• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the features and origins of the Cosmological Argument

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain the features and origins of the Cosmological Argument (35) The existence of God is one of the greatest unsolved questions of humanity. For centuries theologians and philosophers have formulated arguments, including the cosmological argument. This argument claims that all things in nature depend on something else for their existence (i.e. are contingent), and that the whole cosmos must therefore itself depend on a being which exists independently or necessarily. There must have been a first cause, which brought the universe into existence. This first cause must have necessary existence to cause the contingent universe. God has necessary existence, therefore God is the first cause of the contingent universe's existence. The cosmological argument is posteriori, meaning it is derived by reasoning from observed facts. The argument is also synthetic, as it requires physical evidence, and it is inductive. An inductive argument is an argument that is intended by the arguer merely to establish or increase the probability of its conclusion. This is because it is often used primarily to justify the faith of those that are already theists, especially in the case of Aquinas. ...read more.


This is what we understand to be God. Christian theology has always taught that God sustains the universe. In other words, if God ceased to exist then the universe would also cease. Therefore there must be an initiator of the change whose continued existence is depended upon, like a play depends on the actors. Following on, the second form of the argument is the uncaused causer. This follows a similar line of argument but replaces motion with cause: Every effect has a cause; infinite regress is impossible; therefore there must be a first cause. Something cannot cause itself for this would mean it preceded itself and this is impossible. Hence the need for an uncaused causer, namely God. One of the differences between these two points is that in the first, attention is centred on the fact that things are acted upon, whereas in the second, the attention is on things as agents (doing the acting upon). The first cause sees God as a factual necessity, as the causal explanation to the universe. This means that God is seen as a being who is not dependent on any other for His existence. ...read more.


Although the argument is fundamentally Islamic, and dates from the 9th Century CE, it was ?discovered? in the western world by William L. Craig, who revised it slightly. To quote, ?If the universe began to exist, and if the universe is caused, then the cause of the universe must be a personal being who freely chooses to create the world.? Another key version of the Cosmological Argument is Leibnizt?s Principle of Sufficient Reason. Leibnitz proposed this argument in his book ?Theodicy?, in it he says that nothing can?t turn itself into something (since by the very nature of nothing it has no ability to cause itself to change), and our very existence shows that nothing did turn into something, there must have been some external force which caused it to do so. The final key version of the Cosmological Argument is Richard Swinburne and his application of Oakham?s Razor. Richard Swinburne says that God is quite simply the easiest explanation for everything. This is the principle that if a single self-sufficient explanation for can be found, then there is no gain in exploring other more complex explanations; Swinburne expresses this himself in the following quote: ?There could be no simpler explanation than one which postulates only one cause. Theism is simpler than polytheism.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    world had a mother, the human race must also have a mother!58 It may be that Russell misses the point here, as Gaunilo did with the 'lost island' when discussing the ontological argument. Neither Aquinas nor Leibniz is arguing that because each event in the world requires a casual explanation,

  2. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    Also this presumably could be outweighed by a weakness were just because you do something to be a generous person but you didn't actually want to do it in the first place is not always the right thing to do.

  1. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument

    This means that there must have been a time when nothing existed, and, since something can't come from nothing there must be something external which created the something out of the nothingness. This external being who is external to existence must have caused us, and we call such a being God.

  2. Explain the Key features of the cosmological argument

    motion is moved by something else' and therefore states that infinite regress is impossible. This provides the theory that there must be a first mover. Aquinas was speaking of motion in the broadest sense. He included not only movement from one place to another, but also movement in the sense of change of quality or quantity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work