinas? 2nd way says that everything must be caused. For example, our parents caused us, and their parents caused them etc. ...read more.

Conclusion

For the universe, this is God. Copleston put forward his idea of the cosmological argument in 4 main steps. Firstly, he says that things cannot exist of their own, they are brought about by other events. Secondly, he says that everything in the universe is like this, nothing holds its explanation in itself. Thirdly therefore, the universe cannot have been the cause of itself. Lastly, the cause of the universe must be some being which exists separately and holds its own explanation in itself. This necessary being is God. In conclusion, the cosmological argument tries to give proof of God?s existence by looking at causation and motion in the world. Aquinas and Copleston believed that there must be a first cause, and this is a necessary being who we call God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    to "There is a time for everything when it doesn't exist." This is not good reasoning. In general, you cannot argue from a sentence that begins "For all F's there is a G..." to another sentence beginning "There is a G for all F's...."

  2. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    It is impossible to imagine which shows the limitation of the imagination but not of things. If infinite regress exists, then in that amount of time anything could happen, for example someone trying to roll a dice to get a six one million times in a row, however unlikely it

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    * FIRST CAUSE: - nature of efficient causes. In the world we find an order of efficient causes. There is no case where a thing is found to be its own efficient cause; it would have to exist before itself, which is impossible. Efficient causes cannot go to infinity because the first cause is the cause of the middle and the middle cause of the end cause.

  2. Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God

    of nothing" [King Lear.] Their ideas influenced later scholars such as Sir Thomas Aquinas who published five ways which he believed proved the existence of God. The first of Aquinas' five ways is that of motion, in which he argues that nothing can move itself, yet things are in fact

  1. Augustine on creation and Aquinas on the existence of God.

    So, one cannot measure something that has happened, because once it is in the past, it no longer exists. Augustine accepts that their appears to be an irrational aspect of presentism, in that by accepting the present as the only form of time, one would then seemingly have to agree

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    is meaningless and absurd, if this is true then it would greatly undermine the argument. The most profound weakness is the ?Fallacy of composition?, which is the misconception of thinking that there is a property or predicate to each part of a given group, it must be logically follow that the whole group has the same properties or predicates.

  1. Explain the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, according to Aquinas

    Darwin?s evolution theory is an example primarily of progression, humans would cease if we didn?t evolve genetically to be the fittest to survive.

  2. Explain Paleys argument for the existence of God (25 Marks) The universe has no ...

    For this reason he suggested that elements of the universe fit together to meet a function. Paley asks us first to imagine what thoughts we would have if we came across a stone on a desert. He said that we would not think it strange that the rock was there,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work