• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the difference between Bentham and Mills forms of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Explain the difference between Bentham and Mill?s forms of utilitarianism Bentham started the theory of utilitarianism. He based his theory on pain and pleasure. He used hedonism- the maximising of pleasure and the minimising of pain, and the principle of utility- the greatest pleasure for the greatest number. In order to judge actions he came up with the hedonic calculus. Mill developed his theory but instead, he focused on happiness for everyone, each individual. Mill also believed in higher and lower pleasures. Bentham is usually associated with Act utilitarianism, Mill is associated with Rule utilitarianism. Bentham?s belief that an action is right if the number of people who benefited was higher than those who didn?t was what Mill criticised. ...read more.

Middle

Bentham is usually associated with Act utilitarianism, whilst Mill is associated with Rule utilitarianism. Act and Rule utilitarianism are both relative and consequential- the judgement is based upon the outcome. Strong Act utilitarianism (Bentham) is teleological, so it is based on the outcome of the action. However Rule utilitarianism is deontological which means that rules/laws have to be prioritised to benefit society as a whole. Mill was a weak rule utilitarianism so he would say that rules can be broken in some circumstances where it would bring higher happiness to more people. Bentham used his hedonic calculus to measure pleasure. The hedonic calculus asks seven questions about the pleasure to see whether it is maximised. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, if there was more than one murderer and only one victim, Bentham and Mill would disagree with each other. Bentham would say that the greatest number, in this case the murderers should get their pleasure. There is only one victim so Bentham would say the pleasure that the murderers get from killing the victim outweighs the pain of the victim. Whilst Mill would argue that the pleasure of the murderers is low and so cannot outweigh the real pain of the victim. For Mill the two murderers should be killed in order to make a healthier society. To conclude, Bentham focused on the quantity of pleasure, whilst Mill focused on the quality. Bentham is associated with Act utilitarianism whilst Mill is associated with Rule utilitarianism. However they both focused on the principle of utility and maximisation of happiness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

    such as emotions, imagination and intellectual pursuits etc, and lower pleasures are bodily things such as food, intercourse, drugs and drink etc, and it is better to seek higher pleasure than lower pleasure, so from this Mill said we can evaluate a situation and experiences should tell a person that

  2. Plato's Theory of Forms

    That is the realm of the Forms. Plato realises that the general run of humankind can think, and speak, etc., without any awareness of his realm of Forms. In the allegory, Plato likens people untutored in the Theory of Forms to prisoners chained in a cave, unable to turn their heads.

  1. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    If they speak out and are found to be wrong, then they have simply helped the mass come closer to the truth by falsely opposing it. Plato's analogy of the Beast shows how politicians will keep society happy in the short term, while not regarding what is best for them in the long term.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    In this chapter Nietzsche argues that all philosophy to date has simply been a reflection of its authors pre-held beliefs, and not completely rational and logical as it would be had that we should believe. Instead they are nothing more than a deep psychoanalysis on the part of their authors

  1. Plato Essay on his theory of 'Forms'

    One day one of the prisoners is permitted to leave the cave; he turns to face the fire and is momentarily blinded. Once his eyes become accustomed he exits the cave (the ascent to the outside world is a painful procedure)

  2. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain. Unhappiness is pain and the privation of pleasure. The Greatest Happiness Principle deems consequences rather than motives as important. Actions are right as long as they produce the "greatest good for the greatest number of people".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work