• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Owen Taylor R.P.E. Essay 20th September 2008 a) Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism Relativism is the principle that all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual. Moral and cultural relativism are perceived by many as somewhat similar and are easily confused. However there is a substantial difference between the two, which will be explored in the following. Cultural relativism is the manner that a person's attitude and conduct should be understood in terms of his or her culture. It explains the reasons why those from different cultures have a vastly different way of life. Cultural diversity has been documented since the earliest times. The Greek historian Herodotus travelled around the world and found it vastly different from his native homeland "The customs of the Getae...when a baby is born the family sits around and mourns at the though of suffering it must in endure...but when somebody dies, they bury him with merriment and rejoicing" this exemplifies the gulf between beliefs throughout the world then. Now, there are still limitless different beliefs in the world. One of these is the death penalty. It is enforced in numerous countries such as the United States and Thailand yet in even more countries it is highly frowned upon showing the cultural diversity of many countries on just one topic. ...read more.

Middle

This is similar to Instrumental ethics. This means that something is good because it leads to a desired result. An egoist is someone wh0o does things for the best intentions of himself and himself only. Utilitarianism accepts the existence of ethical conflict and is based on the question, "which act will result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people?" Doing something that has a negative impact on yourself but helps more people is seen as morally right. If you did something that is seen as immoral but had a positive effect on the majority involved then this would be seen as utilitarianism. The most famous utilitarian was John Stuart Mill. He believed that we have motivations to abide by the Utilitarian standard of morality. There are two classes of motivations for promoting general happiness. There are external sanctions and internal sanctions. External sanctions arise from our hope of pleasing and fear of displeasing God and others whereas internal sanctions come from our desire of pleasing ourselves. Subjective morality is dependant on an individual's internal thought. This means that a person would get the choice to make a personal moral decision. The fundamental difference between Cultural and Moral relativism is that moral is more individual to a particular person. It is more down to that persons true beliefs. Cultural relativism influences people's own personal moral opinions and so it results in consistent moral beliefs throughout that particular culture. ...read more.

Conclusion

This would mean that decisions would be made on what would have the greatest impact, which would result in a very fair and selfless society. Also, relativism leads to more respect for people, as they have to make their own decisions. It would mean people would now have a chance to think for themselves. This would surely mean that people would be able to express their opinions on things more openly and thus would result in faster development of society. It would allow society to move on, as there would be no fixed rules. Situation ethics (a relative theory) is where love (agape) is the only absolute. It is easy to understand and can constantly be upgraded for new problems. It also focuses on humans and concerns for others. It allows people to take responsibility for their own decisions and make up their own minds about what is right or wrong. Both opinions have sufficient ground for argument but I personally believe that it is fair to an extent. I do believe it is fairer than absolutism but there are still some fundamental flaws. I believe that it would be incredibly hard to condemn different crimes as in different circumstances it may not be seen as bad. Although thanks to utilitarianism some people would do things for the greater amount of people some egoists would do what is best for them. Many relativist theories contradict each other anyway and until these are resolved relativist theories cannot become any more involved in today's society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the features of moral relativism.

    relativist would look at the situation subjectively and come to the conclusion that all benefit from this decision and so it must be 'right'. Relativism includes the characteristics that are used in moral relativism. It states that all perceptions of situations are different and what is true for one person

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    As many great thinkers have said, our laws are too often directed at the results of social problems rather than the problems themselves. People don't care anymore. They don't care about their religion, their government, their laws, or each other.

  1. Teenagers today lack moral values and self-discipline. Do you agree?"

    However, these activities are addictive, which youths cannot restrain from. Despite knowing the harmful effects that these activities have, the pubescent adults still choose to ignore the fact that they are debauched simply because they do not have the self-discipline required to control themselves.

  2. Explain what is meant by Moral Relativism

    the circumstances they would be in severe poverty without the extra income to feed the family, resulting in many deaths. Moral relativism plays a vital role in decisions such as this because it weighs up all the pros and cons.

  1. Explain what is meant by 'moral relativism'

    The love that Fletcher meant was agape love or unconditional love. Whereas Natural Law theorists ask what the law says, Fletcher asks what the best decision to help others is. A recent example that can be associated with what is the best decision to help someone is 'The Charlotte Wyatt case'.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    If our moral rules work for us and theirs work for them, then there is nothing wrong with that. We can't judge them as being morally corrupt as their morals work for them. This leads us to be a more tolerant society.

  1. Explain the difference between Absolute and Relative Morality

    The rules are broken when the positive effects of breaking the rule outweigh the positive effects of following it. For instance, killing a man may be justified if it would save the lives of other people.

  2. Explain Moral Relativism

    A persons beliefs arise from their own personal circumstances. As time progresses the community, who have been equally influenced by their environment and history etc., develop common laws and practices that are generally accepted. Over time there can be radical shifts in perception and traditional norms are seen as wrong, an example of this is homosexuality, in 1533 under

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work