• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Owen Taylor R.P.E. Essay 20th September 2008 a) Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism Relativism is the principle that all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual. Moral and cultural relativism are perceived by many as somewhat similar and are easily confused. However there is a substantial difference between the two, which will be explored in the following. Cultural relativism is the manner that a person's attitude and conduct should be understood in terms of his or her culture. It explains the reasons why those from different cultures have a vastly different way of life. Cultural diversity has been documented since the earliest times. The Greek historian Herodotus travelled around the world and found it vastly different from his native homeland "The customs of the Getae...when a baby is born the family sits around and mourns at the though of suffering it must in endure...but when somebody dies, they bury him with merriment and rejoicing" this exemplifies the gulf between beliefs throughout the world then. Now, there are still limitless different beliefs in the world. One of these is the death penalty. It is enforced in numerous countries such as the United States and Thailand yet in even more countries it is highly frowned upon showing the cultural diversity of many countries on just one topic. ...read more.

Middle

This is similar to Instrumental ethics. This means that something is good because it leads to a desired result. An egoist is someone wh0o does things for the best intentions of himself and himself only. Utilitarianism accepts the existence of ethical conflict and is based on the question, "which act will result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people?" Doing something that has a negative impact on yourself but helps more people is seen as morally right. If you did something that is seen as immoral but had a positive effect on the majority involved then this would be seen as utilitarianism. The most famous utilitarian was John Stuart Mill. He believed that we have motivations to abide by the Utilitarian standard of morality. There are two classes of motivations for promoting general happiness. There are external sanctions and internal sanctions. External sanctions arise from our hope of pleasing and fear of displeasing God and others whereas internal sanctions come from our desire of pleasing ourselves. Subjective morality is dependant on an individual's internal thought. This means that a person would get the choice to make a personal moral decision. The fundamental difference between Cultural and Moral relativism is that moral is more individual to a particular person. It is more down to that persons true beliefs. Cultural relativism influences people's own personal moral opinions and so it results in consistent moral beliefs throughout that particular culture. ...read more.

Conclusion

This would mean that decisions would be made on what would have the greatest impact, which would result in a very fair and selfless society. Also, relativism leads to more respect for people, as they have to make their own decisions. It would mean people would now have a chance to think for themselves. This would surely mean that people would be able to express their opinions on things more openly and thus would result in faster development of society. It would allow society to move on, as there would be no fixed rules. Situation ethics (a relative theory) is where love (agape) is the only absolute. It is easy to understand and can constantly be upgraded for new problems. It also focuses on humans and concerns for others. It allows people to take responsibility for their own decisions and make up their own minds about what is right or wrong. Both opinions have sufficient ground for argument but I personally believe that it is fair to an extent. I do believe it is fairer than absolutism but there are still some fundamental flaws. I believe that it would be incredibly hard to condemn different crimes as in different circumstances it may not be seen as bad. Although thanks to utilitarianism some people would do things for the greater amount of people some egoists would do what is best for them. Many relativist theories contradict each other anyway and until these are resolved relativist theories cannot become any more involved in today's society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the features of moral relativism.

    relativist would look at the situation subjectively and come to the conclusion that all benefit from this decision and so it must be 'right'. Relativism includes the characteristics that are used in moral relativism. It states that all perceptions of situations are different and what is true for one person

  2. Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism

    the circumstances they would be in severe poverty without the extra income to feed the family, resulting in many deaths. Moral relativism plays a vital role in decisions such as this because it weighs up all the pros and cons.

  1. Teenagers today lack moral values and self-discipline. Do you agree?"

    Thus, something must be done to prevent the already worsening situation from getting any further out of hand.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    The Death Penalty is a simple-minded solution to a complex problem. It seems people like to complain about problems, but do not want to go to the trouble of finding reasonable solutions. They opt for the quick-fix; something that seems easy and simple to carry out but, in actuality, does nothing to address the problem.

  1. Explain what is meant by 'moral relativism'

    Since baby Charlotte was born she has stopped breathing three times and each time she has been resuscitated. Doctors at the hospital said they believed if she stopped breathing again they should not revive her as her quality of life would be so poor and her life would be dominated by pain.

  2. Examine and comment on Christian beliefs about homosexuality

    16 The Methodist view on homosexuality is mainly concerned with the moral issues that are involved in being homosexual. They believe it is the quality of life that is most important and not specifically whether it is a hetero or homosexual relationship that determines the moral values.

  1. Explain the difference between Absolute and Relative Morality

    The rules are broken when the positive effects of breaking the rule outweigh the positive effects of following it. For instance, killing a man may be justified if it would save the lives of other people.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    it means that all sorts of actions can be justified, depending on the time period or culture surrounding them. A positive of normative relativism though is that it means we become tolerant of other societies as we cannot look down on them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work