• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Cosmological argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1) Explain the Cosmological argument for the existence of God.(25 marks) Thomas Aquinas built upon the idea of the Cosmological argument the most by attempting to answer the question " why is there a universe rather than nothing at all?" , Aquinas stated that " Nothing comes from nothing, the universe exists, so something must have made it, that can only be God" Aquinas developed his ideas based upon an idea the ancient Greeks used; like the ancient Greek arguments, Aquinas used the natural world and the senses to reason from , thus the Cosmological argument is a posterior ( based on reason and facts) as opposed to an a priori approach through assumptions. The origins of the cosmological arguments come from the ideas of the Greek philosophers Plato and his understudy Aristotle. Plato believed that there was a prime mover which was the ultimate source of change as it alone possessed the power to change both itself and others around it , this he called the idea of motion. Plato also believed that only souls could be primary movers and therefore that whatever causes the whole universe to move must be a soul, a wholly ultimate, intelligent primary mover. ...read more.

Middle

The first and second ways are named "motion" and "causation". Aquinas stated that the existence of the universe could not possibly have been around "forever" as there cannot be infinite regress of movers or causers as this would be absurd. Aquinas explains that such features as those in the world need an explanation beyond the chain of motion or causation; to explain features such as the world ,as infinite regress is an impossibility in Aquinas' view, the only explanation is that a causer or mover that does not fall under causation or motion rules must exist, therefore that the source of all chains of causation , is the starting push for all other events as it is responsible for its own existence , it is the "unmoved mover", namely God. An example of Aquinas' first and second ways is wood burning on a fire. Wood is in a state of change as it burns; as wood is a secondary mover it cannot just ignite and burn itself, it needs fire. If everything was a secondary mover, then there would be an infinite regress of movers; if there was an infinite regress of movers ...read more.

Conclusion

in the world was contingent, there would be nothing; if there was nothing then there would be no life now, - this is an absurd point to comprehend as we are existing right now- , therefore not everything is contingent and one ultimate non-contingent being is necessary. From this point Aquinas makes it clear that there can only be one ultimate being as an infinite regress of necessary beings (multiple Gods) would mean that they would be contingent. To conclude , the Cosmological argument is one that shows Aquinas believed that the explanation for the universe cannot be found within it but must be located in an external source or cause (which must be God). The Cosmological arguments claims God is a being of necessary existence similarly to the Ontological arguments, the difference however lies in that the Cosmological conclusion of God's existence is based on our experiences of the universe; inductive reasoning is the basis of the Cosmological argument and suggests that we can proceed from what we know of the universe, conclusions about what lies beyond our own experiences using his first three ways. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kate Verity Blueman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    William Temple argued "[...]It is impossible to imagine infinite regress [...] but it is not impossible to conceive it." He meant that something is unthinkable if we cannot hold the concept without contradiction. But infinite does not contradict regress; you can imagine infinity but not think of it, the world makes sense as a concept and can be understood.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    'When we look about us towards external objects, and consider the operation of causes, we are never able, in a single instance, to discover any power or necessary connection; any quality, which binds the effect to the cause, and renders the one an infallible consequence of the other.'39 For example, you through a switch the current flows.

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    Necessity and Contingency * There is no reason to assume that there need to have been a time when there was once nothing. There could be overlapping chains of contingent beings, so that there was never a period. There is no logical impossibility in this, there is no contradiction intrinsic to the concept of an endless chain of contingent beings.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    Plato and the Cosmological Argument). * How can God be an Uncaused Causer (or Unmoved Mover)? 'If God made everything, who made God?' There are also problems with the Kalam Cosmological argument, there are as follows: * A possible disagreement to the Kalam Cosmological Argument might be the Oscillating Universe Theory.

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    That there is a designer of the world is an inference, not a formally logical conclusion. Whether Paley's reasoning is sound depends on whether the world is sufficiently similar to a watch. Even before Paley wrote, Hume had denied that it is possible to draw an analogy between the world and a human artefact.

  2. Explain the features and origins of the Cosmological Argument

    For example, wood is potentially hot, and for a piece of wood to become hot it has to be changed by fire. Whatever is moved must be initially moved by another, which itself was once moved. If we trace back we must arrive at a first mover, moved by no other.

  1. Comapring Aristotle's Prime Mover and the Judeo-Christian God

    People who believe in a Judeo-Christian God are ruled by their beliefs and live their lives according to what they think is right and wrong in God?s view, whereas Aristotle?s Theory tells us nothing about how to live our lives, and only how the universe came to be.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    It is noteworthy to point out that the concept of causation has been criticised by philosophers such as Hume as a concept that is imposed upon the world by the human and does not exist in reality. The first premise of everything having a cause is challenged by quantum physics

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work