• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Cosmological argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1) Explain the Cosmological argument for the existence of God.(25 marks) Thomas Aquinas built upon the idea of the Cosmological argument the most by attempting to answer the question " why is there a universe rather than nothing at all?" , Aquinas stated that " Nothing comes from nothing, the universe exists, so something must have made it, that can only be God" Aquinas developed his ideas based upon an idea the ancient Greeks used; like the ancient Greek arguments, Aquinas used the natural world and the senses to reason from , thus the Cosmological argument is a posterior ( based on reason and facts) as opposed to an a priori approach through assumptions. The origins of the cosmological arguments come from the ideas of the Greek philosophers Plato and his understudy Aristotle. Plato believed that there was a prime mover which was the ultimate source of change as it alone possessed the power to change both itself and others around it , this he called the idea of motion. Plato also believed that only souls could be primary movers and therefore that whatever causes the whole universe to move must be a soul, a wholly ultimate, intelligent primary mover. ...read more.

Middle

The first and second ways are named "motion" and "causation". Aquinas stated that the existence of the universe could not possibly have been around "forever" as there cannot be infinite regress of movers or causers as this would be absurd. Aquinas explains that such features as those in the world need an explanation beyond the chain of motion or causation; to explain features such as the world ,as infinite regress is an impossibility in Aquinas' view, the only explanation is that a causer or mover that does not fall under causation or motion rules must exist, therefore that the source of all chains of causation , is the starting push for all other events as it is responsible for its own existence , it is the "unmoved mover", namely God. An example of Aquinas' first and second ways is wood burning on a fire. Wood is in a state of change as it burns; as wood is a secondary mover it cannot just ignite and burn itself, it needs fire. If everything was a secondary mover, then there would be an infinite regress of movers; if there was an infinite regress of movers ...read more.

Conclusion

in the world was contingent, there would be nothing; if there was nothing then there would be no life now, - this is an absurd point to comprehend as we are existing right now- , therefore not everything is contingent and one ultimate non-contingent being is necessary. From this point Aquinas makes it clear that there can only be one ultimate being as an infinite regress of necessary beings (multiple Gods) would mean that they would be contingent. To conclude , the Cosmological argument is one that shows Aquinas believed that the explanation for the universe cannot be found within it but must be located in an external source or cause (which must be God). The Cosmological arguments claims God is a being of necessary existence similarly to the Ontological arguments, the difference however lies in that the Cosmological conclusion of God's existence is based on our experiences of the universe; inductive reasoning is the basis of the Cosmological argument and suggests that we can proceed from what we know of the universe, conclusions about what lies beyond our own experiences using his first three ways. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kate Verity Blueman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God. Humes criticisms ...

    of logic and instead of moving from one step to the next makes a great leap. To move from 'everything we observe has a cause' to 'the universe has a cause' is too big a leap in logic. Hume also argued that we assume that there is a relationship between

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    'When we look about us towards external objects, and consider the operation of causes, we are never able, in a single instance, to discover any power or necessary connection; any quality, which binds the effect to the cause, and renders the one an infallible consequence of the other.'39 For example, you through a switch the current flows.

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Second, even if we do accept the premises the argument still fails because the greatest conceivable being could be a being that can be imagined to exist but does not currently exist. Finally, the main error with the argument is that the fact that we can imagine the greatest conceivable being does not prove that it cannot not exist.

  2. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    here, he is saying that if we broaden the perspective of understanding from experience, we can apply it to the Universe, to find what out what created it. This supports Thomas Aquinas by using a posterior experience to suggest that the universe and world were created by G-d.

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    Hume claims that causation is a habit of relationship. He notes that when we repeatedly observe one event following another, our assumption that we are witnessing cause and effect seems logical to us. Hume holds that we have a natural belief in causality, from our own natural habits, and that we can neither prove nor discount this belief.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    Empiricists would support this argument as it uses empirical data, which can be sensed and typically tested. This adds to the strength of the argument, as any experiment with evidence to support the hypothesis, is scientifically classed as reliable.

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    Furthermore cause usually has some purpose behind it; however we cannot seem to find a universal purpose that everyone accepts, as the purposes that religion gives are clearly not universal as only adherents of that religion have them. If the universe did have a purpose, would we not be able

  2. Explain the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, according to Aquinas

    to pull it so therefore the carriages are dependent on the necessary motion of that engine. Aquinas makes a 2nd inductive leap saying that a first unchanged changer or unmoved mover necessary existence is what we mean by God. The cosmological argument has been criticised and questioned by philosophers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work