• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory. Deontological theories are those that believe that an action is not determined right or wrong by the consequences butg by something else. Immanuel Kant is the key instigator in deontological ethics. Kant's aim was to establish 'a completely isolated metaphysic of morals which is not mixed with any theology or physics or metaphysics. To understand Kant's theory we must first distinguish between two kinds of statements; analytic statements and synthetic statements. Analytic statements are necessarily true. They are a priori arguments that includes the predicate within the subject. For example, all bachelors are male is analytic as the meaning of the subject (bachelor) includes the predicate (male). Synthetic statements do not include the predicate within the subject and are based on experience hence they are a posteriori. For example, by saying all bachelors are happy is not necessarily true, it depends upon the experience of the bachelors that make them happy or not. ...read more.


Kant says that the only thing that does not need proving is good will. Good will wills good to occur and therefore the motive is good. Good will can occur by humans using reason to make moral decisions, as reason is the measure of all moral conduct. To achieve the 'summon bomum' (the highest from of good) we must assume that human beings are free, because without freedom we cannot make a decision between right and wrong. If we are not free than we are not moral agents. Kant distinguishes between two imperatives or commands under which human beings act: * Hypothetical Imperatives are moral judgements based on 'if.' We make moral judgments as a means to an end that involves rational thinking. For example 'if you want good grades, you must revise,' we can reject the command (revise) if we are willing to reject the 'if ' on which the command rests. ...read more.


Although there is only one categorical imperative, Kant argued that this principle can be formulated in three different ways: 1. The Formula of the Law of Nature: Act as if the maxim of your action were become through your will a universal law of nature. 2. The Formula of the End Itself: Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end. 3. The Formula of the Kingdom of Ends: So act as if you were through your maxims a law-making member of a kingdom of ends. Kant thought that each of these three formulations would produce the same conclusion regarding the morality of any particular action, with no exceptions. Therefore, each of these four ways gives a step-by-step plan in order to determine whether an action is right or wrong. ?? ?? ?? ?? Michael Swift U6E ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Whilst at first glance this appears similar to the golden rule 'do unto others as you would do unto yourself', Kant's catagorical imperative deals with problem cases such as masochistic and suicidal individuals coherently. It also accounts for the problematic question 'is the reason you should treat others as you

  2. What are the Main Features of Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory?

    This may lead to a greater amount of pain being caused with no intention of doing so. With utilitarianism, there is no way of justifying your actions. As one of the main supporters of utilitarianism and Bentham, Mill has come under a lot of criticism, as has utilitarianism its self.

  1. “Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make,” Discuss.

    No matter how much the events around us may be pre determined the human mind still has the capability of acting in a completely unpredictable manner without any specific cause being suggested for actions. Soft determinism is the third deterministic standpoint and one where determinism and free will are completely compatible.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    Basically, the subject of the statement is contained within the predicate. In the statement 'all unmarried men are bachelors', 'unmarried men' is the subject and 'bachelors' is the predicate. In this statement, the predicate and subject both mean the same thing so it would be foolish to say that the statement is false.

  1. Austin's theory of law is based on coercio

    be re-characterized as part of a long chain of reasoning for eventually imposing a sanction (Austin spoke in this context of the sanction of "nullity") on those who fail to comply with the relevant provisions. However, such a re-characterization misses the basic purpose of those sorts of laws-they are arguably about granting power and autonomy, not punishing wrongdoing.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    To do something good is simply because you enjoy doing it, is not in itself moral. Morality is always a matter of conscious choice. Kant makes a distinction between duty and inclination. We may be inclined to do what benefits ourselves, but morality is more than personal preference.

  1. A) Clarify the key features of a deontological theory of ethics

    In essence, he believed he had created an autonomous method of working out universal moral rules. To clarify how we know which actions are good and which are not, Kant indicated two imperatives, the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    Second, moral identity appeals to humanity as such and posits a universal application. It identifies the self as fundamentally a citizen of the Kingdom of Ends where men as humans agree to follow and abide and bind themselves to the laws all willed to be laws.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work