• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the difficulties which the problem of evil poses for the religious believer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the difficulties which the problem of evil poses for the religious believer. [35] Evil is a multifaceted term that can refer to moral evil (acts committed by human beings such as murder or rape) or natural evil (naturally occurring events such as famines, diseases and earthquakes). Both forms cause unimaginable human suffering. John Hick described evil as ?physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness.? It is not surprising, then, that the existence of evil can be a stumbling block for religious believers. Evil and suffering poses an obvious problem for the believer who trusts in a loving and powerful God. As Epicurus surmised in his inconsistent triad, if God is willing but unable to prevent evil he must not be omnipotent. Or, he could be able to prevent it and doesn?t. This means he is not omnibenevolent, and is not worthy of worship. The existence of evil calls into question the traditional theistic attributes of God. Hume had very similar ideas to Epicurus, he wrote, ?Epicurus's old questions are still unanswered.? The ironical Hume suggests that the god who designed the universe must have been a failure at the job and should have tried his hand at something else. ...read more.

Middle

A vehement critic of Christian morality, he thought that the concepts of good and evil were invented in the course of an elaborate power-game, as a way for weaker people to undermine the natural drives of their more powerful oppressors. However, suffering remained for Nietzsche one of the central problems of philosophy. Under the influence of his fellow German Arthur Schopenhauer ? a notorious pessimist who wrote that "the longer you live, the more clearly you will feel that, on the whole, life is a disappointment, nay, a cheat" ? Nietzsche saw suffering and tragedy as intrinsic to life and impossible to reconcile with the idea of a loving God. Furthermore, John Mackie argues that God could have created any possible world. The steps in his argument are as follows: God could have created any possible world, it is logically possible in one of the possible worlds that free human beings always acted rightly, therefore there is no logical contradiction in saying that in another of the possible worlds God could have created, ALL human beings always acted rightly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Contrastingly, Augustine put forward a ?soul-deciding? theodicy. He accepts God is perfect. The world he created reflects that perfection, but humans were created with free will. Sin and death entered the world through Adam and Eve and their disobedience. Natural evil is consequence of this disharmony of nature brought about by the fall. God is justified in not intervening because the suffering is a consequence of human action. The theodicy that is perhaps the least accepted among theists is the process theodicy. Process theology argues that the reality of God is not fixed and that God himself is still developing. God cannot force anything to happen, but rather only influence the exercise of this universal free will by offering possibilities. The possibility of evil has always existed. Ultimately, the question surrounding the origin of evil and suffering will never truly be solved with our fallible human understanding. Suffering needs to be understood in the overall context of God?s omniscient plan. Finite beings cannot understand. Suffering could be a punishment, or a tool to bring us closer to God. To quote Joseph Conrad, "The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary; men alone are quite capable of every wickedness.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the problem of evil (25 marks). Are the theodicies attempts to ...

    A criticism against Augustine's theodicy is that Augustine justifies suffering in this life with suggesting people go to hell to make up for it in the next , this raises a question as to why such a benevolent , omnipotent and omniscient creator , allow suffering to continue eternally in Hell.

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    To what extent are these solutions successful? (9) Just by looking at the general overview of these 2 completely different arguments, it is hard to tell with one out of the two is the most successful, so the only way to determine this is by looking at both sides pro's and con's.

  1. problem of evil

    This justifies temporary evil, which if complying with Ireneaus' thought enables the understanding of good. Many philosophers have added to Ireneaus' theodicy including John Hick (who claims that good developed from free will is better than ready-made goodness), and Peter Vardy who used an analogy of a king to illustrate

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    are my own, not by causes which affect me, as it were, from outside." By participating in your government and thinking for yourself you can achieve self mastery. By having political self-mastery you are free to form a society which forms your values, which leads to democracy.

  1. 'A belief in the life after death solves the problem of evil' Discuss

    For Irenaeus this problem is overcome by the idea that the world is not finished, we are moving towards perfect but we are not there yet. God's purpose was not to construct a paradise where the world was free of pain and suffering, but as a place where soul-development can take place, where mankind may become 'children of God'.

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    idea then it is sensible for a leader to understand what the true notion of good is. If one knows 'good' then one can use this mould to create a 'good system', which is surely more reliable than basing it on subjective ideas.

  1. Solutions to the problem of evil. The Problem of Evil states that because ...

    I find this is a very disturbing point of view for the reasons that it leaves us not only incapable of affecting our lives, but responsible for our actions, good or bad, as well.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    Forlornness: what about the people who believe in God? They obviously have someone to guide them and look up to Q23: Sartre contrasts Existentialist humanism and Absurd humanism. Existentialist humanism is an awareness of the world we live in and that the values and goals we create are set by mankind and not determined by any outside force; be it a god, nature or anything other than us.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work